In this issue:
Killing the Goose
What Were We Thinking?
Let’s Play Turn It Around
Detroit, the Red Sox and the Yankees, and Traveling Too Much

Peggy Noonan, maybe the most gifted essayist of our time, wrote a few weeks ago about the vague concern that many of us have that the monster looming up ahead of us has the potential (my interpretation) for not just plucking a few feathers from the goose that lays the golden egg (the US free-market economy), or stealing a few more of the valuable eggs, but of actually killing the goose. Today we look at the possibility that the fiscal path of the enormous US government deficits we are on could indeed kill the goose, or harm it so badly it will make the lost decades that Japan has suffered seem like a stroll in the park.

And while I do not think we will get to that point (though I can’t deny the possibility), for reasons I will go into, there is the very real prospect that the upheavals created by not dealing proactively with the problems (or denying they exist) will be as bad as or worse than the credit crisis we have gone through. This is not going to be something that happens overnight, and the seeming return to normalcy that so many predict has the rather alarming aspect of creating a sense of complacency that will only serve to “kick the can” down the road.

This week we look at the problem, and then muse upon what the more likely scenarios are that may play out. This is a longer version of a speech I gave this morning to the New Orleans Conference, where I also offered a path out of the problems. This letter will be a little more controversial than normal, but I hope it makes us all think about the very serious plight we have put ourselves in.

Let’s review a few paragraphs I wrote last month: “I have seven kids. As our family grew, we limited the choices our kids could make; but as they grew into teenagers, they were given more leeway. Not all of their choices were good. How many times did Dad say, ‘What were you thinking?’ and get a mute reply or a mumbled ‘I don’t know.’

“Yet how else do you teach them that bad choices have bad consequences? You can lecture, you can be a role model; but in the end you have to let them make their own choices. And a lot of them make a lot of bad choices. After having raised six, with one more teenage son at home, I have come to the conclusion that you just breathe a sigh of relief if they grow up and have avoided fatal, life-altering choices. I am lucky. So far. Knock on a lot of wood.

“I have watched good kids from good families make bad choices, and kids with no seeming chance make good choices. But one thing I have observed. Very few teenagers make the hard choice without some outside encouragement or help in understanding the known consequences, from some source. They nearly always opt for the choice that involves the most fun and/or the least immediate pain, and then learn later that they now have to make yet another choice as a consequence of the original one. And thus they grow up. So quickly.”

What Were We Thinking?

As a culture, the current mix of generations, especially in the US, has made some choices. Choices which, in hindsight, leave the adult in us asking, “What were we thinking?”

We made a series of bad choices and suffered the credit crisis because of it. Now, as a nation, we are in the middle of making an even worse choice, one that will leave us with no good choices – only choices of pretty bad to awful. Let’s begin with a quote from a recent client letter by my friends at Hayman Advisors (in Dallas).

“Western democracies, communistic capitalists, and Japanese deflationists are concurrently engaging in what may be the largest, global financial experiment in history. Everywhere you turn, governments are running enormous fiscal deficits financed by printing money. The greatest risk of these policies is that the quantitative easing will persist until the value of the currency equals the actual cost of printing the currency (which is just slightly above zero).

“There have been 28 episodes of hyperinflation of national economies in the 20th century, with 20 occurring after 1980. Peter Bernholz (Professor Emeritus of Economics in the Center for Economics and Business (WWZ) at the University of Basel, Switzerland) has spent his career examining the intertwined worlds of politics and economics with special attention given to money. In his most recent book, Monetary Regimes and Inflation: History, Economic and Political Relationships, Bernholz analyzes the 12 largest episodes of hyperinflations – all of which were caused by financing huge public budget deficits through money creation. His conclusion: the tipping point for hyperinflation occurs when the government’s deficit exceed 40% of its expenditures.

“According to the current Office of Management and Budget (OMB) projections, US federal expenditures are projected to be $3.653 trillion in FY 2009 and $3.766 trillion in FY 2010, with unified deficits of $1.580 trillion and $1.502 trillion, respectively. These projections imply that the US will run deficits equal to 43.3% and 39.9% of expenditures in 2009 and 2010, respectively. To put it simply, roughly 40% of what our government is spending has to be borrowed. [Emphasis mine]

“One has to ask whether the US reached the critical tipping point. Beyond the quantitative measurements associated with government deficits and money creation, there exists a qualitative aspect to such a scenario that may be far more important. The qualitative perceptions of fiscal and monetary policies are impossible to control once confidence is lost. In fact, recent price action in metals, the dollar and commodities suggests that the market is already anticipating the future.”

Let me point out that the deficits for 2010 assume a rather robust recovery, and so they could turn out to be much worse, especially if unemployment continues to rise and Congress decides (rightly) to extend unemployment benefits.

The interest on the national debt in fiscal 2008 was $451 billion. Even though the debt has exploded, the interest for fiscal 2009 is down to “only” $383 billion. My back-of-the-napkin estimate says that is over 20% of total 2009 tax receipts. I guess when you take interest rates to zero and really load up on short-term debt, it helps lower interest costs. (More on that future problem later.) http://www.savingsbonds.gov/govt/reports/ir/ir_expense.htm

The fiscal deficits are projected to be about 11% of nominal GDP, which is now roughly $14.3 trillion. The Congressional Budget Office currently projects that deficits will still be $1 trillion in ten years.

