Energy & Commodities

Idiocy Has No Bounds – Spain Taxes Sunlight

imagesProving that idiocy truly has no bounds, Spain issued a “royal decree” taxing sunlight gatherers. The state threatens fines as much as 30 million euros for those who illegally gather sunlight without paying a tax.

The tax is just enough to make sure that homeowners cannot gather and store solar energy cheaper than state-sponsored providers.

Via Mish-modified Google Translate from Energias Renovables, please consider Photovoltaic Sector, Stunned 

 The Secretary of State for Energy, Alberto Nadal, signed a draft royal decree in which consumption taxes are levied on those who want to start solar power systems on their rooftops. The tax, labeled a “backup toll” is high enough to ensure that it will be cheaper to keep buying energy from current providers.

Spain Privatizes the Sun

Via Google translate from El Pais, please consider Spain Privatizes The Sun 

 If you get caught collecting photons of sunlight for your own use, you can be fined as much as 30 million euros.

If you were thinking the best energy option was to buy some solar panels that were down 80% in price, you can forget about it.

“Of all the possible scenarios, this is the worst,” said José Donoso, president of the Spanish Photovoltaic Union (UNEF), which represents 85% of the sector’s activity.

Before the decree it took 12 years to recover the investment in a residential installation of 2.4 kilowatts of power. Following the decree, it will take an additional 23 years according to estimates by UNEF.

Petition of the Candle Makers Revisited 

And so the “Petition of the Candle Makers” comes to pass.

I have written about the “petition” on many occasions, but here is the latest reference: Extremely Difficult to Keep Up With Economic Stupidity

 Reflections on “Unfair Competition”

Corporations always consider it “unfair” when any other company can do things faster, smarter, or cheaper than they can. The buggy whip industry once protested cars.

Today, land-line telecom companies have to compete with wireless and they don’t like it. Now, we see protests about VOIP (voice over internet protocol).

Technology marches on. But France does not like it. The French solution is to tax Skype because it has an “unfair advantage“.

This is an age-old unwinnable argument.

Petition of the Candle Makers 

The ultimate irony is France’s preposterous “unfair advantage” argument was lampooned by French economist Frederic Bastiat back in 1845 when he penned ‘Petition of the Candle Makers‘.

In his article, candle makers were incensed that the light of the sun could be had for free. The sun’s unfair trade advantage was to the “detriment of fair industries” who could not compete against the sun’s price.

Something had to be done to “shut off as much as possible, all access to natural light, and thereby create a need for artificial light” so that “industry in France will encouraged”.

The moral to this story is “Don’t propose something purposefully stupid hoping to make a point. Some idiot might actually think it’s a good idea and do it”.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Read more at http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/07/spain-levies-consumption-tax-on-sunlight.html#k7liqm6ZudIqHw0F.99

VANC REAL ESTATE “BULL TRAP”

9592674

Notice on the chart above that during the labelled periods ZIRP grande and ZIRP petite, all three Vancouver residential housing sectors sold off in price and total number of residential sales. A significant difference was that during ZIRP grande, single family detached housing diverged from the whole market and produced a false trend change signal and went on to zoom into the blow off phase adding another 20% to the price which has mostly evaporated.

….whole article HERE

Rude Numbers Targets Predictions & Wild Guesses

 

Too Damn Bullish

  • Sentiment extremes flash warning signs
  • Sleepwalking investors are finally buying
  • Plus: What’s price telling us right now?

The individual investor is back. And he’s too damn bullish, according to about 5,000 reports I stumbled upon over the weekend.

In fact, the “everyone’s too bullish” theme is boiling over into the workweek.

“Stocks Regain Broad Appeal” reads the headline splashed across the front page of the Wall Street Journal this morning… 

Of course, stories like this one are filled with quotes from Ma and Pa Investor who just received their third quarter statements in the mail. After sleepwalking through the first four years of this market rally, they’re finally ready to buy in now that they see those always-elusive market gains coming back to life.

