Gold & Precious Metals
How he did it is explained below. It is an interesting technique, as well as pretty simple and easy to replicate as described in full below. There is an offer at the bottom that invites you to sign up for a free week of usage to test it out as a stock selector. I have to assume anyone who signs up for a Free Week of usage will be followed by an automatic charge should you select to make no attempt to cancel your Free Week on time. The do offer a money back guarantee however and thus interesting to anyone who is genuinely interested in a proven stock picking technique that is easy to do – Editor Money Talks
How Peter Lynch Earned 29% a Year for 13 years
When it comes to true investing legends, Peter Lynch is in a league of his own.
The former head of Fidelity’s flagship Magellan Fund produced an annualized rate of return of 29.2% over his 13-year stint at the helm. This track record secured his place as the best mutual fund manager of all time.
So how did he do it? It’s not as complicated as you think…
In his best selling book, One Up On Wall Street, Lynch revealed a powerful charting tool that greatly simplified his investment decisions.
Deemed the “Peter Lynch chart”, this simple graph plots the stock price against its “earnings line” – a theoretical price equal to 15 times the earnings per share.
When a stock traded well below it, he would buy. When it rose above it, he would sell.

Not exactly rocket science, is it?
The idea behind this technique is simple. Lynch (and most other successful money managers) believe that mature, stable companies are worth roughly 15 times their annual earnings. And over the last 135 years, this has proven to be the mean valuation of the S&P 500 index.
This is known as a the P/E ratio. It is merely the price of the stock divided by its earnings per share. The resulting multiple represents how many times you are paying for last year’s earnings at today’s stock price.
All things being equal, the lower the number the better. Low P/E ratios mean that you are getting more earnings for your investment dollar. And since most large cap stocks eventually trade for at least 15 times earnings, you are more likely to see your shares appreciate as they return to the 15 P/E level.
This simple idea was the basis of Lynch’s investment approach and the reason he created his now famous chart.
The chart consists of only two lines. The first is the stock price. The second is the hypothetical stock price if it were to trade at a P/E of 15 (the earnings line). As Peter Lynch explained,
“A quick was to tell if a stock is overpriced is to compare the price line to the earnings line. If you bought familiar growth companies – such as Shoney’s, The Limited, or Marriott – when the stock price fell well below the earnings line, and sold them when the stock price rose dramatically above it, the chances are you’d do pretty well.”
Take Walgreens (WAG) for example. The Peter Lynch chart below shows a 10-year history of the stock price and the earnings line.

Most nvestors who bought the stock when it was trading above its earnings line experienced very small gains or even losses. However, buying Walgreens at any price below the earnings line led to sizable gains.
The same pattern can be found with almost any familiar US stock. Oracle (ORCL) and Wal-Mart (WMT) are all shown below:


It is a well-known fact among investors that price follows earnings. Over multi-year periods, stock prices move in sync with changing company earnings.
But over the short term, stock prices are unpredictable. This creates valuable oportunities for savvy investors and turns the Peter Lynch Chart into PURE GOLD! Using the chart on any of the stocks above would have produced some very impressive gains.
GuruFocus is one of the only places to access this powerful tool.
Try it for FREE:
- Input a stock symbol in the search bar in the top left corner of the homepage.
- Select ‘Interactive Chart’ from the dropdown list.
- Just below the Interactive Chart tab is a ‘User Defined Chart’ menu.
- Select ‘Peter Lynch Chart’ and the rest is done automatically.
We encourage you to give it a try. Check your own stocks or look for new opportunities. Free members can chart up to 5 stocks at no charge.
Premium members receive UNLIMITED access to this tool along with countless other alerts, scanners, rankings and investment newsletters.
Given the potential cost of buying stocks at the wrong time, our $297 annual membership might be the safest investment you ever make.
CLICK HERE to Learn More about GuruFocus Premium Membership
GuruFocus.com Membership Services
Not a Member Yet?
Take a 7-day Free Trial of Premium Membership. It is risk FREE.
Satisfaction Guaranteed!
If you’re not 100% delighted with the Premium Membership, just let us know. There’s a money-back guarantee with this purchase!
GuruFocus.com Membership Services.
Nothing to report from Wall Street. Dow down a little yesterday. Gold up a little. The most telling stories are coming from the world economy, not its manipulated markets.
The price of copper is collapsing. The Baltic Dry Index is dragging along the bottom. Seven years after the start of the debt crisis the global economy is still struggling.
Hedge-fund-turned-family-office-manger George Soros says Europe could be in for a 25-year slump. Bloomberg reports:
Billionaire investor George Soros said Europe faces 25 years of Japanese-style stagnation unless politicians pursue further integration of the currency bloc and change policies that have discouraged banks from lending.
