Gold prices crashed Monday as panicked sellers drove the yellow metal to its lowest level since 2002 before recovering to a five-year low. More significantly, they broke the $1,130/oz. “floor,” which had previously been regarded as a solid support level – a key indicator to me that the downdraft wasn’t over. 

So I wasn’t surprised to see gold prices finish yesterday’s U.S. trading session modestly lower – but that doesn’t mean I was any less excited, either. 

You’re seeing an enormous opportunity being brought forth by the perfect storm of economic and financial events. Some of these events we’ve known were coming, and some are seemingly random. 

Either way, they’re creating an opening you haven’t had access to in years. 

Here’s what you need to know about what really caused gold’s plunge this week – and the opportunity no one can know when you’ll have again.

The Most Effective Attack
on Gold Prices in Years

Last Monday, traders sold an estimated 33 tonnes of gold in less than two minutes on the New York and Shanghai Exchanges. Their concerted actions sent gold prices crashing by nearly $50/oz. by the end of the day, a plunge of almost 5%. 

Contrary to what many believe, this was not simply “market action” taking its normal course. This was something far more sinister, concerted, and brilliantly executed – a “bear raid.” 

If you’ve just joined us, a bear raid is a highly technical tactic typically used by large institutional traders or “short and distort” artists. The goal is to create windfall profits though short sales, options, futures contracts, currencies, and whatever else can be brought to bear. 

If it works, the targeted stock, bond, currency, or in this case gold, plunges, allowing the short sellers to buy back shares or contracts they’ve borrowed and sold earlier at a huge discount. Typically, the sellers work together to establish a massive sale that overwhelms buyers and inflicts huge losses on anybody who’s long. 

In this case, traders took advantage of the fact that Japan’s markets were closed for a national holiday, knowing full well that absent their money, there were even fewer buyers than usual to mount a defense. 

And what a move it was! 

More than 3 million lots traded on the Shanghai Gold Exchange; a normal day is less than 30,000 lots by comparison. Anybody who tried to hang on got clobbered. 

These kinds of short attacks are nothing new – though this one was particularly severe. For example, we saw 5,000 December gold futures contracts with a notional value of $640 million dumped at market on October 11, 2013. This caused a five-minute sell-off during which more than $2 billion in gold futures traded hands according to the CME. It also caused a 10-second trading halt. 

That attack, like Monday’s, was carefully timed to exploit low-liquidity conditions. There were no economic reports or industry-significant events when it hit. There just happened to be a slew of stop-loss orders placed at $1,275 an ounce. 

As intended, the onslaught broke key support levels, took out the stop-loss orders, and created huge profits for the bear raiders. To this day we don’t know who the raiders were because they tend to cover their tracks. Still, a quick scan of the headlines at that time reveals who the interested parties may have been. Not surprisingly, it’s a pretty short list of players having the knowledge and the capacity to mount an attack. 

Is it any coincidence that Jeffrey Currie, who headed up commodities research in London for Goldman Sachs at the time, said only three days earlier – on October 8 – that gold was a “slam dunk” sell for the next year? Perhaps, but I’ll leave that to you to decide. 

Gold prices finished the day down more than 2.5%. 

A week later gold finished up 7.5%, to close at $1,361 per ounce as shrewd traders and investors saw the drop for what it really was… more Wall Street shenanigans. 

Honestly, it’s too early to tell if that’s the case now. The ease with which traders brought gold prices below its support levels tells me the downward drift isn’t over. 

And therein is your opportunity.

You Need Gold in Your Portfolio – but Not for the Reasons You Might Think

Exactly how much gold you should have in your portfolio is ultimately a question to be answered by you and perhaps your financial adviser. But there are some rules of thumb that can help investors reach a balance that’s close to ideal – and it also helps to clear up some common misconceptions along the way. 

Many investors think gold is good for portfolios because it’s a good hedge against inflation. This misconception mainly comes from memories of the 1970s, when gold prices grew by a jaw-dropping 2,300% at a time of rampant inflation. 

But correlation doesn’t mean causation. Contrary to what all those late-night TV commercials would have you believe, gold prices have never been a proven hedge against inflation. 

However, it has been proven to correlate to bond prices, which are, in turn, an indirect function of interest rates that are themselves an indirect inflation proxy. So what you really want to do is own gold because it hedges the value of your bonds. 

Studies suggest that having 3% to 5% of total investable assets in gold can provide meaningful protection against rising interest rates while also reducing overall portfolio volatility. 

If you’re game for a more sophisticated approach, consider buying $1 in gold for every $10 you have invested in bonds. That will allow your money to approximate the 10-to-1 relationship that’s historically existed between gold prices and interest rates vis-à-vis bonds. 

As for what kind of gold, that varies considerably and is a function of personal risk tolerance, objectives, and suitability. Some people like bullion while others prefer choices like Perth Mint Certificates that help alleviate storage and insurance issues. Even jewelry can be good.

For most investors, though, simpler is better. 

Over the years, I’ve recommended SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE:GLD) because it’s a highly liquid ETF that directly tracks to price of gold. If you’re hoping to profit from gold prices’ inevitable rebound, it’s hard to get much simpler than that. 

If you have concerns about whether or not there’s enough gold to back GLD as some investors do, consider an alternative like the Physical Swiss Gold Shares ETF (NYSE:SGOL). It’s a U.S.-listed exchange traded fund offering shares that are physically backed by gold stored in secure Swiss vaults. 

At the end of the day, get past the fact that we’re talking about gold and get your emotions out of the picture. Doing so will allow you to treat it just like any other asset class. 

While you’re at it, think about what Ray Dalio, who founded Bridgewater Associates, one of the world’s largest hedge funds, had to say… 

“If you don’t own gold… you don’t know history or you don’t know the economics of it.” 

Until next time,
Keith Fitz-Gerald
Chief Investment Strategist
Money Morning 

“The world of finance as we know it is highly centralized. Anytime you buy a Starbucks coffee or pay your electric bill, the funds pass through a heavily congested financial highway that is exclusively controlled by the banks.

All the money is funneled through their system. It’s expensive. Inefficient. And incredibly outdated.

Think about an international wire transfer—the funds flow from one bank, to a larger bank, to an even larger bank (typically in New York), and back down to smaller banks on the receiving end.

And everyone takes a fee along the way.

This is ridiculous in 2015. The technology already exists to eliminate all of the middle men and allow transactions to pass directly between a buyer and seller.”

….read it all HERE 

(note: no problem reading the article and listening to the 28 minute podcast, be aware there is a further Video at the bottom that requires your email, and an email confirmation process to watch – Money Talks Editor)