As we close out 2021, I want to provide you with an honest understanding of our current economic environment, the real risks we face, and the opportunities we may have. Grab some popcorn and cross your fingers.

Bigger Government

The most recent edition of The Economist proudly proclaims, “The Triumph of Big Government.” They are right.

The most disturbing thing about what will happen over the next 18 months, just like what has already transpired over the past 18 months, is that market and economic events will be driven almost entirely by Government; their decisions, and their rules. It will not be driven by the market economy or any participants in it. This is unusual, troubling and the inverse of how free-market capitalism, or market-based democracy is designed to function. Clearly, market- based democracy has been unbelievably successful over the past 250 years, raising millions out of poverty. This current environment is much more akin to state-controlled capitalism, such as practiced in communist China, Russia and Venezuela.

This fact needs consideration. Throughout history there are few, if any, examples of Governments which, entirely by their own accord and without coercion, choose to cede control and power, and which choose to become smaller and less important.

While you may feel this is a good thing, or a bad thing, the reality of it forces us to focus our analysis almost entirely on the actions and activities of Governments, primarily in the U.S..

As I have stated many times, hard and financial assets will continue to inflate in this environment . This because cash itself devalues on a relative basis. We, of course, knew this. This is exactly why, since the Spring of 2020, we have encouraged clients to add capital to your portfolio, or alternatively to buy any hard asset such as real estate, art, or physical gold.

Taxes

Over the past 18 months, almost uniformly, but disproportionately so in the U.S., G7 and G20 Governments have borrowed vast amounts money and expanded dramatically in both size and scope – to a scale greater than any point in history. Unlike what many politicians and finance ministers have been saying (who quite frankly, either should know better, or whom are being intentionally disingenuous), this expansion and resulting borrowing will indeed have a cost.

The most immediate direct cost will likely be increasing taxation. Indeed, the most recent American spending bill includes the provision for 80,000 more IRS auditors. Taxes create a significant economic drag which in turn damage economic opportunity, innovation, entrepreneurship, and growth.

This is to say nothing of the annual structural deficits (annual deficits, caused by expanded Government program spending which then must be built into a budget each year, but which cannot be covered by current tax revenues) a new much larger Government will impose upon those who are expected to pay for it. This would imply perpetual deficits and the perpetual servitude of taxpayers, be they individuals or corporations.

Please keep in mind that prior to the covid calamity, the U.S. already had a structural annual deficit of $984 Billion and Canada was similarly spending $14 Billion more than it could afford annually.

They Are Not Going To Print More Cash Are They?

Over the past 18 months, Governments have now printed more cash than at any time in history – adjusted for inflation! Government has printed this cash in order to provide both monetary (institutional) and fiscal (individual) stimulus to buffer the economy from the severe impact of the self-imposed lockdown.

An important point here, which I hope everyone understands, is that Governments are mechanically incapable of actually creating capital or wealth. They simply cannot do either.

But if you are an adherent to Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), a trendy academic theory/ideology which now dominates the hushed dark corners of most Central Banks globally, this inability to create capital or wealth is not a problem. Their theory speculates that if every G7 or G20 Government simply prints more cash, then people will just have more money, and everything is fine. Right?

Please keep in mind that, for the most part, these young Central Bank civil servants have never actually created capital or wealth or participated in a market economy to any degree. They have never started a business, never owned one, and most importantly they have never had to make payroll. Most disturbingly, they really have just one tool – the cash printer.

If you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

If you have yet to hear about Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), like it or not, you will hear much more about it in the months and years ahead. MMT is the baseline academic rationalization which Central Bankers will point to, in order justify a very transformative economic policy. One that you had no opportunity to vote for.

Inflation

We at McIver Capital Management have been saying over the past 18 months that the risk we faced when Government began these expansive programs (the massive fiscal and monetary stimulus programs designed to push cash into the economy), was inflation. It would begin with hard asset (real estate, gold, art, classic cars etc.) and financial asset inflation, then move into food inflation which then creates a cost-push inflationary cycle as virtually everything begins to rise in price. The most impactful would be the cost of labour.

The MMT crowd will tell you that this dangerous upward inflationary cycle is just “transitory” and will end soon as the excess cash washes through the system. However, in truth, inflation is just “transitory” until it isn’t. Then, suddenly, it is endemic, entrenched, locked into expectations, and it goes about its business insidiously damaging the economy.

