Gold & Precious Metals

First published Sat Oct 3 for members :  Since 2011, it has been quite clear that the metals have been in a downtrend, while equity markets have been in an uptrend.  But, over the last several months, I have mentioned in our Trading Room that I think we may see a paradigm shift soon, as I believe that they may begin to rally together as the stock market moves up in its next rally phase over 2300.  So, I have been looking for clues that such alignment may be developing.  This past week may have provided additional clues and the upcoming two weeks may solidify this new paradigm.

As many of you know, I still think that there is a strong likelihood that the equity markets see lower lows in the coming weeks.  And, as many of you also know, I still think there is a strong likelihood that the metals markets see lower lows in the coming weeks.  And, the upcoming week could align the two.

This past week, I noted the short set up that the metals were presenting.  So, while we caught the top of the move on Thursday, and then expected a rally off Thursday’s low, the rally was more than I had expected, and invalidated the immediate short set up.   Does that mean that lower lows will not be seen?  No, as I still believe lower lows will be seen.  But, it does open the door yet again to a bigger corrective rally to be seen in the upcoming week.

And, along with the corrective rally we are now seeing, it seems to have aligned with the corrective rally we have been expecting in the equity markets.  Moreover, if both the equity market and the metals market continue in this corrective rally over the next week, or even if both break support in the upcoming week, it seems that both will be setting up for declines which will take them to new lows within their respective corrections that can be completed over the next 6 weeks.  This would then set them up to begin to rally in unison for some time.

At this point in time, this is only a theory.  Clearly, I will need to see how the market develops over the upcoming week to have a much better idea as to whether this will, in fact, occur.  But, the set up for such alignment is clearly in place.  And, if we are to see follow through in these set ups, then it will likely take most by surprise as the common perspective is that they move inversely.  For this reason, I am simply laying the ground work to prepare you for this potential should we see confirmation in the next few weeks so that you are not caught flat footed, as the rest of the market is left scratching their head.

I want to digress a moment, and thank all of you who have written in as we were celebrating our 4thanniversary.  We have received many posts and emails congratulating us and telling us that we have been the most accurate source of analysis for the metals and miners for the 4 years since we have been open.  We truly appreciate the support. 

But, I think I may be disappointing most of you this weekend.  But, I would like to quote Robert Prechter to explain why:

Of course, there are often times when, despite a rigorous analysis, there is no clearly preferred interpretation.  At such times, you must wait until the count resolves itself.  When after a while the apparent jumble gels into a clear picture, the probability that a turning point is at hand can suddenly and excitingly rise to nearly 100%.

Right now, I am about 50/50 as to whether this move higher will continue in the metals and miners, but have no set up in place to go net short.  Therefore, as of my writing this update, I remain net long.

As far as the wave structures are concerned, the GDX is truly in between two counts.  As you can see, as long as we now remain below 14.71, the blue count to take us down to lower lows sooner rather than later is still on the table.  A break out over 14.71 puts us squarely focused on the blue box for the purple count.  And, until we see the next i-ii downside structure, or see a completed upside pattern into the blue box, I will not be adding any further short side trades. 

The GLD presents rather similarly to the GDX.  As long as it remains below 110.82, the immediate downside set up is in place, but a move through it has us targeting the blue box overhead.

Silver is not much different than its brethren.  Resistance stands at 15.43, followed by 15.85-91.  Through secondary resistance, it can move up as high as 17.  And, as with the others, after being stopped out of my short with a small profit, I will not be looking down until the next 1-2 downside structure is in place.

I know that we have all been waiting quite patiently for the final lows to be struck in this correction, which has continued for over four years now.  But, several weeks ago, for the first time in 4 years, the miners and the metals moved into our target boxes set years ago.  So, I have been a net buyer of metals and miners, and will continue to do so on further declines.  (In fact, I am currently net long, and have no reason to change that position until I see the next i-ii structure set up to the downside). 

Due to the significant potential I see over the long term in this sector, most long term investors should now be focused on the long side of this market if you are serious about the long term prospects.  To me, personally, I only view any further declines as a buying opportunity and have no interest in trading further downside heavily. While I will still hedge my long term positions when the market sets up for further downside, and may even go net short depending upon the particular set up, in my humble opinion, the time for aggressively shorting this market has passed.      

Finally, the question I am constantly asked is what will convince me to consider that the bottom has already been struck.  Well, if the GLD were to complete a full 5 waves up to 122 or higher, then I would have to strongly consider that a bottom has been struck, and a pullback into the 110-115 region should be bought.  Until such time, I am still looking for one final wash out.

See charts illustrating the wave counts on the GLD, GDX and YI at https://www.elliottwavetrader.net/scharts/Charts-on-GDX-GLD-and-YI-20151004847.html.