Last spring I published as an Outside the Box a very important paper by Dr. Woody Brock on why you cannot grow government debt well above nominal GDP without causing severe disruptions to the overall economic system. If you have not read it, or would like to read it again, click here.

I am going to reproduce just one table from that piece. Note that this was Woody’s worst-case assumption, adding 8% of GDP to the debt each year, and not the 11% we are experiencing today. The Congressional Budget Office projections are now even worse, and that assumes a very rosy 3% or more growth in the economy for the next five years. Under Woody’s scenario, the national debt would rise to $18 trillion by 2015, or well over 100% of GDP, depending on your growth assumptions. Take some time to study the tables, but I am going to focus on 2015 and not the outlier years.

$1.5 trillion dollars means that someone has to invest that much in Treasury bonds. Let’s look at where the $1.5 trillion might come from. Let’s assume that all of our trade deficit comes back to the US and is invested in US government bonds. Today we found out that the latest monthly trade deficit was just over $30 billion, or $370 billion annualized (which is half what it was a few years ago). That still leaves $1.13 trillion that needs to be found to be invested in US government debt (forget about business and consumer loans and mortgages).

Killing the Goose

$1.13 trillion is roughly 8% of total US GDP. That is a staggering amount. And again, that assumes that foreigners continue to put 100% of their fresh reserves into dollar-denominated assets. That is not a safe assumption, given the recent news stories about how governments are thinking about whether to create an alternative to the dollar as a reserve currency. (And if I was watching the US run $1.5 trillion deficits with no realistic plans to cut back, I would be having private talks too. They would be idiots not to do so.)

There are only three sources for the needed funds: either an increase in taxes or people increasing savings and putting them into government bonds or the Fed monetizing the debt, or some combination of all three.

Now the Fed is in fact monetizing a portion of the debt as part of its quantitative easing program, and US consumers are saving more. Tax receipts are way down. I can tell you there is a great deal of angst in New Orleans tonight about the Fed monetization. This is traditionally a “gold bug” conference, and many of the participants and speakers see only inflation in our future.

Long-time readers know that I think the Fed has been able to get away with its rather large monetization program because of the massive deflationary forces let loose in the world by the credit crisis, which is forcing a monster deleveraging regime all over the world. Where has all the money gone that the Fed has printed? Right back onto the Fed’s balance sheet as bank reserves. The banks are not lending, so this money does not get into the system in the usual manner associated with fractional reserve banking. Until that happens, and is accompanied by increasing wages and employment, inflation is not in our immediate future.

And this brings us to our conundrum. You cannot continue to run deficits significantly larger than nominal GDP for too long without risking the demise of the economic system. Ask Argentina or any of the other nations where hyperinflation occurred, as detailed in the study mentioned above. But we are in a deflationary environment, so the Fed can monetize the debt far more than any of us suppose without risking immediate and spiraling inflation.

But there is a limit to the Fed’s ability to do so without causing real inflation. First, as long as the Fed is independent, at some point they will simply have to tell Congress we can no longer monetize the debt. While I am sure that some of you doubt they would do so, the Fed officials and economists I have been around are pretty adamant about that. There is a line they will not be pushed past. It may be further than I like, but it is there.

The Fed cannot simply buy up all the debt needed to fund the government. Again, no one on the FOMC would either advocate or allow that. That would in fact start us down a very dangerous path rather quickly. Therefore, they must have a large number of willing bond buyers outside the Fed. The good news, gentle reader, is that we will find someone to buy that debt. That is also the bad news. Let’s go back 30 years.

Legend now has it that Paul Volker single-handedly took the inflation bull by the horns and ripped them off. Now, it took fortitude to do that in the face of certain recession and high unemployment. Those were not fun days. But his partner in the deed was the bond market. Bond investors simply demanded higher returns, because they were really worried about inflation.

At some point, if we do not get the government deficit under control, the bond market is once again going to react. Seemingly overnight, real (inflation-adjusted) rates are going to rise, and will do so rapidly. And I am not talking about 1 or 2%. You just cannot have 8% of a $14-trillion GDP go into US government debt every year, forever, at today’s low real rates.

Let’s play a thought game. If you take 8% of US consumer spending and save it, and it finds its way into government bonds, you have reduced consumer spending and therefore the actual GDP. But how about those who want to invest in stocks? Foreign bonds and currencies? New businesses? Loans of all types? How much are we going to have to save to get the necessary capital? How high will the saving rate have to be to finance all those other activities in a world where debt securitization is still anemic?

Some will point to Japan and their government debt-to-GDP ratio, which will soon be over 200%, a far cry from where we are today. Why can’t we grow our debt to 200%? Because the Japanese have long had a culture of saving and investing in government bonds. It’s what you do to support the country. But even they will run into a wall as their savings rate continues to drop, because so many of their citizens are retired and are now selling bonds to finance retirement. They too are running massive fiscal deficits, on the order of the size of the US deficits. And does anyone really want to have two lost decades, like Japan?

