Bonds & Interest Rates

A Survivor’s Guide to the World of Funny Money

jhjhguyThe longer the world lives with its funny money, the funnier things get. 

Here’s a headline from yesterday’s Financial Times: “Central banks pour money into equities.” 

We paused. We collected our thoughts. And we wondered: What the hell? From the FT: “A cluster of central banking investors has become major players on world equity markets.” 

That was the conclusion of a central bank research and advisory group called the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF), which goes on to warn that this trend “could potentially contribute to overheated asset prices.” 

The OMFIF says “global public investors” have increased investments in equities “by at least $1 trillion in recent years.” Although it doesn’t say how that figure is split between central banks and other public sector investors, such as sovereign wealth funds and pension funds. 

The number could go much, much higher. The OMFIF says “central banks around the world, including China’s, have shifted decisively into investing in equities as low interest rates have hit their revenues.” 

Ironically, the shift by central banks into stocks is been driven by the ultra low bond-yield environment central banks have created. The OMFIF calculates that central banks around the world have lost out on $200 billion to $250 billion in interest income on their bond portfolios. 

A Tangled Web

We’ve devoted a good deal of the Diary to chronicling the tangled web of finance woven by central planners. We see curiosities aplenty – the sort people get up to when they have access to free money. 

It is against the law to manipulate stocks. But the Fed does it in broad daylight, lowering interest rates on bonds to increase the relative value of future earnings streams for the stock market (no matter how trickly and unreliable). 

And it seems to be working. The US stock market has hit all-time highs even as the source of its profits – the economy beneath it – struggles to find its footing. 

The intention – ostensibly – is to light a fire under the economy by pumping up the paper value of Americans’ stock market portfolios… encouraging them to go out and spend on flatscreen TVs, steak dinners and bigger, more expensive houses. 

Why the authorities think they know what other people should do with their money has never been fully revealed. Nor is it at all clear that the world would be a better place if people made riskier investments. 

Still, in today’s world nothing succeeds like failure. The Pentagon has not won a war in 60 years… but it keeps getting the go-ahead to enter another one. 

Central bankers’ record of failure is equally impressive. They never anticipate the trouble they cause… and can be fully relied upon to react in inappropriate and ineffective ways when the trouble starts. 

Now, central banks have been hoisted on their own petard. Thanks to their meddling with bond yields, they are now being forced to make up for shortfalls in income by investing in overpriced equities 

With money they create out of nowhere they buy equity stakes in companies. Otherwise, the companies might have been owned by real people… who earned real money providing real goods and services. 

And so, dear reader, more and more of the world’s real wealth shifts from the people who make it… to the people who take it. 

Regards, 

Bill

Further Reading: We recently attended a private meeting of the ultra-wealthy in London to find out how they manage to make and hold onto wealth in the world of funny money. It turns out they have a private set of “rules” to grow wealth that few people know about. If you want to find out the criteria the super-rich use to select investments – and how you can use it to build independent wealth – go here to learn more.

Market Insight:
What to Do Before Interest Rates Rise 

From the desk of Chris Hunter, Editor-in-Chief, Bonner & Partners

If you’re wondering what will follow the world of ultra-low interest rates, the answer is simple: higher interest rates. 

An ironclad rule of finance is that markets mean revert over time. In other words, when prices rise far above their average, they start to head back toward their average. And when they fall far below their average, they rise back to meet their average again. 

Same goes for the price of credit… 

Bloomberg reports that even Ben Bernanke believes the yield on the 10-year Treasury note is inevitably heading into the 3.5% to 4% range. 

That means anything priced off artificially depressed Treasury yields is going to run into major problems. 

That includes US stocks, which as Bill mentioned, are priced relative to the so-called “risk free” rate of return available to investors in the Treasury market. 

It also includes junk bonds. There’s no need to reach for a sub-5% yield in high-default-risk bonds when you can pick up that kind of yield up on a 10-year T-note. 

The consensus is the inflation and interest rate cycles are dead. And that higher inflation… and higher interest rates… are never coming back. 

