Uncategorized

8 ways to hold back the hands of time

8-ways-to-boost-health While the world continues its search for the elusive fountain of youth, you can get a jump start on reclaiming the vitality of your early years by following nutrition expert Lisa Petty’s eight-step program. Start today for a more vibrant tomorrow.

1. Add more H2O
Let’s begin with an easy one: Drink water. It’s a health heavyweight – regulating temperature, transporting nutrients to organs and tissues, shuttling oxygen to cells, removing waste, and protecting joints and organs. Too little water leads to joint and muscle pain, headaches, constipation and thirst, as well as dry and wrinkle-prone skin.

MAKE CHANGE TODAY  To calculate your water needs, divide your body weight in pounds by half: this equation gives you the number of ounces to consume each day. And remember, about 20% of our daily intake comes from fruits and vegetables, so add hydrating stars like tomatoes, cucumbers and lettuce to your menu.

2. Embrace fat
Our current fat phobia has it (mostly) wrong. While hydrogenated and trans fats are linked to high cholesterol and heart disease, we actually require specific fats for optimum health and longevity.

The omega 3 fats EPA and DHA that come from fish oil are essential for good metabolism. They are also key to preserving cognitive function, memory and concentration. Plus, omega 3 fats create plump and age-defying skin cells, thereby reducing the look of wrinkles.

MAKE CHANGE TODAY  The best way to pump up your intake is to include deep water fatty fish like salmon and sardines three times per week. Nuts, seeds and fortified foods offer some omega 3 fats, too, but because our bodies can’t convert them as easily, they aren’t the best source.

….read 3 – 8 HERE

2014 World Outlook Financial Conference

Agenda

         Coming soon.

Truly worth the wait… a very exciting list of speakers and topics will be posted here soon – you won’t believe what we have in store for you this year. Prepare yourself for the next generation of huge-growth investment opportunities

Budget Impasse

thomassowellEven when it comes to something as basic, and apparently as simple and straightforward, as the question of who shut down the federal government, there are diametrically opposite answers, depending on whether you talk to Democrats or to Republicans.

There is really nothing complicated about the facts. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives voted all the money required to keep all government activities going — except for ObamaCare. This is not a matter of opinion. You can check the Congressional Record.
As for the House of Representatives’ right to grant or withhold money, that is not a matter of opinion either. You can check the Constitution of the United States. All spending bills must originate in the House of Representatives, which means that Congressmen there have a right to decide whether or not they want to spend money on a particular government activity.

Whether ObamaCare is good, bad or indifferent is a matter of opinion. But it is a matter of fact that members of the House of Representatives have a right to make spending decisions based on their opinion.

ObamaCare is indeed “the law of the land,” as its supporters keep saying, and the Supreme Court has upheld its Constitutionality. But the whole point of having a division of powers within the federal government is that each branch can decide independently what it wants to do or not do, regardless of what the other branches do, when exercising the powers specifically granted to that branch by the Constitution.

The hundreds of thousands of government workers who have been laid off are not idle because the House of Representatives did not vote enough money to pay their salaries or the other expenses of their agencies — unless they are in an agency that would administer ObamaCare.

Since we cannot read minds, we cannot say who — if anybody — “wants to shut down the government.” But we do know who had the option to keep the government running and chose not to. The money voted by the House of Representatives covered everything that the government does, except for ObamaCare.

The Senate chose not to vote to authorize that money to be spent, because it did not include money for ObamaCare. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says that he wants a “clean” bill from the House of Representatives, and some in the media keep repeating the word “clean” like a mantra. But what is unclean about not giving Harry Reid everything he wants?

If Senator Reid and President Obama refuse to accept the money required to run the government, because it leaves out the money they want to run ObamaCare, that is their right. But that is also their responsibility.

You cannot blame other people for not giving you everything you want. And it is a fraud to blame them when you refuse to use the money they did vote, even when it is ample to pay for everything else in the government. When Barack Obama keeps claiming that it is some new outrage for those who control the money to try to change government policy by granting or withholding money, that is simply a bald- faced lie. You can check the history of other examples of “legislation by appropriation” as it used to be called.

Whether legislation by appropriation is a good idea or a bad idea is a matter of opinion. But whether it is both legal and not unprecedented is a matter of fact.

Perhaps the biggest of the big lies is that the government will not be able to pay what it owes on the national debt, creating a danger of default. Tax money keeps coming into the Treasury during the shutdown, and it vastly exceeds the interest that has to be paid on the national debt. Even if the debt ceiling is not lifted, that only means that government is not allowed to run up new debt. But that does not mean that it is unable to pay the interest on existing debt.