Europe “may not survive 25 years of stagnation,” Soros said in the interview with Francine Lacqua.
It was in the spring of 2007 that the first crack appeared in the weakest part of the debt structure: US subprime mortgages. By March 2007 the value of subprime mortgages had risen to $1.3 trillion. But mortgage rates were rising. Defaults and foreclosures followed.
The following autumn, the rate of subprime mortgage delinquencies had tripled from the year before. By January 2008, it had quadrupled. And by May it had quintupled.
It was a classic debt deflation. Homeowners had taken on more debt than they could afford. Now, the debt was going bad and investors were getting queasy.
Defaults were bad news for marginal homeowners. They lost their houses. They had to move.
They were bad news to the people who owned the mortgages, too. Wall Street had sliced and diced America’s mortgage deluge and sold it all over the world in the form of mortgage-backed securities – structured products that cleverly concealed, with the tacit backing of the ratings agencies, the junk hidden beneath the surface.
Sellers, too, seemed to forget what was in this sausage; they didn’t realize it was about to make them throw up.
First, Bear Stearns ran from the room, holding its stomach. Then it was Lehman Brothers. At that point, the feds came in with every quack cure they could think of. Bailouts, cash for clunkers, ZIRP, QE – one estimate put the total cost at more than $10 trillion, or about three times the cost of World War II.
The problem with the cures was always a fundamental one. The crisis was caused by too much debt. And all the feds had to offer was… more debt. As Bloomberg reported last week, the world’s stock of toxic sausages has exploded to $100 trillion:
The amount of debt globally has soared more than 40% to $100 trillion since the first signs of the financial crisis, as governments borrowed to pull their economies out of recession and companies took advantage of record low interest rates.
The jump in debt as measured by the Basel, Switzerland-based BIS in its quarterly review is almost twice the US economy.
Stopping the Future
Debt is an obligation laid upon the future by the past. The larger it gets, the harder it is for the future to happen.
There is a correlation between extreme levels of public debt and low economic growth. This has been demonstrated by several studies, most prominently by professors Rogoff and Reinhart. There were some errors in their math, which critics rejoiced in, but the conclusion was solid: High levels of debt-to-GDP have been historically associated with low levels of economic growth.
That is what has been happening in Japan for the last 23 years… and in Europe and the US for the last seven. These economies are still fighting deleveraging, resisting debt deflation and pretending that they can continue to add debt forever… and that somehow this will get them out of their debt traps.
But they are doomed. Without growth they can’t pay the debt. With so much debt, they can’t grow.
Regards,
Bill
These Two “C”s
Will Send Gold Higher
From the desk of Chris Hunter, Editor-in-Chief, Bonner & Partners
Two “C”s threaten widespread market instability: Crimea and China
Let’s look at each one… and why both are bullish for our favorite metal, gold.
Russian forces remain in Crimea, against international law. The government in Kiev is raising a 600,000-strong national guard to buttress its defenses against the Russians. A referendum will be held in Crimea on Sunday to determine whether the autonomous region should become part of Russia. The government in Kiev does not recognize the referendum.
The West is ratcheting up the economic tension. German chancellor Angela Merkel, who is usually relatively quiet on foreign affairs, has warned that Russia faces “massive damage” economically and politically, if it doesn’t back down over Crimea.
Meanwhile, China has gone from being the “engine of global growth” to the locus of concern over a global slowdown.
Chinese exports have collapsed 18% from a year earlier (versus expectations of a 7.5% increase). Chinese GDP growth is slowing. And there are concerns that bond defaults in the Chinese corporate sector may trigger a Chinese credit crunch.
It’s also quickly becoming clear that currency devaluation in Japan to boost exports is a zero-sum game. Japan can steal business from China and Korea, but this just prompts retaliation.
This is the “currency war” scenario many have feared Global QE would trigger. If the US and Japan are devaluing their currencies, it forces competitors to respond in kind… or lose critical export business.
Against this backdrop of uncertainty, it’s no wonder gold has been in rally mode in 2014.
Gold is not just a hedge against fiat currency debasement. It is also “disaster insurance” – a tangible asset with no counterparty risk investors seek out when return of capital, instead of return of capital, becomes a priority.

As you can see from the chart above, the spot gold price just broke above its recent October 2013 high. A break to the upside like this signals higher prices ahead.