We beg to differ. As investment legend Howard Marks of Oaktree Capital Management puts it: 

In investing, as in life, there are very few sure things. Values can evaporate, estimates can be wrong, and “sure things” can fail. However, there are two concepts we can hold with confidence. 

Rule number one: Most things will prove to be cyclical. 

Rule number two: Some of the greatest opportunities for gain or loss come when other people forget rule number one.

If you’re not already hedged for the end of the world of ZIRP and ultra-low inflation, make preparations now. 

Gold and exposure to energy-producing stocks are a great way to do that… while they’re still relatively cheap.

Let’s be clear on teacher strike

strikeCLICK HERE to read the comparison between what the BCTF is asking for and what the Employers are offering

No matter how the current school strike plays out let’s be clear on the outcome. Teachers will get a salary increase above the cost of living – the question is how big, which will automatically increases taxpayer contributions to teachers pensions. There will be more tax dollars for class composition and learning assistance – there will be more money for benefits, all they’re negotiating is how much more.

For people to say it’s not about the money is ridiculous. If the government had unlimited funds there’d be no dispute. The dispute is all about how much more money taxpayers will pay for salaries, benefits, class size reduction, class composition, extra Pro-D days and other paid days off. 

What it’s not about is changing the semi-monopoly in public education that guarantees that students will be used as pawns – and have been for the 27 years that teachers have had the right to strike.

It’s certainly NOT about measuring educational outcomes to assure the most efficient use of tax dollars. It’s NOT about getting the best teachers in the classroom.

By the way, contrast that with the landmark decision in California last week when the Superior Court ruled in favour of nine students who sued the State and the two biggest teachers unions over job protection and seniority policies that the court ruled undermine the quality of education by protecting the worst teachers at the expense of the most disadvantaged students.

In the ruling the judge said that the efforts to protect the worst teachers at the expense of the students “shocks the conscience.”

Obviously he’s not talking about the conscience of the union or the government.

How Do I Increase My Odds Of Success

sdfasdfase“You should think about how to increase the odds of success of each and every trade you make, every step of the trade.”

“You need to be diligent about following through on each trade you enter. Watch every position closely and follow your original plan for the trade.” – Editor Money Talks

….much more HERE

 

Bullish Record PM Shorting

The precious metals plunged last week, knifing through key support zones to unleash an explosion of bearish sentiment.This troubling heavy selling wasn’t news-driven, it emerged out of the blue.Who was dumping gold and why? Later data confirmed it was American futures speculators short selling gold and silver at record levels.Extreme shorting is very bullish, as these bets soon have to be covered.

The gold and silver price action has been exceedingly anomalous since early 2013.That’s when the Federal Reserve fomented a melt-up in the general stock markets, through both monetizing debt and jawboning implying it was backstopping stock prices.The levitating stock markets gradually sucked all life away from alternative investments including gold, which was crushed by epic selling of gold-ETF shares.

Western investors all but abandoned gold, leaving it solely at the mercy of American futures speculators.Their collective buying and selling always affects the gold price, but its impact is really amplified in this surreal world of withered investment demand.Since 2013’s extreme record gold-ETF selling petered out in early 2014, gold and silver prices have been utterly dominated by trading in the US futures markets.

Speculating in gold futures is a super-risky hyper-leveraged game.Last month the CME Group cut the margin requirements on gold and silver futures by 7.7% and 8.3%.Now traders only need to keep $6000 in their account to control a single 100-ounce gold contract, and $8250 for a 5000-ounce silver contract.And at $1250 gold and $19 silver, these contracts are worth a whopping $125,000 and $95,000 respectively.

Thus a speculator running minimum margin has maximum leverage of 20.8x in gold futures and 11.5x in silver futures.This is astoundingly high.In the stock markets, the Federal Reserve’s Regulation T has legally limited leverage to just 2.0xsince 1974.At 20.8x leverage, a relatively small 4.8% move in gold futures in the wrong direction from any speculator’s bet will wipe out 100% of the capital they risked!