How long can we go before there is an upheaval? I don’t know. The markets can remain irrational or complacent for a lot longer than most of us think. It could be years. Or not. Suddenly, it will be July 2008 and the bond vigilantes stampede.

But now, we seemingly can borrow with no consequences. The deflation that is in the air, plus the lack of bank lending holds, down the normal inflation impulses. We as a nation are leveraging ourselves up. We’re partying like it’s still 2005. The music is playing and we are dancing. Our Congress is trying to figure out how to run even higher deficits.

At some point, the consequences will be significant. There are two paths, and it is not clear which one we will take. First, we might see inflation kick in and actual rates rise. Since so much of our national debt is short-term debt, that means yet another rise in the deficit as rates rise. Mortgage rates rise, putting pressure on the housing market. There will be even more pressure on commercial mortgages. Consumer debt will be harder to get and cost more. It will mean funding costs for businesses will rise, and that hurts employment. It would be a return to the 1970s of high interest rates and stagnant growth in a very slow-growth environment.

Second, we could see deflation kick in and, even though rates stay more or less where they are, real (after-deflation) rates could rise as they did in the ’30s and in Japan.

Some of my most knowledgeable friends argue for the inflation side, and others take the deflation side. I tend to think the Fed will fight deflation until we get inflation, but the consequences will not be pleasant. There is no benign path.

How can we avoid such an upheaval? The only way is to make some very difficult choices. There have to be some adults making the choices, as the teenagers now in control clearly cannot make them.

As I have written in the past, we can run deficits of 2% of GDP for a very long time, which in a few years would be about $300 billion. It is my belief that if the bond market and world investors saw a credible plan to put us on a path to a deficit no larger than 2% of GDP, the dire upheaval that is in our future could be avoided.

But that will mean some painful choices. It is not a matter of pain or no pain, it is just deciding when and how bad it will be. The longer we wait, the worse the consequences.

Let’s Play Turn It Around

There are businessmen who are called turnaround specialists. They come into companies that are sick but have a basic competency, and that with the right management can be made into viable concerns. Generally, the choices the new management makes are painful to those involved, but they are necessary if the enterprise is to remain a going concern.

So, for the next few pages, I am going to suggest some things we can do to turn the US around. They are not easy fixes, and I know a lot of readers will not like what they read or will disagree on points. But something like this is going to have to be done, or we risk killing the goose.

First, we must acknowledge the deficit is out of control, and spending must be cut. If we raise taxes by as much as the Obama administration now wants to, we will most assuredly put the country back into a deep recession in 2011. Think what raising taxes in 1937 did to a nascent recovery. A $3-trillion-dollar budget is 20% of the US economy. That is just simply too much.

Quick fact. The most credible studies show that government expenditures exert no multiplier effect on the economy. Actually, they show them to be very slightly negative. This is not just in the US. However, the tax effect has a multiplier of 3! If we raise taxes by $300 billion in 2011, that will slam the economy in the face. Further, we will collect less taxes than projected, as economic activity will fall.

You cannot cure a too much debt problem with more debt. We cannot borrow our way into prosperity. Every crisis of the past decades has been a result of too much debt and leverage and we seem to want to repeat the past mistakes, hoping that this time it will be different. It won’t.

Ok, now let’s play the Turnaround Hammer Game.

+ We should start with a 5% acrossthe-board cut in spending in all programs. Federal employees, except for military personnel, should see a 5% cut in pay as part of that program. The average federal worker makes $75,419 a year, while the average in the private sector is $39,751. The rest of us are taking pay cuts in the form of higher taxes. No cost of living increases, etc. We are on an austerity program and need to do what it takes. If a program is deemed too important to be cut, then another program has to be cut more.

Then the next year another 2.5% cut across the board. And then an absolute freeze on the overall budget size until the deficit is 2% or less of GDP.

+ Social Security must be fixed now. We all know that it is going to have to be done, so why not just do it? Means testing should be a part of the mix. As an idea, for every $10,000 in income a retiree has, he gets $1,000 less in SS payments. And increase the retirement age down the road. When SS was launched, retirement age was 65. But the average life span was 65. There are other things we can do, but whatever our poison of choice is, we need to take it.

+ Medicare must be revised, with real health-care reform. The national debt is $56 trillion if we count unfunded liabilities, much of which is Medicare. It will become a nightmare around the middle of the next decade. Adding more expenses now without cutting elsewhere makes no sense. If we kill the goose, no one will get anything excect very empty promises.

Side note: there actually is a lot of waste in the system. Software should be written that analyzes every patient and procedure and produces an outcomes-based analysis of what is reasonable, rather than throwing every test at every patient. And the government should make sure, even if it has to spend the money, that the updated system is in place in every hospital and clinic in the country. And doctors should be given access to it so they can decide what type of care is appropriate to prescribe. And health-care reform means tort reform.

Today, I got a note from a friend of mine who just had yet another heart attack. It seems his stent is now blocked by 50%. He is a vet, and his primary care is the Veterans Administration. The Veterans Hospital system will not do a procedure to unblock the stent until it is 70% blocked. He does not have any money, so he is simply waiting to have another heart attack. I am really looking forward to government-run health care.