Let’s check the stats to find out just where the super-bulls stand: 

“A particularly worrisome [measure] is the Investors Intelligence gauge of adviser sentiment. Its last reading showed that 55.2% of respondents were bullish and just 15.6% bearish, tying the highest difference between the two this year,” reads yet another WSJ report. “The last time the gap was bigger was April 8, 2011, which preceded the sharpest stock-market correction of the current bull market.”

Yikes.

On the other hand, there’s also evidence that investors are getting cautious as the broad market reaches toward new highs. 

According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Research, investors pulled $7.5 billion from U.S. equity funds last week. Financial and tech names lost the most coin as investors fled to money market funds…

RUD 11-11-13 Scared

While more investors are embracing the stock market as this year’s historic rally continues to unfold, there’s still a healthy amount of fear out there. 

Yes, our end-of-year momentum rally was put on hold late last week. But strong buying Friday proves we’re still in a “buy the dips” market for now. Sentiment extremes could continue to rattle the market as we head into the final stretch of 2013. But until price breaks down, the benefit of the doubt belongs to the rally…

Screen Shot 2013-11-11 at 12.56.44 PM

Screen Shot 2013-11-11 at 12.57.07 PM

RUD 11-11-13 Candles

“In the chart above, I’ve annotated the current long-term uptrend in grey,” Jonas continues. “But there’s another uptrend in play that’s marked off by the dashed blue trendlines. So, which one is the ‘correct’ uptrend for stocks? Well, both of them are right now…

“The fact that Mr. Market is hitting his head on resistance at that dashed line definitely gives me more confidence in its ability to hold the S&P’s price action this fall. But we’ll really see which of the two trends wins out on the next move back down to support.” 

Right now, Jonas is patiently stalking a new trade. Join him today so you won’t miss his next potentially profitable move

[Ed. Note: Send your feedback here: rude@agorafinancial.com – and follow me on Twitter: @GregGuenthner]

P.S. Starting November 18th we’ll be delivering the Rude Awakening to you from a different email address: rude@agorafinancial.comTo be sure you won’t miss a single issue, take the time to whitelist this address right now

And of course, we always welcome feedback from our readers. If you have any questions about this free subscription upgrade, send us an email atrude@agorafinancial.com

 

It may be hard to find someone as enthusiastic about precious metals mining as Sean Brodrick. A natural resource strategist with the Baltimore-based Oxford Club, an independent financial organization, Brodrick isn’t only filling his own portfolio with gold miners, he’s launching two new newsletters to research and vet resource stocks. While Brodrick might be putting his money where his mouth is, it’s not without solid reasoning and deep research, he explains in this interview with The Gold Report.

The Gold Report: Sean, over the next two months, you’ll be launching two different newsletters. The first one will be called Gold and Resource Trader. Why is now the right time to debut?

Sean Brodrick: It is a good idea because gold is generally hated right now. I like to look smart. One way to look smart is to buy things near a bottom and then hold onto them as they increase in value.

There is real value in the gold mining area. I ran a screen recently showing 25 miners trading on U.S. exchanges below book value. Some of them I wouldn’t buy, but some I would. This shows that real value is there. We are closer to the bottom than we were to the top, so now is a good time to get in.

TGR: Tell us about the second newsletter you’re going to launch in January?

SB: Oxford Resource Explorer is about energy, metals and other resources. It’s more energy focused because there are tremendous opportunities right now. If you told people 10 years ago that the U.S. would be producing at this level, you would have gotten some head shaking. They just wouldn’t have believed that.

The amazing stuff is what’s coming down the pike. The Gulf of Mexico is just kicking into high gear again. This shows how the natural resource market can turn on its head. People think they have the story figured out, and something comes along and changes the whole thing around. That’s why people are so bearish on gold. They think, well, that’s it, gold’s done; gold has had its day in the sun. No, it hasn’t. There are many good fundamental reasons for gold to go higher.