Please keep in sharp focus, that one of the two U.S. Federal Reserve mandates is to keep core inflation at 2%, which is considered optimal. Over the last 30 years they have largely been able to achieve this goal.

Let’s review what takes place when Government prints money:
Every time they print $100 dollars, the dollar in your back pocket is worth less. That’s just the math. And when cash devalues, we all experience inflation. The more they print, the less your dollar is worth.

Since January, a simple trip to the grocery store has dramatically changed. Sugar has risen 33%, Corn up 30%, Coffee has risen 86%, Rice 7.5%, Poultry 29%. While Beef has been flat over the past year, it is up 28% since the printing presses started in the spring of 2020.

Again, we expected this and increased your positions in agricultural and commodities in general starting in May of 2020. Most of those are up some 40%. Unsurprisingly the CRB Commodity index (which McIver Capital clients largely own) is up 40.43% just since January 1.

The Producers Price Index (PPI), which measures the cost increases manufacturers face when producing products is now annualizing at 8.7%. Because these costs are passed on to the rest of the economy and of course consumers, this is a relatively reliable leading indicator of where future inflation is headed. But even this stunning inflation number may be muted. Recently Costco estimated that its suppliers are experiencing 2-4% monthly inflation (which equates to 20–40% annualized inflation).

An Extraordinarily Bad Idea

One of the two largest inputs into the cost of living and inflation itself is energy. Higher energy prices increase the costs of everything in the economy because virtually all goods are transported using energy.

By ensuring a plentiful and cheap supply, the Government can ensure that goods can be delivered, and labour can travel to where it is needed in the economy, as efficiently and inexpensively as possible. In many respects, it is the most effective way to protect consumers and counteract the damaging forces of inflation.

Additionally, as a country, the best way to be able to have this ability, is to be able to produce all the energy needed domestically and not be dependent on an international market. International markets are inherently unstable, with potentially large price spikes, and force a nation to do business with potentially unsavory energy sellers.

In 2019 the U.S. achieved energy independence for the first time in almost 60 years. This was a historic and important milestone. A milestone which, after 30 years of being involved in almost continual conflict in the middle east, was long overdue. Energy independence allowed the U.S. to finally sever the umbilical cord between themselves and the middle east.

Importantly, the U.S. was also able to build significant strategic oil reserves to help buffer any supply shortages. This was the perfect position to be in given the storm clouds of inflation clearly forming on the horizon.

In what one could only describe as an extraordinarily bad idea on many levels, for seemingly purely ideological reasons, the new American administration cancelled the Keystone XL Pipeline project, among a large number of other existing and proposed projects to generate energy.

Without these sources of energy coming online, the U.S quickly burned through its strategic reserves and is now, once again, dependent on foreign energy. This is exactly why you have seen the new administration, just months after cancelling domestic energy projects, pleading with OPEC to increase its energy production. They will not, by the way.

Accordingly, specifically at the moment when the benefit of a fully domestic energy supply was to become critical to counteract inflation, it was eliminated. Without the protection of a domestic supply, energy prices have indeed spiked, making the impact of inflation that much worse.

Gasoline prices are now up a whopping 65% since January with energy prices in general, across all forms, up more than 30% since January.

Inflation is catchy, and while we in Canada may not be able to export our energy to the U.S. in the volume needed, we most assuredly will import the inflation that the lack of energy will create to our south.

Napalm Anyone?

As discussed above, Government is now the arbitrator of all things economic in the U.S., and by extension, Canada. Since the beginning of the covid calamity, and including the recently passed Infrastructure Bill, the U.S. has borrowed/printed and pushed more than $6 Trillion dollars into the economy, which has caused the massive distortion and the inflation discussed above.

American legislators are now considering the Build Back Better bill, which will spend and push into the economy additional Trillions. Credible third-party auditors have estimated the actual cost of this bill to be up to an amazing $4.3 Trillion dollars.

For context, in today’s dollars (meaning in today’s value), the United States spent a total of $4.7 Trillion fighting and winning WW2 over 4 years. The $4.7 Trillion in today’s dollars includes the rebuilding of both Europe and Japan for many years after that, under the Marshall Plan.

