“It’s called a “credit cycle” for a reason. Rising rates come around sooner or later – often ferociously – after a long period of apparent stability, over-optimism, overpriced equities and artificially suppressed yields.”

We’ve been meaning to write about what hasn’t happened yet. 

Not that we claim any knowledge of tomorrow or the day after. But we can look at the present. And here’s a guess about where it might lead. 

The middle classes – aka “the voters” – expressed themselves last week. They have been sorely used and they know it. 

The biggest money-fabricating program of all time – the Fed’s QE – has done nothing for them. Instead, it has made their lot worse. 

Investment in new business output has gone down. Their meager savings produce no revenue. And “breadwinning jobs” are scarce. 

For all the talk of an “improving labor market,” there is no sign of it in wages. The typical household has $5,000 less income than it had when the 21st century began.

Cold, Dark and Desperate

Meanwhile, Europe and Japan grow cold, dark and desperate. Last week, ECB chief Mario Draghi announced the central bank would buy another €1 trillion of bonds to try to light a fire under the euro-zone economy. 

And Bank of Japan governor Haruhiko Kuroda got out his matches the week before, claiming potentially unlimited tinder. 

Can the US resist the worldwide slump? 

Our view is it’s just a matter of time before either the US economy or US stock market begins to wobble. 

We could see the Dow fall 1,000 points or more… or we could hear GDP growth has gone negative… or both. 

Then what? 

It’s a good bet that the Yellen Fed would intervene again – hoping to keep a small problem from becoming a bigger one. 

Ever since the 1930s, central bankers have learned that they will scarcely ever be criticized for overreacting. But if they sit on their hands, they will be damned to hell. 

And ever since Alan Greenspan’s 1987 “put,” the Fed has backed up the stock market with whatever policy it deemed appropriate. 

Lower rates? QE? It’ll do “whatever it takes.” 

Janet Yellen is aware that the two previous Fed chairmen were hailed for having saved the economy from destruction. She won’t want to be the first to let it fail. 

While we are guessing, we’ll suppose each rescue effort will be more costly and less effective than the one that preceded it. 

That’s the way “stimulus” works. Like looking at naughty pictures, the first are exciting and titillating. Later, they are just boring and sordid. 

Still, a vigorous new response from the Fed would probably produce another rise in financial asset prices. But then what?

Coaxing Stocks Higher

Central bank activism – stimulating credit creation with artificially low interest rates – only works when people see little risk of default or rising rates. But that risk cannot be ignored forever. 

It’s called a “credit cycle” for a reason. Rising rates come around sooner or later – often ferociously – after a long period of apparent stability, over-optimism, overpriced equities and artificially suppressed yields. 

When that happens, the central banks lose their ability to coax stocks higher with lower rates. 

The Fed has been interfering with the credit cycle for the last 20 years. But when it believes it can overturn the cycle for good… that is when it becomes a big loser. 

At that point, and it could be months – or years – ahead, we are likely to see central banks become more creative. 

What else can they do? 

They will still be fully committed to “saving” the economy. When their policy tools fail, they will have to come up with something different. 

What? We see three things: 

1) Central banks will buy stocks. Japan, as usual, is ahead of the curve. 

2) Governments will bring out large fiscal stimulus packages aimed at infrastructure “investments” that are supposed to pay for themselves. 

3) Some form of Direct Monetary Funding from central banks will finance these stimulus packages. Central banks will simply “print” the needed funds. 

All of these measures are either already in service or much discussed in the leading financial journals. 

What will they mean to stocks? Bonds? The dollar? 

Stay tuned… 

Regards,

Bill Bonner

Whatever about the future effects of monetary stimulus, it cannot be said that past efforts have been good for inflation-sensitive commodities. 

In fact, the opposite is true. 

As Bill alludes to, commodities are plunging as the exchange value of the dollar rises versus foreign currencies. 

As you can see below, the iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) – which tracks a broad basket of commonly traded commodities – is down 32% from its 2011 peak. And it recently took out the low it set in June 2012. 

This decline happened under the Fed’s QE.

And gold – the finite yardstick against which infinite currencies are supposed to be measured – has also come under huge selling pressure.

The chart below, going back two years, shows that not only has gold been in a downtrend, but also it has taken out its June and December 2013 lows at around $1,200 an ounce.

Again, most of this decline happened under the Fed’s QE. 

This does not mean you should rush out and sell your gold. Gold is not a speculation. It is an insurance policy against monetary disaster. And if Bill’s thesis is right, owning some gold is prudent. 

But judging from the charts above, there could be a lot more price falls to come before that policy pays out.