Eddy’s Buy List containing 20 stocks contains Blue Chips like McDonalds & Ford Motor Company thru to red hot Tech Stocks like Ebay & Oracle. The list is still up on the year despite a the overall market being down at this time. Eddy’s Buy List is pretty simple, outlining Buy ranges, Current Prices and a description of each Stock. A short and sweet list of Stocks to Buy for the investor interested in adding to his or her portfolio. Editor Money Talks
Crossing Wall St. – Buy List Updates
“Don’t look for the needle in the haystack. Just buy the haystack!” – John C. Bogle
This was a quiet week on Wall Street up until Thursday when renewed worries over Ukraine sent the S&P 500 down 1.2%. The index is once again in the red for the year, however, our trusty Buy List remains in the black.
Despite the dearth of news this week, things will get a lot more interesting next week when the Federal Reserve meets on Tuesday and Wednesday. This will be Janet Yellen’s first meeting as Fed Chair. This will also be her first post-meeting press conference. But the most important news is that there’s a very good chance the Fed will officially drop the Evans Rule.
The Evans Rule, named after Chicago Fed President Charles Evans, states that the Fed won’t raise short-term interest rates until the unemployment rate drops below 6.5%. The problem is that the jobless rate is 6.7% at last count and nearly everyone agrees that the economy is nowhere near ready for higher interest rates. The Evans Rule has been in effect since December 2012, and the Fed has been very careful to say that it’s a threshold and not a trigger.
I first talked about the Fed ditching the Evans Rule in CWS Market Review from January 10. I didn’t think it would happen at the time, but I considered the possibility of it happening later this year. Apparently, later is now.
What does the ditching of the Evans Rule mean for us? It’s very good news for investors. I’ll explain more in a bit, but it’s a clear message from the Fed that they’re going to be on the side of investors. Also in this newsletter, I’ll highlight some of the recent news from our Buy List. Plus, I’ll preview next week’s earnings report from Oracle. Larry Ellison’s firm has turned a corner and I expect more good news. I’ll also talk about the recent earnings warning from Bed Bath & Beyond. But first, let’s look at what’s on the Fed’s mind.
It’s Time to Ditch the Evans Rule
In last week’s CWS Market Review, I talked about the debate on Wall Street regarding how much of the soggy economic news was due to the soggy weather. I explained that most of the incoming data confirmed that the cold weather was in fact keeping shoppers at home.
We recently got two more important pieces of evidence that underscored the bad weather hypotheses. Last Friday, shortly after I sent out last week’s newsletter, the Labor Department reported that the economy created 175,000 new jobs in February, which beat expectations. More importantly, it snapped a two-month streak of pretty bad jobs reports. Bear in mind that the jobs report is by far the most important monthly economic report.
The other encouraging news was that retail sales showed its first increase in three months. Retail sales for February rose by 0.3%, which was 0.1% better than expectations. The numbers for December and January were pretty bad. I should add that Thursday’s initial jobless claims report was especially strong; 315,000 Americans filed first-time unemployment claims. That’s the lowest number since November, and the sixth-lowest in six-and-a-half years.
Last Friday’s jobs report showed us that the pre-weather trend of mediocre jobs growth is still in tact. When the bad data came out, some folks started to wonder if the Fed may have started tapering their bond purchases too early. But most Fed officials stuck to their guns and made it clear that unless something really dramatic happened, they were going to continue paring back their monthly bond purchases.
The plan with Quantitative Easing was that the Fed would purchase each month, $85 billion in bonds. That’s $40 billion in mortgage-backed securities and $45 billion in Treasuries. Twice now, the Fed has lowered the monthly number by $10 billion ($5 billion for each group), and they’re almost certainly going to do it again next week.
Is the Labor Market Really Getting Tight?
There are some concerns that the labor market may be getting “tight” right now, meaning there aren’t enough folks out there to fill up the job needs. As a result, wages are starting to rise. I don’t buy this argument. At least not yet. While it’s true that wage growth is starting to creep up, that’s working off a very low base.
The trouble is that the current labor market is in uncharted territory. The workforce participation rate is near its lowest level in more than 35 years. Many folks have simply walked away from the job market. Some of that is due to demographics, most specifically retiring Baby Boomers, but we don’t know exactly how much.
The unsettling aspect of the current jobs market isn’t the high level of unemployed people, but it may be the high level of unemployable people. I hate to sound so negative, but why would the economy rather pay existing employees higher wages than take on new recruits? Like I said, I’m not on board with the tight labor market idea, but the change in workforce participation has been quite startling.
Here’s the bottom line: The Fed will continue to taper. They seem pretty set on that. The Fed wants to get QE out of the way before they start raising interest rates. Right now, most folks expect the first rate increase will come around the middle of next year. The best early warning sign to watch is rising wages. Of course, that’s good news for workers, but at some point that will turn into higher inflation.
We also want to keep an eye on commodity prices which have risen very sharply in the past few months. Coffee prices, for example, have surge dramatically. For now, your local Starbucks can absorb the blow, but at some point, those commodity prices will take a bit out of consumers’ wallets.