If this indeed does pass in the current form, the economic distortion (and damage) will be well beyond anyone’s ability to forecast. Crippling structural deficits would be almost a guarantee.

All of this is evidently due to covid.

Does anyone else remember 2 weeks to flatten the curve?

What Else Are We Worried About?

We have number of concerns beyond what I have discussed in detail above. Of those, as the second largest economy in the world, China remains near the top of our list.

We are watching carefully as Chinese domestic real estate companies run into significant liquidity problems. This was inevitable based upon an environment in which borrowing heavily to speculate is common. This is combined with a propensity for shadow banking (unregistered private loans). At this point, although liquidity problems can be catchy, we do not see an immediate threat.

Most of our concern with China is geopolitical. Since Chairman Mao, the Chinese Communists have run the country largely by committee. President Xi, however, was appointed for life, which changes the equation to a great degree. Over the last few years, he has been conducting himself, and the affairs of China, much more as a dictator, or an Emperor would.

Xi will act against anyone and any entity, either internally or externally, which threatens his power. We have seen this with Alibaba CEO Jack Ma going into hiding for a time. Perhaps sensing American weakness, we have more ominously seen this with China’s growing aggression and belligerence toward Taiwan. The chance that China, under the CCP and Xi, becomes more of a concern moving forward, is extremely high.

We have been very much underweight China in your portfolios for some time and we will be decreasing exposure further in the coming weeks.

Are There Some Positive Signs?

Yes, from a portfolio and financial market perspective over the medium term, there are a fair number, in fact. Firstly, the asset party will continue.  Much of your performance over the past year has been driven by asset inflation due to the stimulus spending as discussed above, and you have done very well. That event is far from over, and there is still a fair amount of stimulus dollars that has not yet been spent.

Secondly, there is a natural, and real economic recovery taking place from the covid calamity and that will continue over the next year. Corporate earnings remain very good, and interest rates, for the time being, remain low. These are all very positive key inputs for both the financial and real estate markets.

Lastly, assuming the Build Back Better Bill is not passed, there is a possibility that some of the inflation is indeed transitory and exits the economy over the next 18 months. Our estimation is that much of it will not, but it remains an open question.

We believe the markets will indeed remain buoyant into the spring of next year and potentially beyond. That said, there will parts of the market which we will wish to own, and parts of the market which we will be taking profits on and exiting.

In the Future

Over the past 18 months we have been continually adjusting and updating portfolios to ensure they are properly structured for both our current and future economic environments. This is where our performance has come from. The results have been clear.

Because of the clear economic and financial market distortion we are now experiencing, managing risk exposure will be paramount over the next two years. There will be both great opportunity, and great volatility along the way.

For more information on McIver Capital Management, and to see the net after fee performance of their portfolios CLICK HERE. Neil and his team are currently accepting new clients. ~Ed

Michigan lawmakers are considering a change to high school curriculum by requiring students to complete a personal finance course before graduation.

The House Committee on Education heard testimony about House Bill 5190, which would mandate all students pass a half-credit financial literacy class to graduate. It would cover topics like earning, spending, borrowing, saving and investing money.

“Michigan schools have an obligation to prepare students for success after graduation,” said Republican State Rep. Diana Farrington of Utica. “Personal finance is one of life’s most important responsibilities as graduates move into adulthood, but our curriculum has neglected to prepare our young people to manage their resources wisely.”

Students in public and charter high schools currently must take a course in economics, which can be substituted with a personal finance class. Farrington’s bill would remove the option and require both an economics and personal finance course…read more.

Metro Vancouver’s annual utility fees are projected to climb 65% over the next half-decade to almost $1,000 annually by 2026, a massive spike as the region races to replace costly and aging infrastructure.

In 2021, a household paid roughly $574 to the regional body, a collection of 21 municipalities, Electoral Area A at UBC and the Tsawwassen First Nation. In return, Metro provides most of the local authorities with clean tap water, a sewage network, regional parks and a system to recycle and process garbage.

Next year, the 2022 proposed budget is expected to go up $21 to $595.

But by 2026, that yearly rate is expected to climb to $952, a $378 increase from today, according to a Metro Vancouver 2022 capital budget and 2022-2026 capital plan revealed last week.

“There will be significant increases over the next number of years. Period,” Metro Commissioner Jerry Dobrovolny told the finance and intergovernment committee…read more.