Timing & trends

Michael’s Sept 6th Comment. Insurance rates, government revenue and taxes.

CLICK HERE to listen

Trading Paper Gold Is Like Trading Sardines

goldsardinePeople say that selling in the Paper Gold market has hurt the Bullion market…perhaps it has but it reminds me of an old story from the New Orleans Seafood Exchange…which I think might provide a little perspective on today’s gold market.

A long time ago, way before people had color TV, there was a small town doctor who had a real passion for trading commodities. He had a tough old La Salle Street broker who tried to keep Doc on the straight and narrow. Over the years Doc had traded most of the grain markets, without much success. He’d tried cotton, but that didn’t seem to work for him, and he never could get the rhythm of the coffee and sugar market…but then…he discovered the Seafood Market and that seemed to fit him to a “T.”

CLICK HERE to read more

The market quietly awaited the August jobs report Friday with premarket trading and futures markets remaining little unchanged ahead of the reading. For the last while, this has been the foremost important monthly event that provides investors with some sort of indication into the direction of US Federal Reserve policy, and thus anticipation for the future course of financial markets. As the Wall Street Journal put it quite succinctly, it’s “the ever-so-brief moment the interests of Wall Street, Washington, and Main Street are all aligned on one thing: Jobs.” Of course as events unfold in Syria and the thought of a US led intervention has investors holding off on returning to the stock markets following a directionless summer, but without a catastrophic blow up in the Middle East, Fed policy will continue to guide markets.

To be upfront and clear, expectations for a September taper are now diminishing, and for the Fed to delay by one month would not be unlikely. Prolonged easing would be a friend of the equity markets as the gains since 2009 have been somewhat exponential thanks to the US Fed’s assistance. But it is the fact that the ever so moderate gains in US job creation are pointing towards sustained, albeit, minute improvement for their labour market. In reality, their labour market still leaves much to be desired. To look into the sectors where job gains are posted, they belong to the retail, service, and hospitality industries. Traditionally, these are sectors where growth is not indicative of an expanding economy. It would be optimal to see the employment in construction and manufacturing moving significantly higher.

Labour force participation, which is in my opinion one of the foremost important numbers to follow, is at its lowest level since August of 1978. And what this translates to is that the percentage of Americans that make up their labour force is diminishing. More and more Americans thus require some form of Social Security or assistance from government as fewer working Americans contribute to these government programs. This is one of the many structural problems the US faces, and these are the pertinent budgetary issues that continue to be left unaddressed over the long term.

The other big shift in the labour market has to do with downward revisions made to the estimate of job creation in the months prior. As the US created 169 thousand jobs in August, both June and July were revised down by a total 74 thousand jobs. Instead of averaging 170 thousand jobs created in the last 3 months—that number sits closer to 145 thousand. That’s fairly significant considering it was the improving prospects of the US labour market that was influencing the US Fed to taper asset purchases come September.

The idea of a September taper is now getting increasingly difficult to call by the day. And again, this has to do with the two aforementioned factors. The first being the questionable jobs data that comes out on a monthly basis and spans from unimpressive to mediocre. The second is the uncertainty created around a US led intervention in Syria. This really gives no indication what might happen in the days ahead, but on one thing we can be certain is the US in Syria has investors wanting to hold gold; moreover, any delay beyond expectations in terms of tapering asset purchases will drive demand for gold.

An Aside: The debate surrounding who should be the next Chairman of the US Federal Reserve is getting increasingly more ridiculous by the day. The seven appointed governors (including the chairman) of the Fed board all vote in unison and it’s the conditions of the economy that warrant and determine policy over the CV of the candidate. Where someone might have more influence on economic policy would be as the Secretary of the Treasury Department or as the Director of the National Economic Council for President Obama designing a TARP bailout package (posts Larry Summers has held). Thus, it’s a little surprising this debate over the qualities of Larry Summers is just happening now.

Click here to view the original article. 

A Cloudy Future for B.C. Employment

McIver Wealth Management Consulting Group / Richardson GMP Limited

Employment is one of the most important factors impacting the value of real estate investments in B.C., so it is worth a closer look at some of the recent news.

It was reported this morning that B.C. gained 6,200 jobs in August versus a loss of 11,700 in July. So, that equates to a net loss of 5,500 jobs over the summer. B.C.’s unemployment rate for August was at 6.6%, the same level it was at in August 2012. (It should also be pointed out that the jump in jobs in August was driven primarily by part-time employment which is not overly encouraging).

This is in contrast to the media coverage over the last couple of days about the growing demand for “trade” jobs in the province. These stories focused on the demand for trades people in the middle part of B.C. and how this has led to an overflow of applicants for trades training both at the high school and post-high school levels. BCIT is even considering “round-the-clock” classes to meet the influx!

Anecdotally, I have also witnessed the increased number of trades people, primarily construction, gathering for work in the downtown core as I walk to the office everyday around 6:00am.

So, employment in B.C. looks hot anecdotally, but looks rather anemic statistically. Why is that the case?

Well, I have a theory.

The visible growth in jobs – in the trades – is the result of increased investment spending. This is driven by historically low interest rates which are the result of global economic policies and forces. Also, for an economy, high-paying trades jobs are trophy jobs. They are going to get attention from local politicians and media.

The less visible area of the job market – part-time and lower-paid service sector employment – is waning because of a lack of growth in the underlying economy. Hiring costs, taxes, fees, tolls, cost of living, and real estate prices that have increased in B.C. over the last decade have burdened the economy. Additionally, over the last decade, growth in public-sector employment was dramatic, but that is no longer a growth engine because the province’s public sector payroll had become disproportionately large relative to the size of the provincial economy.

Overall, the province is treading water with respect to employment. Additionally, and somewhat concerning, the high-profile growth in the trades has been dependent on easy global monetary policies that have kept a lid on interest rates and have spurred visible investment spending. However, despite those policies, longer term market-determined interest rates have begun to move higher, increasing about 1.5% over the last year.  As a result, there is a risk that it may only be a matter of time until investment spending falls which will make the employment situation in the trades look more like the employment situation elsewhere in B.C.

 

 

The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Richardson GMP Limited or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. 

Richardson GMP Limited, Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund.

 Richardson is a trade-mark of James Richardson & Sons, Limited. GMP is a registered trade-mark of GMP Securities L.P. Both used under license by Richardson GMP Limited.

Is the Cult of Central Bankers Unraveling?

yield-spiral-diagramIn my experience, markets don’t deal well with several crises emerging at the one time. Give them just QE tapering and they may be able to adapt, but throw Syria and an Asian currency mess into the mix, and it can make for a wild ride. Underlying all of the recent volatility though is the first sign that investors are starting to doubt the omnipresent powers of central bankers. Ben Bernanke says there can be QE tapering without rising interest rates and bond markets revolt against that idea. Similarly, the new Bank of England chief Mark Carney says interest rates will remain low for the next three years and bond yields jump given better economic data and rising inflation.

CLICK HERE to read more