TGR: In some recent posts on your blog, King One Eye, you note that China is the driving force behind physical demand for gold, yet the central banks are on pace to buy almost half the gold they did in 2012. Does that trend concern you?

SB: Sure, it concerns me and it bears watching. But what the world’s central banks will buy is a guess. The proof is that Chinese demand for gold just keeps rising year over year. There’s extraordinary growth in China as millions join the middle class. And it’s not just China. There is lot of uplift in the whole economic atmosphere across Asia.

The central banks are important and I am absolutely keeping an eye on what they’re doing. But you have to understand why the central banks buy gold. They buy gold because they want to have something real and tangible, in case there’s ever a run on their currency or some other kind of financial crisis, to keep people from freaking out.

But there are some good reasons to freak out. We have quantitative easing, not just in the U.S. where it’s $85 billion/month, but around the world. The balance sheet of the whole of central banks system is now estimated to be more than $20 trillion by Bloomberg. Central banks keep buying gold because they are worried that some of those pigeons will come home to roost eventually.

TGR: Are higher gold prices necessary to make money in mining equities?

SB: Many companies do need the price of gold to go higher. Mining costs have been going up. Some companies that could make it on $400–500/ounce ($400–500/oz) during the last decade can’t anymore. There are low-cost miners out there. In fact, I love finding low-cost miners. Those are the companies I’ll be recommending to my subscribers in my new publication. But unless we see the price of gold go higher, we’re probably going to see even more large projects shut down.

Also, declining ore grades are putting pressure on companies. There used to be nice, rich gold ore that could be dug up cheaply. Now, companies are mining the gold ore that they used to drive over to get to the easy gold ore that they mined up. That’s the problem with gold. It’s a non-renewable resource. Ore grades are declining and costs are going up. That’s a one-two punch that means the price of gold needs to trend higher for companies to make money.

TGR: You’ve noted in your blog that you’re buying on the dips and pullbacks. What are you buying?

SB: What I’m seeking isn’t right for everyone. It depends on individual appetite for risk. Investors need to know their appetite for pain in an unforgiving market like this. If you don’t have an appetite for that, then you might just want to stick to exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

That said, I also like to buy individual companies because that’s where you’re really going to see the outperformance.

TGR: To that end then, Sean, you’re going to build a portfolio in Gold and Resource Trader. How are you going to structure it?

SB: I actually plan to include some of the larger caps. There are not that many large caps anymore. There are only about four mining companies that are still valued at more than $10B. I’ll also include the mid-cap range. But small caps are where I think the real value is.

I’m always looking for companies that have smart management so they can make it through hard times and reposition themselves for the next upswing.

TGR: What types of stories have caught your interest?

SB: There are such incredible values in producing miners that have exploration upside and will be likely adding to their resources and their production that I’m not picking up the developers at this point. I know some people are saying, “You should see how cheap the explorers are right now!” Yes, I know that. The explorers are super, super cheap. There are probably some that will do extraordinarily well, but I don’t need to raise my level of risk at this point. The producers are also so darn cheap, so why not just buy them?

TGR: But what about their all-in production costs?

SB: That’s a great point to bring up. I still see miners using cash costs of production. It makes me roll my eyes. I then have to go in and see what their all-in costs are. Investors know enough not to just go with the cash costs of production. They have to figure out what it is actually costing the miners by crunching the numbers.

Moreover, costs can fluctuate. For example, Mexico is going to move ahead with a 7.5% tax on miners. Now those companies will have to adjust their cost basis higher.

In this environment, some larger miners that had been planning on putting new projects into production when they thought the cost of gold was going to get to $2,000/oz very quickly are going to have to reassess. Many of them are also sitting on big, ol’ fat cash piles. They are going to buy these smaller producing miners that have resource upside and just move them right into their production pipelines. That’s one of the trends I hope to be playing because we will see some great mergers and acquisitions in that area.

TGR: That’s noteworthy because we certainly haven’t seen much of that to date.