+ Each year we allow almost 1 million immigrants into the US, mostly family of people already here. I suggest that for the next two years we stop that. Instead, let anyone who can buy a home, passes basic screening, and can demonstrate the ability to pay for health insurance immigrate to the US and get a temporary green card. If they behave, then the card becomes permanent after four years.

We almost immediately put a floor on the housing market, absorb the excess homes, and within a year the housing-construction market, along with the jobs that are now gone, will be back. That is stimulus that costs the taxpayers nothing.

+ While I can’t believe I am writing this, taxes are going to have to rise, if for no other reason than this Congress is hell bent on raising taxes. But rescinding the entire Bush tax cuts, plus adding a 10% surcharge as Congress wants to do in one fell swoop, is an absolute guarantee of a recession. So do it gradually over (say) 4 years, and then reinstitute the cuts when the deficit is under 2% of GDP. Remember the negative tax-multiplier effect of raising taxes. And the definitive work on that was done by Obama’s chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, Christina Romer.

We should consider a VAT tax and a major cut/reorganization of the corporate tax. We need to encourage corporations to hire more, and you do that by taxing less. Let’s make our corporations more competitive, not less. Our taxes are much higher than those of any of our major competitors. And please forget that insane carbon tax. If you want to cut emissions, do it straightforwardly by raising taxes significantly on gasoline. Don’t back-door it on consumers. (And I am NOT advocating such a policy.)

+ An aggressive tax benefit for new venture-capital money that is invested in new technologies will result in new industries. The only way we can grow our way out of this mess is to create whole new industries, like we did in the late ’70s and ’80s. (Think computers and the internet and telecom.)

+ Unemployment is likely to continue to rise and last longer than ever before. We have to take care of the basic needs of those who want work but can’t find it. Unemployment insurance should be extended to those who are still looking for work past the time for benefits to expire, and some program of local volunteer service should be instituted as the price for getting continued benefits after the primary benefits time period runs out. Not only will this help the community, but it will get the person out into the world where he is more likely to meet someone who can give him a job. But the costs of this program should be revenue-neutral. Something else has to be cut.

+ We have to re-hink our military costs (I can’t believe I am writing this!). We now spend almost 50% of the world’s total military budget. Maybe we need to understand that we can’t fight two wars and support hundreds of bases around the world. If we kill the goose, our ability to fight even one medium-sized war will be diminished. The harsh reality is that everything has to be re-evaluated. As an example, do we really need to be in Korea? If so, why can’t Korea pay for much of the cost? They are now a rich nation. There are budgetary fiscal limits to being the policeman for the world.

+ Glass-Steagall, or some form of it, should be brought back. Banks, which are subject to taxpayer bailouts, should not be in the investment banking and derivatives-creating business. Derivatives, especially credit default swaps, should be on an exchange, and too big to fail must go. Banks have enough risk just making loans. Leverage should be dialed down, and hedge funds selling what amounts to naked call options in any form, derivative or otherwise, should be regulated.

Let me see, is there any group I have not offended yet? But something like I am suggesting is going to have to be done at some point. There is no way we can continue forever on the current path. At some point, we will hit the wall. The fight between the bug and the windshield always ends in favor of the windshield. The bond market is going to have to see a credible effort to get back to a reasonable deficit, or we risk a very difficult economic environment. The longer we wait, the worse it will be.

It is not going to be easy to persuade a majority of Americans that we need to do something now. More realistically, we are going to probably have to begin to experience a crisis of some type to get politicians motivated to do something.

This last Tuesday, I spoke to the Financial Leadership Association at the University of Texas at Dallas. It was mostly undergraduates, and my assigned topic was how financial research impacts our investment decisions. In touched on the topic above, in less detail, but pointing out that at some point we are going to have to bring the deficit under reasonable control. I got some push-back, as some could not understand why we just couldn’t keep running deficits, as we simply owe it to ourselves. I tried to explain, but for a few of them I was not getting through (though I think most got it). And these were the finance students! I shudder to think what the sociology department would be like.

We are not going back to normal, although it is likely we will see some form of Statistical Recovery. But we cannot get complacent. Somewhere out there is the real potential for another crisis, which will dwarf the last one. You will not want to be long much of anything when it happens, except hedged or liquid investments. Though admittedly, this could go on for a long time. I just don’t know how long “long” is. Other than it will be too long and then not long enough.

Detroit, the Red Sox and the Yankees and Traveling Too Much

I leave for Detroit next Friday and speak at a private conference on Saturday, then rush to the airport to fly to New York. My friend Barry Habib has second-row behind-home-plate tickets to what we hope is a Yankees – Boston Red Sox playoff championship game. That would have to be one of the most exciting games to watch – the emotions will run as high as in any sporting event around. So I find myself in the strange position of cheering on both the Yankees and the Red Sox in the first round of playoffs, and hoping that there is not a four-game sweep in the second.

Dinner with the guys at Yahoo Tech Ticker on Monday, and then an early train to Philadelphia, where I will speak at a conference hosted by my friends and partners at CMG. Dinner that night, a very early flight to Dallas, change airports, fly to Houston to speak at Salient Partners, then a late-night flight back to Dallas, up early to fly to Orlando to be with Jon Sundt of Altegris at the Commonwealth conference, fly back early (sigh) Saturday morning to Dallas, drive home, pack, and take an overnight flight to Buenos Aires to start a speaking tour with new Latin American partner Enrique Fynn, then on to Montevideo, Uruguay, Sao Paulo. and Rio de Janeiro, and then back to Montevideo for a day of R&R. Then back home Monday. I am already tired.