Avi Gilburt is a widely followed Elliott Wave technical analyst and author of ElliottWaveTrader.net (www.elliottwavetrader.net), a live Trading Room featuring his intraday market analysis (including emini S&P 500, metals, oil, USD & VXX), interactive member-analyst forum, and detailed library of Elliott Wave education.

Bio Bombshells Slam the Drug Firms

Screen Shot 2015-10-06 at 8.43.02 PMA series of “bio-bombshells” is hitting the drug stocks where it hurts – in the wallet!

On Sunday, it was the New York Times that published a story headlined: “Valeant’s Drug Price Strategy Enriches It, but Infuriates Patients and Lawmakers.”

Yesterday, it was the Wall Street Journal with a story titled “For Prescription Drug Makers, Price Increases Drive Revenue.”

And of course, late last month, the industry got its bogeyman in the form of Martin Shkreli. His company, Turing Pharmaceuticals, bought a drug called Daraprim that treats an infection called toxoplasmosis. Then the company proceeded to hike the price by more than 5,000% before backtracking somewhat.

What the heck is going on? 

Well, you have a wide variety of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies that take different approaches to the business.

turmoilSome of the biggest players funnel billions of dollars in profit from patent-protected drugs into research and development, in order to come up with new and better treatments for life-threatening diseases. Politicians and regulators grudgingly accept the rising cost of their drugs because at least they’re re-investing in their businesses.

But companies like Valeant Pharmaceuticals (VRX) are increasingly coming under fire. They’re buying old drugs or entire companies, hiking prices willy-nilly, and distributing huge chunks of profit to shareholders and management rather than investing in R&D.

The Times story notes that Valeant quadrupled the price of a drug called Cuprimine. That drove up the cost of one man’s treatment to $35,000 a month – a cost largely eaten by Medicare. His own out-of-pocket co-pays surged to $1,800 a month from $366.

The Journal tells a separate story about Biogen (BIIB) and its Avonex treatment for multiple sclerosis. Biogen raised its price 21 times, at an average annual increase of 16%, despite falling prescription volume and the fact it’s an older medication. The story goes on to note that U.S sales growth of 30 top drugs surged 61% on average, even as prescriptions rose one-third as much.

There are so many sides to this story that it’s hard to track them all. Surging drug prices raise widespread ethical, political and social concerns.

But this column is focused on the investment implications of world developments. And the negative publicity is clearly putting downside pressure on biotech stocks in particular and drug stocks in general. Reason: Investors are worried Washington could slap price controls or other punitive measures on pharma companies that have been making billions for their shareholders off the backs of vulnerable, sick Americans.

Valeant has tanked by $100 a share just since August, while Biogen has dropped $200 in only seven months. The benchmark iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) has lost more than 15% in only the past three months, and is desperately trying to hold above its August panic low.

scourgeI would keep a very close eye on those August lows if I owned any biotech stocks or ETFs. If that area of technical support can’t hold, it will probably lead to even more follow-on selling as investors throw in the towel. That, in turn, could put more downward pressure on investments like the PowerShares QQQ Trust (QQQ). After all, biotech and other health-care companies make up around 14% of its holdings.

Other Developments of the Day

● Nelson Peltz and his Trian Fund Management firm are notorious for buying stakes in companies, taking board seats, and agitating for management changes, strategic shifts, and the like. But the activist investor’s latest $2.5 billion bet on General Electric (GE) appears different.

GE is a huge industrial conglomerate and Peltz’s suggestions for what it should do are fairly run-of-the-mill. That’s leading to questions about whether his involvement will actually do anything longer term for shareholders.

● Volkswagen AG is shutting down non-essential investments and planning to cut spending to the bone as it struggles with the potentially huge financial impact of its emissions scandal. The carmaker may need to pay more than $7 billion to fix affected vehicles, plus several billion dollars more in fines in the U.S., Europe, and elsewhere.

● The energy industry has been battered and bruised by the collapse in oil prices. But it appears to be getting closer to a significant legislative win: The repeal of the U.S.’s 40-year-old ban on exporting crude oil. The ban was enacted during the era of Arab oil embargos, but looks increasingly unnecessary thanks to the surge in U.S. oil and gas production.

Should we export oil? Will Volkswagen be able to survive this self-inflicted crisis? Do you think the gains in GE shares will stick? Hit up the website and let me hear about these or other topics of the day.

Until next time,

Mike Larson

Gold Will Breakout as Rate Hike Myth Dies (Video)

Screen Shot 2015-10-06 at 11.39.52 AMTwo persistent myths convince gold bears that the price of gold will remain low – a looming series of interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve and the fact that gold did not rally during the last round of quantitative easing. Peter Schiff explains why both of these myths are ready to die following Friday’s terrible job report. The silver price surged significantly higher on Friday’s news, and Peter thinks it won’t be long before gold also breaks out of its trading range. Investors are quickly running out of time to take advantage of these low prices.