So futures speculators simply can’t afford to be wrong for long, even if they aren’t running minimum margin.On Tuesday May 27th, they greatly expanded their bets that gold and silver prices would just keep drifting lower.So gold and silver plunged 2.1% and 1.9% that day, driving the final nail in the sentiment coffin for many precious-metals bulls.At the time, the source of this heavy selling wasn’t clear yet.

Futures speculators can sell PM futures, effectively adding supply and driving down prices, in two very different ways.They can liquidate longs, the worst kind of selling.Once traders sell their long gold and silver futures positions, they have no obligation to return.They can stay out for a long time, certainly not helping the precious metals’ prices.So paring longs can sometimes be a very bearish omen.

Futures speculators can also short sell PM futures, effectively borrowing the metals from someone else before dumping them.They hope to buy back the futures later at lower prices to repay their debts, pocketing the price drop as profit.But unlike long liquidations, short selling is very bullish because traders are under a legal contractual obligation to buy long contracts in the near future to cover their shorts.

Futures short selling is guaranteed near-future buying, as every single contract sold short has to be bought back which adds demand.This bullish covering occurs soonfor two reasons.First, given the extreme leverage inherent in gold and silver futures, speculators can’t risk being heavily short for too long.Second, futures contracts have built-in expiration dates.They have to be covered before those.

Thankfully the serious selling that crushed gold and silver last Tuesday was exclusively American speculators’ heavy futures short selling.We couldn’t know that until late last Friday afternoon, when the Commodity Futures Trading Commission released its weekly Commitments of Traders report on futures positions. Until 3:30pm Friday rolled around, I was worried last Tuesday was a long liquidation.

American stock traders, whose epic GLD-share selling was responsible for gold’s entire plunge last year, played no role in last Tuesday’s precious-metals breakdown.That day GLD’s gold-bullion holdings actually surged higher by 1.1% or 8.4 metric tons.That was their largest daily build in percentage terms since August 2011, and absolute tonnage terms since October 2012!Were stock traders buying gold?

I doubt it.The flagship GLD gold ETF’s mission is to track the gold price.So if stock traders weren’t selling GLD shares as fast as futures traders were dumping gold, GLD’s price would have decoupled to the upside.GLD’s custodians had to add new share supply to keep its price falling fast enough to keep pace with gold.So they issued new shares, and used the proceeds to buy more physical gold bullion.

Since GLD didn’t experience differential selling that breakdown day, American futures speculators had to be the culprit.And Friday’s CoT proved they were, on the short side.This first chart looks at the GLD price superimposed over speculators’ weekly total long and short positions in gold futures, taken from those CoT reports.When I saw this latest CoT data last Friday, my eyes nearly popped out of my skull.

Adam HamiltonBullish Record PM Shorting-2014-06-06-001.gif

…..more editorial & Silver chart HERE

 

FOURTH TURNING ACCELERATING

time1“In retrospect, the spark might seem as ominous as a financial crash, as ordinary as a national election, or as trivial as a Tea Party. The catalyst will unfold according to a basic Crisis dynamic that underlies all of these scenarios: An initial spark will trigger a chain reaction of unyielding responses and further emergencies. The core elements of these scenarios (debt, civic decay, global disorder) will matter more than the details, which the catalyst will juxtapose and connect in some unknowable way. If foreign societies are also entering a Fourth Turning, this could accelerate the chain reaction. At home and abroad, these events will reflect the tearing of the civic fabric at points of extreme vulnerability –problem areas where America will have neglected, denied, or delayed needed action.” – The Fourth Turning – Strauss & Howe – 1997

This past week saw an event revealing the cluelessness and ignorance of the linear thinking establishment. They are oblivious to the cyclicality of history and unaware of their precarious situation, as the mood of the country and the world portends their demise. Eric Cantor, the ultimate establishment neo-con Republican House Majority Leader, was crushed in a primary by a completely unknown economics professor, outspent by Cantor $4.9 million to $123,000. Cantor spent more at steakhouses than David Brat spent on his entire campaign. Cantor, a lackey for Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, Israel, and dozens of other mega-corporations, was the first House Majority leader defeated in a primary since the position was created in the 1890s. He won his last primary by 60%.

…..continue Reading at TheBurningPlatform.com…

test-php-789