Stocks & Equities

CHART OF THE DAY: S&P 500 Earnings Are Way Cleaner Today Than They Were During The Financial Crisis

When a company announces quarterly earnings, analysts and investors often focus on the non-GAAP or adjusted earnings number.

These adjusted numbers exclude items that management deems not reflective of ongoing operations.

For example, if a company has to write-off equipment or the value of certain financial securities, earnings will take a hit.  But the adjusted number will add back this negative impact.

Critics argue that adjusted earnings obscure the true nature of corporate profitability

In a new report examining corporate profits, UBS strategist Julian Emanuel notes argues that earnings quality has improved significantly since the financial crisis.

He included this chart of S&P 500 company write-offs, which are down sharply.

“Broadly speaking, earnings are cleaner – and the big spike in write-offs on 2009 is primarily due to distress in the Financial sector,” wrote Emanuel in an email to Business Insider.

There’s always something being written off in corporate America. More recently, the noise appears to be coming from the basic materials sector, an industry plagued by falling commodity prices and too much capacity.

But like Emanuel said, earnings are cleaner.

cotd-92

Follow Markets Chart Of The Day and never miss an update! – Click HERE scroll down and input your email. 

 

Good morning. Here’s what you need to know. 

  • Asian markets were all down in overnight trading. Japan’s Nikkei fell 0.62%; Hong Kong’s Hang Seng, 1.71%; and the Shanghai, 1.49%. Europe, on the other hand, was slightly up, but U.S. futures were pointing lower.
  • In a rare moment of bipartisanship, Democrats and Republicans agreed on a budget last night, preventing a repeat of October’s government shutdown with weeks to spare. The deal — reached by Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) — was immediately hailed by both President Obama and Speaker Boehner. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 “sets discretionary spending levels a little above $1 trillion for the next two years, while repealing and replacing some cuts of sequestration,” our Brett LoGiurato explains. “In fiscal year 2014, spending is set at $1.012 trillion, which sits about halfway between the proposed levels of the House and Senate budgets. Current law under sequestration calls for caps of $967 billion.” The deal still has to pass both chambers by January 15.
  •  
  • It seems we have Obamacare to thank for saving the U.S. economy. As our Joe Weisenthal writes, “Because Obamacare has rolled out terribly, Obama’s approval ratings are in the toilet. This is a very welcome turn of events for the Republican party, which just over a month ago was in the toilet itself approval-wise. Republicans now have a good hand to play going into next November, and the only way they could obviously screw it up is by doing something stupid like shutting down the government again. So it appears that Republicans are content now to just not rock the boat and get to the next election which they hope will be a big one for them thanks to Obamacare.”
  • This budget deal was timely, because at 2:00 p.m. ET the U.S. government will make its monthly budget statement. Economists expect the Treasury to report a budget deficit of $140 billion. Of course, a quiet trend this year has been that the deficit has been shrinking.
  •  
  • German consumer price index (CPI) came in at 0.2% month-over-month and 1.3% year-over-year, meeting analyst expectations. The German economy has continued to outperform its European neighbors. Earlier this month, the country’s manufacturing sector saw its strongest month since the summer of 2011.
  •  
  • On the opposite end of the European spectrum, Greece reported an unemployment rate of 27.4%, up from 27.3% the previous two months. That rate is more than double the Eurozone average.
  •  
  • A lucrative Bitcoin arbitrage opportunity in China has all but disappeared in recent days. “Traders could earn profits by buying bitcoins using dollars on a foreign exchange such as Mt. Gox, reselling them for yuan at the higher price on BTC China, the main local exchange, and finally converting the yuan back to dollars,” reports Reuters’ Gabriel Wildau. “In recent days, however, the spread between bitcoins as priced in yuan and those priced in dollars has disappeared” after the Chinese government released a statement forbidding local banks from dealing with the digital currency.
  •  
  • Italian Prime Minister Enrico Letta asked parliament to support his government and back a spate of reforms he said would boost the country out of the economic doldrums. “He promised to rein in the deficit, cut Italy’s towering public debt, the second highest in the euro zone as a proportion of the overall economy, lower taxes on families and companies, reduce unemployment and boost public investment,” Reuters’ James Mackenzie reported. “Privatizations would continue and the government would consider allowing employees to buy shares in the post office and other public companies, he said.”
  •  
  • Costco will report earnings earnings today. Market analysts expect the company to post an EPS of $1.02, up from $0.95 a year ago, and revenue of $25.34 billion on the quarter. Last fiscal year, Costco netted $2.3 billion on membership fees, making up about 75% of its operating income. That huge figure allows the retailer to charge less and tempt customers looking to save money.
  •  
  • Government regulators approved the Volcker rule yesterday, a long-in-the-making measure that limits trading activity — specifically proprietary trading activity — at U.S. banks. Standard & Poor’s estimates that the rule could shave off $10 billion in yearly pretax profit from the eight largest banks. At 953 pages, “Sure a lot of the Volcker rule is highly over-engineered checklists and admonitions that boil down to ‘don’t be dumb,’ and sure there are good theoretical arguments against that sort of regulation, but I don’t know, come on. You shouldn’t be dumb,” wrote Bloomberg’s Matt Levine. “You could do a lot worse than a rule that requires you to think about what you’re doing.”