Stay tuned for a full transcript.

0:04 – Friday’s jobs data was much worse than the consensus forecast.

0:30 – Gold and silver rallied on the news, with silver trading at a 3-month high on Monday morning. 

1:15 – Gold will follow silver’s lead and break out to new highs. Bearish speculators have been keeping the price down, because they believe higher interest rates are coming.

2:00 – Even if the Fed raised interest rates, there is no historical evidence that this would be bearish for gold. 

3:00 – Janet Yellen’s rate hike pace would be even slower than the pace Alan Greenspan raised rates, which was very bullish for gold.

4:10 – Friday’s economic data will mark the beginning of the wake up call to gold bears that the Fed is not going to raise rates. 

4:52 – Even though QE3 was not bullish for gold, QE4 would be a completely different situation. 

5:44 – The dollar is not going to have all the support of emerging market economies like it did during previous rounds of QE. 

7:03 – Goldman Sachs is now saying the Fed is more likely to raise rates in 2017.

7:28 – There’s a good chance that Q3 GDP could be negative, which means the United States could easily be in a recession by the end of 2015. 

8:08 – The Fed has probably made the same mistake it did before the housing crash, overestimating the strength of the economy just as it was about to slip into a recession.

http://schiffgold.com/

A few bad choices come to mind: 

  • 1971: President Nixon refused to exchange dollars for gold subsequent to August 15, 1971.  He claimed it was “temporary” and blamed speculators.  Gold prices and inflation soared.
  • Mid-1990s: The Federal Reserve dramatically increased debt and the money supply and encouraged the NASDAQ “dot.com” bubble.  The bubble crashed in 2000 and destroyed $Trillions in assets and retirements.  Investors preferred stocks and bonds until after they crashed.  Gold and silver soared after 9-11.
  • 2001: “Unknown” people created the 9-11 disaster.  That event became the excuse for the Patriot Act and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  History shows that a number of empires collapsed following their attempts to conquer either Bagdad or Afghanistan.  American foreign policy chose to ignore history and invade both.  The costs have been outrageous with questionable results.  Gold doubled and silver prices tripled between 2001 and 2006.
  • 2004 – 2008: Banks and politicians encouraged the real estate bubble with easy money, “liar loans,” various derivative products, and delusions such as “real estate always goes up.”  The real estate market crashed and partially caused the 2008 financial collapse.  Pension underfunding, welfare expenses, food stamp participants, disability income, and the number of workers no longer in the job market have increased since then.  Gold doubled and silver prices tripled between 2004 and 2008.
  • 2009 – 2015: Hope and change, QE, and ZIRP have been disappointing.  Those Americans in the bottom 90% are still hoping for better days but expecting little change.  ZIRP has destroyed earnings from savings, damaged pension funds, and encouraged mal-investment.  More ugly consequences of both QE and ZIRP will manifest in the next five years.  Gold and silver will soar in the next 2 – 5 years. 

The common elements in those “BAD CHOICES” were:

  • Increased debt;
  • Politicians;
  • Bankers;
  • And good timing for purchases of gold and silver.

Good Choices:

  • 1971: Buy gold at $42 and silver at $1.50
  • 1999: Buy gold at $280 and silver at $5.00
  • 2001: Buy gold at $260 and silver at $4.15
  • 2008: Buy gold at $800 and silver at $9.00
  • 2015: Buy gold at $1,100 and silver at $15.00

Of course we can point to many other bad and good choices over the past 45 years.  Buying gold in early January 1980 and for much of the next 19 years was probably a bad choice, so do your own research to make good choices.  While trading paper currencies for gold is, in my opinion, currently a good exchange, it is not always a good choice.

 SUGGESTIONS: 

  • Physical gold and silver instead of unbacked debt based fiat currency.
  • Physical gold and silver instead of bonds that will eventually default.
  • Less foreign military involvement instead of more wars, expanded military actions, and the resulting increased taxes and inflation.
  • A 3rd party not owned by bankers and the military instead of a Republicrat or a Democan.

Make your own choices.  Consider real money, not the digital and paper stuff.

Read:

Steve St. Angelo: The Silver Supply Crunch

Alasdair Macleod: Gold Remains Money

Doug Casey:  Three Reasons Why the US Govt. Should Default

Gary Christenson

The Deviant Investor

Jim Rogers: I Would Not Be Buying U.S. Real Estate

Screen Shot 2015-10-06 at 7.13.42 AMThe Chinese rush to buy U.S. Real Estate is probably a sign of a top in that market. 

…..listen to Jim’s  podcast HERE

also from Rogers:

China Will Not Save Us Like They Did In 2008-09

test-php-789