The risk/reward ratio is still very much on the side of stocks. Consider that a Buy List stock such as McDonald’s (MCD) currently yields 3.33%. That’s 68 basis points more than a 10-year Treasury bond. In other words, investors are still vastly over-paying for safety. Until interest rise, the math is clearly on the side of stocks. Now let’s look at some of our Buy List stocks.
Oracle Is a Buy Up to $41 per Share
Oracle (ORCL), the enterprise software king, will report fiscal Q3 earnings next Tuesday, March 18. Three months ago, the company told us to expect Q3 earnings to range between 68 and 72 cents per share. That sounds about right to me. They see revenues rising between 2% and 6%.
I’m pleased to say that reports of Oracle’s demise have been greatly exaggerated. The company is far more “cloudy” than a lot of folks realize. Safra Catz, Oracle’s President and CFO, recently said, “We decided that we were really going to lean in to the cloud to get market share.” That they have.
In December, Oracle reported Q2 earnings of 69 cents per share which was at the top their range. Bookings for Oracle’s cloud enterprise offerings jumped an impressive 35%. The weak spot is new software license subscriptions; revenue there fell by 1%.
I’m in the optimistic camp on Oracle for a few reasons. One is I never go against Larry Ellison. I’ve also been impressed by their headway into the cloud sector. The company has reorganized its sales staff and strategy. I also like how Oracle has been buying back its shares. While I’m not normally a fan of buybacks, Oracle is truly reducing share count and thereby raising EPS.
I’m very curious to see what guidance Oracle offers for Q4, which ends in May. The Street expects 96 cents per share which may be a bit too high. I’ll warn you that the bears love to pounce on ORCL. Either way, Oracle continues to be a very good buy up to $41 per share.
Bed Bath & Beyond Shakes Off the Bad Weather Blues
After the closing bell last Friday, Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) released a statement saying that the lousy weather had zapped six or seven cents per share off their fiscal Q4 earnings. Their fourth quarter ended on March 1, and the earnings report will come out on April 9.
Let’s look at some math. The home furnishings store now says it sees Q4 coming in between $1.57 and $1.61 per share. The previous guidance has been for $1.60 to $1.67 per share. If you recall, the stock gotten beaten up in January when they lowered their initial guidance of $1.70 to $1.77 per share.
Here’s what’s interesting: I was almost convinced that the market was going to punish the shares at Monday’s open. Didn’t happen. Instead, BBBY was one of the top performers on ourBuy List. It looks like the bad-weather message finally got thru to traders.
The company said that during Q4, a store had to be closed for the entire day due to the bad weather 464 times. On top of that, there were 1,923 partial closings. Obviously people can’t shop at closed stores. There may be good news for BBBY in the future. Williams Sonoma, a close competitor, just reported earnings above expectations thanks to new home construction. That could be a lift for the industry. In fact, the entire retail sector has snapped back recently. For now, Bed Bath & Beyond remains a good buy up to $71 per share.
More Buy List Updates
I wanted to add a few quick notes on some of our other Buy List stocks. Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) split 2-for-1 on Monday. The stock has been weak lately after Infosys, a competitor, gave poor guidance. For the most part, CTSH has been executing much better than Infosys so I don’t know if this is such a bad omen. CTSH is a solid buy up to $56 per share.
The Icahn Vs. eBay (EBAY) battle got even louder, if you can imagine that. This week, eBay (are you sitting down?) rejected both of Carl Icahn’s nominees for eBay’s board. eBay said they’re unqualified and urged shareholder to vote against them. This feud is getting tiresome. eBay has made it clear that they’re not going to sell PayPal. Carl, if you’re reading this, move on. eBay continues to be a good buy up to $62 per share.
McDonald’s (MCD) has made an embarrassing amount of errors recently. That’s why the stock has lagged, and partly why I like it. At BusinessWeek, Vanessa Wong takes a look at how MickeyD’s is working to right the ship. McDonald’s is a good buy up to $102 per share.
That’s all for now. In addition to next week’s Fed meeting, the government will release the industrial production report for February on Monday. Then on Tuesday, we’ll get reports on inflation and housing starts. It will be interesting to see if any of the rise in commodities shows up in consumer prices. I suspect that it’s too early. Be sure to keep checking the blog for daily updates. I’ll have more market analysis for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review!
– Eddy
Named by CNN/Money as the best buy-and-hold blogger, Eddy Elfenbein is the editor of Crossing Wall Street. His free Buy List has beaten the S&P 500 for the last seven years in a row. This email was sent by Eddy Elfenbein through Crossing Wall Street.