SB: No, we haven’t. You can look at it two ways. No one is going to start doing mergers until the price goes higher. But the companies that wait that long aren’t really the ones you want to own. The miners you want to buy are the ones that are smart enough to buy something now, when things are so darn cheap and there are projects that are going for a song. They could be really mercenary and wait for another company to go out of business and then try to buy the project at a super-discount. But there’s no guarantee that they’ll actually get control of it because everybody is trying to do the same thing.

TGR: You’ll have more bidders.

SB: We’ll see some smart deals made at these prices because people will have their eye on the longer term. Smarter miners think about the longer term.

TGR: Are you still enthusiastic about Mexico as a jurisdiction given the impending tax situation?

SB: I was really keen on Mexico. We’ll have to see how that shakes out, though I think the bad news is priced in already.

Nicaragua is great. Parts of Canada are wonderful. You can get some real benefits for working in a place like Quebec that you can’t get somewhere else. I like parts of Africa as well. There are some opportunities in Turkey, Greece and Spain. They had historical mining and now they’re starting to examine those projects again.

Some places are heating up and you don’t want to go there—at least not at the present time. Nobody wanted to go to Peru when it had a really nasty political situation. Now it is becoming much more amenable to foreign investment. It’s actually looking like a good place to put money to work. On the other hand, Ecuador was pushed as the next place to be for a while. Now its government is getting kind of grabby. I wouldn’t want to be working in Ecuador right now.

The more politically upset the world gets and the more frothy with all this violence, new taxes, etc., the better North America looks. I think we have some great opportunities right around here.

TGR: What’s one helpful thought you can leave with our readers, Sean?

SB: The overall pessimism is overwhelming. I was speaking to a mining analyst recently—a sharp guy who has been at this for years. He was so pessimistic. He was talking about going off and doing something else because he just can’t take it anymore. When we see that kind of pessimism in anything, that’s a real contrary indicator that things might be about to move the other way.

There are three bullish forces for gold. First is global stimulus. We’re seeing the world’s central banks start to increase stimulus because they’re worried about economic growth as estimates have slowly lowered. Now, the banks are starting to pile in more stimulus. That generally tends to pump up the price of gold.

Second is selling by gold ETFs, which is starting to taper off. If that does taper off and end, then a major bearish force in the market will be lifted. That could really lift a weight off the price of gold rather quickly.

Third is the emerging middle class in Asia. It’s enormous. They want all the things we have, all the cars, the air conditioners, you name it, but they have a cultural affinity for gold. They don’t trust banks. That’s one thing they are going to buy.

You put those three things together and we could have a good year for gold in 2014.

TGR: Thanks for your time.

Sean Brodrick, a natural resources strategist for the Baltimore-based Oxford Club, travels far and wide seeking out investment values in the sector. A graduate of the University of Maine, Brodrick has more than 25 years of experience as a professional journalist and financial analyst. He is a regular contributor to InvestmentU.com and occasionally contributes to Dow Jones’ MarketWatch. Brodrick’s expertise has led to many financial talk show appearances. His book, “The Ultimate Suburban Survivalist Guide,” was published in 2010.

DISCLOSURE: 
1) Brian Sylvester conducted this interview for The Gold Report and provides services to The Gold Report as an independent contractor.
2) Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services or as sponsorship payment.
3) Sean Brodrick: I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview. 
4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent. 
5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.
6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.

Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2013 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.

Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.

Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.

Davos Without the Hookers

Screen Shot 2013-11-11 at 8.00.48 AM“Behind every great fortune there is a crime,” said Balzac. Before the age of capitalism – which gave people the means to build their fortunes without taking anything away from others – that was largely true. 

So, what lay behind the fortune which Anthony van Sallee used to buy up much of Long Island, New York, in the 17th century: larceny, murder, slavery? 

All of the above. This ancestor to the Vanderbilts… to the Whitneys… and through their mother to our own children was, in the language of Baltimore’s street life, “one mean motherf*****.” 