Tomorrow I get to hear Karl Rove (wonder if he will remember me from our Texas days?), Howard Dean, Charles Krauthammer, and a lot of friends, then a series of parties tomorrow night. I always enjoy coming to The Big Easy for this conference. (Note to Chinese and Spanish translators: the Big Easy is a nickname for New Orleans. I can’t expect them to know that one.)

It is time to hit the send button, as I have to speak at my next session. You have a great week, and remember that together we will get through all the coming problems. Just keep paying attention.

Your worried about all the unintended consequences analyst,

John Mauldin
John@FrontLineThoughts.com

 

 

John Mauldin, Best-Selling author and recognized financial expert, is also editor of the free Thoughts From the Frontline that goes to over 1 million readers each week. For more information on John or his FREE weekly economic letter go to: http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/learnmore

To subscribe to John Mauldin’s E-Letter please click here:
http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/subscribe.asp

To change your email address please click here:
http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/change.asp

If you would ALSO like changes applied to the Accredited Investor E- Letter, please include your old and new email address along with a note requesting the change for both e-letters and send your request to wave@frontlinethoughts.com

To unsubscribe please refer to the bottom of the email.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS, INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS, YOU SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS: OFTEN ENGAGE IN LEVERAGING AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES THAT MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS, CAN BE ILLIQUID, ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERIODIC PRICING OR VALUATION INFORMATION TO INVESTORS, MAY INVOLVE COMPLEX TAX STRUCTURES AND DELAYS IN DISTRIBUTING IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.

John Mauldin is the President of Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA) which is an investment advisory firm registered with multiple states. John Mauldin is a registered representative of Millennium Wave Securities, LLC, (MWS) an NASD registered broker-dealer. MWS is also a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) registered with the CFTC, as well as an Introducing Broker (IB). Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of MWA LLC and MWS LLC. All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Investment recommendations may change and readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before making any investment decisions.

Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. John Mauldin and/or the staffs at Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC may or may not have investments in any funds cited above. John Mauldin can be reached at 800-829-7273.

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here:
http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/unsubscribe.asp
Or send an email To: wave@frontlinethoughts.com
This email was sent to ZurrerMoneytalks@shaw.ca

A brief excerpt of the lengthy daily internet comment by Richard Russell of Dow theory Letters. One of the best values anywhere in the financial world at only a $300 subscription to get his report daily for a year. HERE to subscribe.

Aside from the Chinese and Indians, the world’s population owns no gold. Ask any American whether he owns gold. Ask any fund manager whether he has gold in his fund. As the planet’s realizes to its horror that all fiat currency is “worthless” fantasy currency, I believe that there will be a world panic to buy gold. This will set off one of the wildest and most explosive bull markets in history.

Meanwhile, the “secondary” monetary metal is silver (often called “the poor man’s gold”). Silver is far too cheap compared with its historic ratio to gold, which has been as low at 15 to 1. An ounce of gold now buys 59 ounces of silver. The chart below shows the silver bull market on its climb from just over 8 dollars an ounce in late-2008 to 17.76 an ounce this morning.

 

Nichols gets even more bullish on gold

With continuing stress in western economies, particularly in the U.S, changing attitudes towards gold from Central Banks, the desire to diversify reserve holdings by some major economies and the growth in ETFs, the outlook for the gold price is strong.
by Lawrence Williams

LONDON – U.S. gold economist, Jeffrey Nichols, seems more bullish than ever on the prospects for substantial upwards movement in the price of gold over the next few years considering the latest development in the markets, perhaps even more so than in his previous analyses. While Nichols has tended to be a gold bull in the past he has also been one of the more sober commentators amongst this genre so his developing views do require some attention.

He feels the root causes of the current economic crisis – and his now extremely bullish views on gold – have been decades of easy money, low interest rates, and a persistently expansionary monetary and fiscal policy by the United States. As he put it in a speech to the Latin Exploration 2009 Conference in Buenos Aires last week, “As a result, Americans have been on a buying binge in the global marketplace, buying things we often don’t really need with money we don’t really have. And the rest of the world – especially China and the other Asian economic powerhouses – have been co-conspirators, lending us the money to satisfy our need for more things in order to promote economic growth and high employment in their own economies.”

He likens the situation to a massive Ponzi scheme on a scale never before seen. “Beginning late in President Reagan’s second term with the appointment of Alan Greenspan as Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve and continuing with Ben Bernanke at the helm of America’s central bank, the Fed has pursued an expansionary, low interest-rate policy that has placed growth above all else” reckons Nichols. “During these years, every economic or financial-market crisis was met with injections of liquidity into the banks and financial markets with interest rate cuts often to negative inflation-adjusted rates of return.