None of this is rocket science. But unless the Republicans get their side of the story out — and articulation has never been their strong suit — the lies will win. More important, the whole country will lose.”

In August 1973, Jan-Erik Olsson walked into the main branch of Kreditbanken bank in central Stockholm, Sweden and attempted to rob the place at gunpoint. 

He failed miserably. When the police arrived in short order, Olsson opened fire and injured one of the cops. This only escalated the situation. 

In desperation, Olsson took four people hostage, and they were held for six days at the bank until police finally used gas to subdue the captors. 

This sort of thing happens all the time, so it’s hardly noteworthy. But what’s unique about this event is that the hostages later said they actually felt safer with their captors than the police. 

The victims had, in fact, become emotionally attached to Olsson and his partner, to the point that they even publicly defended the pair after the ordeal was over. 

As it turns out, this is actually fairly common. Psychologists call this ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ after the Kreditbanken robbery; the term denotes a traumatic, positive bond that forms between captors and hostages. 

To those of us who have never been held hostage, it almost seems fantastical… even intellectually offensive. Seriously, how could anyone ever develop endearing feelings for someone holding you at gunpoint? 

But when you think about it, this is the very nature of patriotism. 

Through an entire lifetime of bombastic propaganda, complete with songs and flags and parades, people develop an unquestioning commitment to the state. 

They’ll say things like ‘this is the freest country in the world’ without a shred of objective evidence to support that conclusion… and overwhelming evidence to the contrary. 

But meanwhile, we’re all held at gunpoint. 

Spy agencies monitor our phone calls and emails. Central bankers manipulate markets and destroy people who are responsible enough to save. 

Politicians confiscate people’s livelihoods, regulate them to the hilt, authorize discretionary assassination of their own citizens, and actively work to destroy any vestiges of personal liberty. 

While everyone is allowed to roam around, work, and buy flat-screen TVs, we’re all ultimately handcuffed by the state. Everything in our entire lives– from the value of our savings to our homes and personal property, to even our personal freedom– can all be confiscated in their sole discretion. 

I’d be willing to bet the chickens scratching around my yard right now think that they’re free… and have no idea that they’ll be this evening’s dinner. 

This is a hostage situation, plain and simple. 

Yet they’ve skillfully managed to create bonds of affection. The hostages are standing tall, waving the flag, and defending the government’s absurd, destructive actions… no matter how much they defy reality. 

It’s gotten to the point that the hostages have begun talking about government actions in the first person: 

‘There’s no way “we” would ever default…’ 

‘In this country “we’re” innocent until proven guilty…’ 

‘Airport security makes “us” safer from terrorists…’ 

‘WE should invade Iran…’ 

Hostages have become so inured to the violence of our captors that few people even realize that it’s happening. The fear and intimidation tactics have just become part of daily life. 

This is really hazardous thinking. Hostage situations are dangerous. When things start getting bad, the captors become desperate and start sacrificing their prisoners. 

Candidly, our courses of action are limited. 

One can simply hope that the situation will improve, and that you won’t be one of the hostages that gets slaughtered. 

Conversely, you can head towards the big, giant EXIT sign and leave the whole situation behind for greener pastures. 

Or, you can bear down and stick it out… but at least have a credible escape plan. Reduce your exposure to the captors. Don’t have all of your eggs in one basket. 

It costs you nothing, for example, to move a portion of your savings abroad to a safe, stable bank in a jurisdiction that your home government does not control. 

It costs you nothing to pursue an ‘ancestry’ passport in the event that your parents or grandparents hailed from certain countries like Ireland or Italy. 

Yet in the event that the hostage crisis escalates, it’s these sorts of steps that will end up paying enormous dividends for you… and pave the way to freedom.

 

 
Until tomorrow, 
Signature 
Simon Black 
Senior Editor, SovereignMan.com
 
 
Neither this email communication nor content posted to the website SovereignMan.com is intended to provide personal financial advice. Before undertaking any action described in this letter, financial or otherwise, you should discuss your options with a qualified advisor– accountant, financial planner, attorney, priest, IRS auditor, Tim Geithner… Also, nothing published in this letter constitutes encouragement to avoid or evade tax obligations in your home country. Furthermore, you should understand that SovereignMan.com may in some instances receive financial compensation for products and/or services which are mentioned in the letter, and in other cases, SovereignMan.com receives no compensation. The needs of the community come first, and the presence or lack of financial compensation in no way affects the recommendations made in this letter.

Inspiring, Incredible & Bloody Impressive

Screen Shot 2013-10-03 at 10.31.28 AM
The extraordinary life of Richie Parker, who overcame being born without arms to become a chassis and body component designer for Hendrick Motorsports.

test-php-789