What did he do? Where was he from? The name gives us a clue… 

The “van” part is Dutch. Like most of New York’s early settlers, he carried the “van” which means “of” or “from” to tell us that he was from Sallee. 

But where is that? Ah. Check the map. You will find no Sallee anywhere near Amsterdam or Liege. In fact, it is not to be found anywhere in Europe. Instead, it is a city in North Africa. On what was known as the Barbary Coast, the center of the white slave trade. 

What follows is a discussion of involuntary servitude, capitalism and how to explain it to a hundred or so drunken Irishmen crammed into the back of a Kilkenny bar… 

A Strange Journey

Travel does not always take you where you want to go or where you expected to be. But you often end up where you ought to have gone in the first place. 

A recent trip took us to Kilkenny, Ireland, where we were to attend an economics festival called Kilkenomics, which can be loosely described as “Davos with jokes” or, perhaps more pertinently, as “Davos without the hookers.” 

In fact, it was not much like Davos in any way, except that a few people with PhDs in economics tried to tell others what to do. 

First, Kilkenny has little in common with Davos. The former is a tiny, quaint, medieval Irish city. The latter is a chic resort in the Swiss Alps. 

Second, the focus of the discussion at Kilkenomics was not on how to improve the world, but on how to give the limping Irish economy a boost. 

Third, the conference organizer – one of Ireland’s best-known and most savvy economists, David McWilliams – did not invite Janet Yellen or Paul Krugman. Instead, he invited your editor. (We took that as a sign of desperation. Or else there is something wrong with him. As a precaution, we avoided the tap water.) 

Kilkenny is a charmingly Irish city. There is a pub on every corner and two or three down the street. A man in need of another pint has only to haul himself a few steps in any direction. 

Even a few steps were too much for a couple of the girls we ran into on Saturday. They were dressed in the latest fashion for fat girls: tight white dresses cut off just below the crotch… and awkwardly balanced on high platform shoes (“arse-raisers” in the vernacular). 

It is hard enough to walk on stilts when you are sober. After three hours in Cleere’s bar, it is practically impossible. Coming out onto the street, they had scarcely gone three steps before they began listing dangerously. One caught a light-post and steadied herself. The other, no public utility within reach, sank to the street. There she lay, on the cobblestones, as we stepped over her. 

The Opening Salvo

We had just come from a discussion with economists. Every economist knows that people always act in their own rational self-interest. Since we couldn’t figure out any way in which the girl could benefit from laying in the middle of the street – in the rain… in a party dress hiked up to the very edge of decency – the girl could not exist. 

Inside Cleere’s, the discussion had been on the nature of capitalism. How could it be kept on the straight and narrow? This was the question we were meant to address. But the crowd had already been drinking for hours before we began. No two people had the same idea about what capitalism actually was. And our opponent was as well prepared as we with persuasive air. 

“These dreamers… these idealists… imagine a perfect world of commerce, invention, and freedom,” he began, pointing in our direction. 

“But it doesn’t work that way. In practice, they get a world where money talks… and it tells us all what to do. They preached deregulation… and brought about the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. 

“They’re always complaining about the government, but if it were not for the government this crisis would have turned into another Great Depression. Without the government, we’d all be completely unprotected against these greedy, rapacious rich people. 

“Besides, they would be nothing without the government. The government provides the infrastructure. It provides a system of laws and justice that makes it possible for them to earn their fortunes. 

“Government is the source of major innovations, too. It wasn’t the free market, for example, that developed the Internet; it was the government. Private companies were offered the opportunity to develop it themselves. They refused. Because they couldn’t figure out how to make a profit on it. 

“So I say, stop bellyaching about the government. Stop pretending that the free market is the source of all good things. And sit down and figure out how we can get these banksters off our backs… and make this mixed system, of capitalism with some measure of state control, work better.” 

This opening salvo drew a warm applause. He had scored a direct hit amidships. He had the drunks on his side. We hadn’t said a word and we were already taking on water. 

More tomorrow… 

Regards,

Bill

test-php-789