“The stock market crash of 1987, the Gulf War beginning in 1990, the Mexican Peso Crisis in 1994, the Asian Currency Crisis in 1997, the Long-Term Capital Management bankruptcy in 1998, the Internet Dot-Com Bubble in 2000, and the U.S. Housing Bubble that ended in 2007:

“Each crisis was met with more money and lower interest rates – a policy that came to be known as the Greenspan Put and more recently the Bernanke Put because it assured many of the most reckless risk-takers they would not lose a red cent.

“We never would have had the last stock market boom carry valuations to such heights without easy money. We never would have had the U.S. housing boom without artificially low interest rates and without Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac promoting home ownership for everyone, whether or not they could really afford it.

“We never would have had the mortgage-backed securities debacle without easy money and low interest rates. And, no one – especially foreign central banks – would have bought these and other sub-prime securities if they thought they could lose their shirts.

“Rather than allowing periodic recessions and bear markets to purge the excesses of each prior boom or bubble, the Fed stimulated the economy with massive doses of new credit, more injections of liquidity, and lower interest rates. Neither the Fed nor the politicians in Washington wanted a recession – and hardly anyone complained when the Fed just printed more money.” says Nichols.

Like all ‘Ponzi Schemes’, investors lose out at the end, although those in and out again in the early stages can make massive gains.

As to the current ‘economic recovery’, Nichols, like a number of other economic observers is skeptical to say the least. “Although many are beginning to talk about economic recovery in the United States, those that are seeing “green shoots” are looking through “rose-colored” eyeglasses” says Nichols ” . . . and there is significant risk of a “double-dip recession with further contraction and a second down-leg yet to come. The economy is showing signs of life only because of massive injections of liquidity by the Fed and the various bailouts by the Treasury.”

“We have never” says Nichols “in the economic history of the United States seen a period of rapid growth in money and credit nor an extended period of negative real interest rates that has not been followed by a declining dollar exchange rate and a rising inflation rate at home.”

Nichols also notes as bullish for the gold price a changing attitude towards gold by Central Banks, with even those which have been among the sellers now seemingly reluctant to sell any more, while countries like China and Russia are now increasing their portions of reserves held in gold – and still have a huge way to go to get anywhere near the percentages held by most western Central Banks.

Indeed those Central Banks which did sell large percentages of their gold holdings are looking pretty foolish – perhaps most of all the U.K. which sold half its reserves under the guidance of current Prime Minister, Gordon Brown (who has since managed to spin his way to a reputation for financial prudence), at the nadir of the price – now known by U.K. economists as ‘Browns Bottom’.

There certainly seems to be a trend towards increased diversification of reserve assets away from what is seen as a dollar in decline, with gold probably being a major beneficiary.

The performance of the scrap market in this latest run-up to $1,000 is also cause for positive thinking among the bulls with the responsiveness of the scrap market being much more subdued than the last time gold moved above this level.

Gold mine production is also seen as continuing to decline having seemingly peaked and with the main areas of production growth in countries like China and Russia which may well be buying up all their domestic production anyway, new supply to the market may be limited.

Another factor noted by Nichols is the introduction and growing popularity of gold exchange-traded funds which have changed the market in a very important way that is not yet well appreciated by many analysts and observers of the gold scene. By facilitating gold investment and ownership ETFs have brought significant numbers of new participants to the market – not just individuals but hedge funds, pensions, and other institutional investors.

Nichols concludes that thanks to extremely expansionary monetary policy – and with a little help from ETF investors, central banks, and new or evolving markets – like China and India – the gold price will continue to move ahead. He reckons $2,000 to $3,000 is on the cards in the next few years.

 

The 84 yr. old writes a market comment daily since the internet age began.  In recent years, he began strongly advocated buying gold coins in the late 1990’s below $300. His position before the recent crash was cash and gold.

There is little in markets he has not seen.  Mr. Russell gained wide recognition via a series of over 30 Dow Theory and technical articles that he wrote for Barron’s during the late-’50s through the ’90s. Russell was the first (in 1960) to recommend gold stocks. He called the top of the 1949-’66 bull market. And almost to the day he called the bottom of the great 1972-’74 bear market, and the beginning of the great bull market which started in December 1974. He loaded up on bonds in the early 80’s when US Treasuries where yielding 18%.

 

 

Today’s chart presents the performance of the Dow for the calendar year following the 15 worst calendar year performances of the Dow since 1896. For example, the worst calendar year performance on record for the Dow occurred in 1931. During the following calendar year (1932), the Dow was down 23%. The second worst calendar year performance for the Dow occurred in 1907. During the following calendar year (1908), the Dow was up 46%. That brings us to the present. The Dow’s performance during the 2008 calendar year proved to be the third worst on record. So far in 2009, the Dow is up over 11%. Today’s chart illustrates that with the exception of the early 1930s, the Dow has tended to rally following an extremely poor performance during the year prior.

 

….sign up for the FREE Chart o fthe Day HERE.

“Amazing, no mention of the new highs in gold except on the front page of today’s Financial Times. Is this a conspiracy of silence? Actually, the less said, the better. There’s nothing more powerful than a “silent and ignored bull market! – Richard Russell 10/07/09

 

Gold Soars To Another All-Time High!