To Get These Updates In Your Mailbox Every Morning, Click HERE, scroll down and input your email. 

 

The One Topic No One Is Discussing

imagesEarlier, Deutsche Bank’s iconoclast Jim Reid dared to point out the painfully obvious: that something has drastically changed since the Great Financial Crisis (what that “something” is, is clear to all those whose year end bonus does is not contingent on never pointing out the printerphant in the room). This time around, instead of looking back, he looks forward, to the year 2014, and brings up the two questions nobody dares to ask: i) what happens if 2014 is the year when the recession can no longer be delayed, and ii) how will the Fed, already having doubled down on every last “bullet” in its arsenal, use monetary policy to provide a burst of growth when even $85 billion in flow per month is no longer enough…

From Deutsche Bank’s Jim Reid

The curveball for 2014 – A US recession

…continue reading HERE

Gold Stocks Nearing Bottom

In early November we made the case that precious metals were in danger of a final plunge before a bottom. The decline that ensued has abated in recent days. It appears that a short-term rally is underway. The bear market is very close to ending but we can’t say definitively just yet.

 The chart below shows all of the worst bear markets in gold stock history. For the current bear market (black) we replaced the HUI Gold Bugs index with the XAU index. The reason is the XAU is a better reflection of the historical Barron’s Gold Mining Index (BGMI). The HUI is more volatile. This chart suggests that if the gold stocks have not bottomed yet, they are damn close.

(Ed Note: I have done a bit of searching and found that if you go here the charts are much more visible)

Screen Shot 2013-12-11 at 6.21.48 AM

A similar conclusion can be made upon examination of the monthly chart of the HUI Gold Bugs Index and GDM Index (father of GDX). GDM bounced from a level of support that dates back to 2004.

dec10gsmonthly

While the mining stocks by themselves appear to be very close to a major bottom, the metals are creating some uncertainty. I know that some will be quick to call a double bottom but I would be more cautious. A double bottom typically explodes off the second bottom. Part of the reason is the first rally typically isn’t so strong and the market then declines without interruption to the double bottom. That is not the case here. Gold has strong resistance at $1350 and $1400. To validate a double bottom Gold would need to immediately rocket higher and through $1400. I don’t see that happening.

dec10edgold

In looking at the history of cyclical declines in Gold we find that the shorter declines tend to end with a strong selloff as was the case in 1976 and 1985. The current decline is most similar to those two.

dec10GoldCorrections

The bulk of the evidence leads me to believe that we probably have not seen the bottom though we are very close. In contrast to Gold, the mining stocks appear to have very limited downside potential. It’s difficult to make a case that they can move much lower. Gold, on the other hand, which last closed at $1261 doesn’t have strong support until the 50% retracement at $1085 and the 12-year trendline slightly above $1100. The worst is over for the mining stocks but we don’t know that to be the case with Gold.

Bottoms can happen in an instant or develop through a basing process. Huge immediate rebounds originate from extreme oversold conditions. We don’t have that at the moment. The corollary is that precious metals spend the next few months in a basing process. The bottom line is there is no need to aggressively buy yet unless the market becomes extremely oversold and plunges to a new low. Wait for that to happen and if it doesn’t, then a base is likely developing. Another thing to note is that the gold stocks started the bull market in November 2000 while Gold bottomed three months later. If you’d be interested in more of this analysis and the companies poised to rocket out of this bottom then we invite you to learn more about our service.

Good Luck!

Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT

Jordan@TheDailyGold.com

 

About The Daily Gold

Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT is a Chartered Market Technician and member of the Market Technicians Association. He is the publisher and editor of TheDailyGold Premiuma publication which emphasizes market timing and stock selection for the sophisticated investor, as well as TheDailyGold Global, an add-on service for subscribers which covers global capital markets. From 2010 through September 2013 The Daily Gold Premium Model Portfolio was up 83% compared to GDX (-39.2%) and GDXJ (-52.0%). The Model Portfolio which focuses entirely on gold and silver stocks also dramatically outperformed the S&P 500 (+48.5%) in spite of the S&P 500 dramatically outperforming gold and silver stocks.

Contact: Jordan @ TheDailyGold.com

 

Forget Tesla, THIS is the Future!

The snow fell hard and steady yesterday morning.

Our street was populated with a handful of early risers sweeping off a few inches of wet powder from their idling cars.

Fortunately, I worked from home, so I wasn’t among those fighting the morning arctic bite, stressing out over whether or not the roads would be an ice skating rink.

Of course, it really wasn’t all that bad.  After all, it wasn’t long ago that the city of Baltimore stood vulnerable to nearly four feet of the white stuff, leaving most daily commuters outside of the city trapped indoors.