Good day… And a Thunderin’ Thursday to you! It’s raining here in St. Louis, so, it must be Thursday! It’s a big night for yours truly, but I’ll talk about that at the end… We’ve got some big moves going on in the currencies and metals, so we had better get to it, and save the chit-chat for later, eh? But first, today is the funding deadline on our latest BRIC MarketSafe CD… We’ll have one more in November and then that’s it!

OK, front and center this morning, Gold has soared to another all-time high! When I turned on the screen this morning, Gold was flashing a great big $1,055 figure… WOW! But wait! OK, now that sounded like an infomercial… But wait! If you act now, you can get double the Ginsu knives! HA! OK, getting back to the original, but wait… Gold and Silver for that matter, aren’t the only risk assets moving higher this morning… All 16 of the countries that are deemed to be the biggest U.S. trading partners, have currencies that are taking liberties VS the dollar this morning…

Basically, it’s like this folks… We keep seeing signs that a global recovery is taking place, I mean, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) even hiked rates this week for crying out loud! And… With those signs of recovery, come the feelings that global rates will be rising, as witnessed by the RBA this week, and with global rates rising, the yield differential to the dollar becomes even greater in favor of the non-dollar currencies.

This is quite evident, when you look out on the currency landscape and see that Aussie dollars (A$) are trading with a 90-cent handle… Brazilian reals are trading 36% higher VS the dollar since March 1st!

Why did I highlight those two currencies? Well, as has been well documented, the RBA already hiked rates and increased their rate differential to the dollar this week, with the thought that they would come back again in November for another rate hike… And Brazil? Yesterday, I saw a story flash across the screen that the Brazilian Central Bank Gov. is mentioning at least 200 BPS of rate hikes before he leaves office next year! Talk about increasing the rate / yield differential!

Yesterday, I talked to you about the euro, and explained why it had not participated with the other currencies’ assault on the dollar… Well, the Big Dog /euro got off the porch to stretch its legs and chase the dollar down the street a bit last night… The euro is trading with an eye toward 1.48…

Well, keeping with the theme that a global recovery is taking place, German Industrial Production rose in August 1.7% from a decline in July. As reported here about a month ago, Germany exited their recession in the 2nd QTR, posting a positive, albeit negligible, GDP… I expect their 3rd QTR to be a bit stronger, as they build on this nascent recovery.

The European Central Bank (ECB) meets this morning, in fact, they’re meeting as I write… I don’t expect the ECB to move rates, announce any quantitative easing, or anything like that… What I’m half expecting though is for ECB President, Trichet, to attempt to put a tourniquet around the dollar, to stop the bleeding… Hey! Nobody in the U.S. is fighting to keep the dollar strong, so somebody has to!

OK… I’ve explained this many times before, but for the new readers, it’s really something that needs to be understood… Look, the ECB and Trichet, know all too well that the U.S. has painted itself into a corner, and the dollar is getting punished for their actions… And, they understand that all they would have to do is talk glowingly about the euro and it would deep six the dollar in a heartbeat! But what good would that do? It’s far better to just keep the lips zipped shut, and watch a general, slow, depreciation of the dollar… So… The euro’s run to the high 1.47 handle this morning, could be at risk to what Trichet has to say… But remember folks, he’s just wrapping a tourniquet around the dollar, it’s not like he’s in love with the dollar and the fundamentals behind it!

Last night, I was doing some reading / research and came across a story that really piqued my interest… Here’s a snippet from the Bloomberg…

“Central banks are diversifying away from the dollar “more aggressively,” according to Barclays Plc, the world’s third-largest currency trader.

The dollar accounted for 37 percent of the $115 billion foreign reserves central banks amassed in the second quarter, after adjustment for exchange-rate changes during the period, compared with 52 percent in the euro, according to a Barclays analysis of data that the International Monetary Fund released on Sept. 30. That was the first time that the dollar’s share fell below 40 percent in the new accumulated foreign reserves of $100 billion or more since the euro’s 1999 debut.”

Remember, about a week or so ago, when I told you that the IMF’s currency report basically showed a move away from the dollar too…

HEY! IF CENTRAL BANKS ARE DIVERSIFYING, SHOULDN’T YOU BE DOING IT TOO?

OH! And there was this quote from Canada’s Finance Minister, Flaherty said…”We are all concerned about the U.S. dollar”…

And then there was this… Haven’t you heard about the guy, known as the Cheater? it seems every day now, you hear people say now, Look out for the cheater, make way for the fool-hearted clown, look out for the cheater, he’s gonna build you up just to let you down… Come on… We all know who I’m talking about, you know him, you love him… It’s U.S. Treasury Sec. Tim Geithner!

Yes, the man that was in charge the NY Fed, and oversaw the banks in that region, of which, most of them needed TARP money didn’t they? Any way… The thing I want to talk about is his latest statement about the dollar… Here’s Timmy! “officials recognize that the dollar’s important role in the system conveys special burdens and responsibilities on us, and we are going to do everything necessary to make sure we sustain confidence.”

Yeah, sure you are… How many Treasuries have you auctioned off this year? Something like $1.6 Trillion? Now, that will give everyone in the world a warm and fuzzy about the dollar’s future won’t it? NOT!

OK, I had better go on to something else before I get too wound up!

The Bank of England (BOE) is also meeting this morning… And after an awful set of economic reports in the past month, the BOE members are scratching their heads and wondering what to do next… They cut rates to the bone… They’ve bought toxic assets from financial institutions… They’ve nationalized a few companies that were about to go under… They spent money on stimulus packages… And they’ve implemented Quantitative Easing…

Sounds like the U.S. doesn’t it? I’ll tell you who else it sounds like… It sounds like Japan in the last decade… I hate to be the one to half to tell these dolts that none of this works! It just makes a laughing stock out of your Central Bank, and puts your currency on the slippery slope downward…

Oh, but not to worry, Tim Geithner is maintaining the confidence in the dollar… ( I guess no one told Canada’s Finance Minister, eh?)

Again, Chuck, go on to something else, and quit coming back to this!

Well… Earlier in the Pfennig this morning, I told you about the rise in the A$… I didn’t tell you that it was trading at a 14-month high, as it was reported that Australian employment surged 40,600 in September! With a print like this, I think that’s it’s almost a given now that the RBA comes back in November and hikes rates again!

Another currency at a 14-month high is the New Zealand dollar / kiwi… Remember how I’ve told you about the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) Gov. Bollard, and his penchant for jawboning kiwi lower? I despise him for these things, as a Central Banker, your job is to protect the value of your currency, not diss it!

Well, now Bollard has company… New Zealand Finance Minister, Bill English, has this to say… “We’re uncomfortable with it (kiwi) at this stage in the economic cycle.” You see, Mr. English is concerned that the economic recovery will be stamped out with a strong kiwi… Well, I’ve got a cure for you Mr. English… Tell Bollard and the boys over at the RBNZ not to raise interest rates, and that will do the trick! It’ll stop the speculation in its tracks! However, if the RBNZ does raise rates next month, then you have no one to blame but yourselves!

OK… Let’s get back to Gold, before we head to the recap and the Big Finish!

I did a video yesterday on Gold… And I talked about how you can go about your life without an inflation hedge in your back pocket and suffer the consequences of not only having your purchasing power reduced by the falling dollar, but having what dollars you have left eaten away by inflation… OR… you can get that inflation hedge… and put it away for a rainy day… or pull out to play it like a “Get Out of Jail Free Card” when inflation hits…

To recap… Gold has soared to another all-time high of $1,055 overnight. And the non-dollar currencies are all gaining VS the dollar on the thoughts that a global recovery will result in wider yield differentials in those currencies VS the dollar. A$ and kiwi have both traded at 14-month highs overnight… And… We could see some downside risk to the euro if ECB President Trichet decides to defend the dollar today after the ECB meeting this morning.

Currencies today 10/8/09: A$ .9050, kiwi .7398, C$ .9475, euro 1.4770, sterling 1.6060, Swiss .9745, rand 7.3440, krone 5.6545, SEK 6.9890, forint 182.75, zloty 2.8655, koruna 17.4375, RUB 29.60, yen 88.30, sing 1.39, HKD 7.75, INR 46.36, China 6.8260, pesos 13.31, BRL 1.7480, dollar index 76.03, Oil $70.23, 10-year 3.19%, Silver $17.84, and Gold… $1,055.08

That’s it for today… And for me this week, as Chris will have the conn on the Pfennig tomorrow. My beloved Cardinals took game one of the playoffs on the chin last night, leaving 14 runners on base… UGH! It’s a BIG night tonight for us here as the Cardinals play game two… The Hockey Blues have their home opener, and my beloved Missouri Tigers take on Big Bad Nebraska! I’m heading down to the game with oldest son, Andrew, and friends. It looks like we’re going to be soaked from the rain! UGH! I’ll talk to you again on Monday, God willing… So, have a Thunderin’ Thursday today, and a wonderful weekend ahead… Go Tigers!

 

Subscribe to Chucks FREE daily letter HERE.

 

Two decades ago, Chuck Butler embarked on his extensive career in foreign investments as the Director of Operations for the Fixed Income Division of the Mark Twain Bank. He oversaw the clearing and custody of all bond department trades and Mark Twain portfolio transactions.

In 1992, he became the Chief International Bond Trader and Director of Risk Management for the Mark Twain Bank, and was responsible for trading global bonds and currencies, as well and overall risk management. In that same year, Mr. Butler began composing his now decade-old daily currency market commentary, A Pfennig for Your Thoughts—a play on the American aphorism “a penny for your thoughts”(the pfennig is the Germany equivalent of a penny). The Pfennig started as some handwritten market notes and witty anecdotes circulated every morning to help traders stay on top of the economic, currency, and market happenings. Butler’s “Daily Pfennig,” as it is more commonly called today, has become a popular resource for currency investors and traders alike.

In 1999, Mr. Butler joined the team that launched EverBank as the Senior Vice President of EverBank World Markets. He oversees the trading desk and operations for over 12,000 individual and corporate clients, both in the United States and abroad, who look to EverBank for FDIC-insured World Currency Deposit Accounts, and Single Currency and Index CDs . Chuck is also a frequently quoted and respected analyst of the currency market; in 2003 and 2004, he has appeared on, was featured or quoted in, or referenced by: the Wall Street Journal, US News and World Report, CBS Market Watch, USA Today, CNNfn, the Chicago Tribune and many other publications.