As for me, I was merely two blocks from the light rail station. And even with a knee-high blanket of snow, the trains were running smoothly. They were a bit more crowded than usual, but that’s really been a solid trend over the past five or six years anyway.

Truth is, in most major cities throughout the nation, ridership on public transportation has risen steadily.

I suspect much of this started back when oil crossed $140 a gallon and the high cost of 87 octane forced a lot of folks to re-examine the financial benefits of public transportation. But even after oil prices plummeted and the price of gasoline fell back within an affordable range, quite a few commuters chose to continue their daily commutes in the comfort of a warm train or bus, reading the newspaper or kicking back while letting someone else deal with morning rush hour.

My friends, I don’t think this is just some random event. In fact, I believe we will continue to see this as a long-running trend going forward. And the result could mean an opportunity for all of us to make a nice bit of cash along the way.

More Than Half the Population

Last week, the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) released a new report highlighting this transition away from the car and toward public transportation in 100 of the nation’s largest cities.

According to the report, from 2006 to 2011, the average number of miles driven per U.S. resident fell in nearly 75 percent of the nation’s largest urbanized areas, while most urbanized areas saw increases in public transportation use and bicycle commuting. As well, researchers found that the share of households owning a car has actually decreased.

While not everyone lives in urban areas, it’s important to note that the cities cited in this report are home to more than half of the U.S. population. And folks in the cities below are providing excellent indicators for investors looking to profit from the transportation sector.

Take a look at the map PIRG highlighted in its report.  It details the decline in vehicle miles traveled from 2006 to 2011.

trasnspo-map

The Numbers

Some of the key findings in PIRG’s report are actually quite surprising, even for a guy like me, who thoroughly enjoys the benefits of public transportation. These include the following:

 

  • The proportion of workers commuting by private vehicle – either alone or in a carpool – declined in 99 out of 100 of the largest urbanized areas in the United States between 2000 and 2011.

  • The proportion of residents working from home has increased in 100 out of the 100 largest urbanized areas since 2000.

  • The proportion of household without cars increased in 84 out of the 100 largest urbanized areas from 2006 to 2011.

  • The proportion of households with two cars or more decreased in 86 out of the 100 largest urbanized areas.

 

While this data is intriguing, it does beg one question: why the change?

Researchers give a number of reasons for this, three of which are worth mentioning here. And bear with me, because there is a point to all of this…

  1. After decades of increase, the number of vehicles per licensed driver has declined by four percent since 2006, suggesting that Americans may have reached a limit on the number of vehicles for which they have a need. I discussed this a few years ago after we started noting some very significant growth in the car sharing industry.

  2. After peaking in 1992, the percent of driving-age Americans holding licenses has stagnated and then declined. By 2011, 86 percent of driving-age Americans held licenses. This is the lowest percentage in thirty years.

  3. Americans may also be hitting their limit on the amount of time they’re willing to spend in their cars each day. And unless travel speeds increase – which they haven’t since the 1990s – they may be hitting their limit on the number of miles they’re willing to drive each day.

Another interesting finding shows that the share of Americans in the labor force has dropped from a peak of 67.3 percent in 2000 to 63.2 percent – the lowest level since 1978.

Whatever the reason, I don’t expect to see these trends peter out anytime soon. So we’re certainly interested in the companies behind the integration of mass transportation.

No Small Players

When it comes to mass transit, there really are no “small” players.  Even if there were, I’d be hesitant about getting too giddy over them. After all, in the world of trains and buses, there’s no room for amateurs. This is a capital-intensive industry with little room for error.

The major players in this space include:

  • Alstom (PINK SHEETS: AOMFF)

  • Siemens (NYSE: SI)

  • Bombardier (TSX: BBD-A)

  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (PINK SHEETS: MHVYF)

  • Harsco (NYSE: HSC)

  • Timken (NYSE: TKR)

  • LB Foster (NADAQ: FSTR)

As well, be on the lookout for new robotic technologies entering the public transportation sector.

Assistive robots are already used on light rail trains and buses, and robotic “drivers” are being tested right now. Security robots are used to sniff out danger along rail lines. And robots in mass transit may actually take some of the human error out of the equation, too – think tired or distracted drivers.

A list of public robotic companies can be found by clicking this link. And if you’d like to see some video detailing both the integration of robots and the profitability of robot investing, click here.

To a new way of life and a new generation of wealth…

jeff-siegel-signature

 

 

Jeff

 

 

The Bottom Line

 

Related Articles

 
Recently…

 
Let the Boom Times Roll

This Will Be a Game Changer

Sneak Attack on U.S. Pipelines!

From OPEC to NO-PEC

Investing in Next Generation Sequencing

 

 

Energy and Capital, Copyright © 2013, Angel Publishing LLC, 111 Market Place #720, Baltimore, MD 21202. All rights reserved. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. Energy and Capital does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn’t want it. If you’re not sure why you’re getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info here, including our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription.

 

 

 

test-php-789