Daily Updates

China’s Economy Will Leapfrog U.S. by 2016?…Here’s Why it Won’t

IMF Forecast: Can China Really Overtake the U.S. Economy by 2016?

According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) “World Economic Outlook,” China’s output will surpass that of the United States in 2016 – only five years from now.

But don’t worry. The IMF calculation is based on “purchasing power parity” (PPP), which does not reflect real money. It relies on projecting China’s stellar growth rates five years into the future. And it relies on Chinese official statistics, which are more than a little questionable.

(In fact, after the media storm that resulted, the IMF apparently even soft-pedaled its prediction that China would leapfrog the United States in just five years; in a subsequent interview, an IMF spokesman reportedly said that, by non-PPP measures, the U.S. economy “will still be 70% larger by 2016.” A recent World Bank forecast concluded that China could overtake the United States by 2030.)

This prediction – and the attention it continues to draw – serves a useful purpose, particularly if it’s given the scrutiny that it deserves.

For global investors with China-based holdings, it reminds us of that country’s long-term potential – and the fact that such potential is always tempered by near-term risk. For the rest of us, it reminds us that China’s ascendance is inevitable – in fact, is already happening – and will be with us for a long time, even if that Asian giant isn’t immediately going to overwhelm the rest of the world.

And for our elected leaders in Washington, the IMF report – false alarm or not – should serve as a wakeup call to attack and address the many problems that threaten this country’s global leadership.

IMF Report: A Closer Look

I had some problems with this prediction from the moment it hit the headlines.

Let’s start with the IMF statistics themselves. They measure gross domestic product (GDP) on the basis of “purchasing power parity,” rather than by market exchange rates.

That makes sense if you’re comparing living standards: If you are talking about what the typical China consumer can buy, he or she is about one-sixth as well off as his or her American counterpart, not one-twentieth.

However, the use of the PPP measure makes much less sense when looking at international trade or political power. That’s because individual purchasing power includes such items as haircuts, which are much cheaper in Beijing than in Boston (except, doubtless, at a couple of very overpriced salons in Shanghai or one of the other burgeoning financial centers) and cannot easily be traded internationally.

On the other hand, goods that are traded internationally are subject to global market forces and are generally about the same price everywhere they are sold. In fact, some of those goods may even be cheaper in the United States, since our distribution system is more efficient and our tariffs lower.

….read more HERE (scroll down to this image below)

GlobalHeavyweights2

….read more HERE (scroll down to this image above)

More Bernanke BS. No surprises, no real changes. Rates to stay low over the future, and the Fed will probably be buying Treasuries, but they won’t call it QE3. The market reaction — precious metals continued higher, the dollar sank further, and stocks continued their climb. The market’s reaction to the Bernanke Speech — more of the same, with the Fed denying that there is any danger of inflation. The Fed’s real worry continues to be deflation. The Fed is afraid that if they exit the market deflation will immediately take over. — Richard Russell Dow Theory Letters

What the hell does it mean anymore? Really? “A Strong and stable dollar is in the best interest of the US and global economy.” What does it mean?

Because it certainly does not mean the Federal Reserve or the US Treasury is acting to strengthen the value of the dollar – it is argued every day that they are doing the exact opposite. So if they are merely lying to us, and they’re intention now is to devalue the US dollar for one or many undisclosed reasons, then at least we can take solace in the fact that they’re doing a damn good job at it.

Looking at the other end of the propaganda spectrum, are we experiencing or about to experience a dollar crisis?

Stock Indices Forecast

The piece below is actually an integral part of Dow Theory. Charles Dow placed great emphasis on dividend yields, and Mr. Vronsky, who is editor and a partner of the great “Gold-Eagle” site, is obviously a serious student of the stock market. This piece by Mr. Vronsky should be of interest to all my subscribers. – Richard Russell Dow Theory Letters

2011 Echoes From The Past (Part 2)

By  I. M. Vronsky

Stock Indices Forecasts Based On Dividend Yields

In March 1997 I did an analysis addressing Stock Evaluation based upon Dividend Yield.

Ten years later in March 2007 I did an updated market analysis.

On April 17, 2011 I posted 2011 Echoes From The Past (Part 1).

The above three studies addressed one of the most fundamental and basic evaluation techniques, based upon DIVIDEND YIELD of the stock index. The principal theory is that if the Average Dividend Yield is too low, it reflects an over evaluation of the stocks making up the index.…ie stocks are over-bought or too high in price. Consequently, a stock market correction will cause the Average Dividend Yield to rise to acceptable levels.

A simple test of the dividend yield as a forecaster of future stock prices is presented in the table below (courtesy of “Stock Market Logic”). Shown are the one year returns which have ensued from various DJIA dividend yield intervals since 1941.

Dividend Yields and Stock Prices 1941-1975

…..read more and view more charts HERE

 

Brief Excerpt from Richard Russell’s Dow Theory Letters. One of the best values anywhere in the financial world at only a $300 subscription to get his DAILY report for a year. HERE to subscribe. Amongst his achievements Richard was in cash before the 2008/2009 Crash and he has been Bullish Gold since below $300 Ed Note: Richard Russell is bullish Silver and holds one of the largest single positions he has held since the 1950’s in the precious metals.

 

‘Sell in May and go away’ may not pay off this year: Use VIX options, futures and ETFs to hedge against declines

It’s that time of year again when investors look to the seasonal strategy of “Sell in May and Go Away” leading to the liquidation of market positions following the many months of gains. The strategy implies that investors should own Canadian and U.S. equities during a period of seasonal strength from the end of September to the end of April and avoid equities during a period of seasonal weakness from the beginning of May to the end of September.

This year however investors may want to ride out the summer, albeit with a bit of hedging for safety.

Outside of their average period of seasonal strength from October 28th to May 5th, North American equity indices have a history of mixed returns between May 6th and October 27th. The S&P 500 Index lost an average of 0.42 percent per period over the past 20 years from May 6th to October 27th, compared with an average gain per period of 8.82 percent during the favourable October to May period. Results are more pronounced for the S&P/TSX Composite Index. The Index lost an average of 1.09 percent per period from May to October over the past 20 years while gaining an average of 10.03 percent per period during the favourable timeframe. Performance by equity markets during the summer months tends to be random due to a lack of significant annual recurring events that favourably influence equity markets.

The strategy to take profits around May 5th worked on queue last year. Investors that exited market positions on May 3rd last year avoided a 15 percent drop by the S&P 500 Index over the course of two months. These investors also sidestepped the Flash Crash on May 6th when the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 900 points.

Valuation models suggest that the S&P 500 Index currently is fairly valued. Prior to entering the first quarter earnings season, the S&P 500 Index was trading at 18 times trailing earnings. However, strong consensus earnings growth estimates for 2011 imply that the S&P 500 Index is trading at only 13 times earnings for the current year. The average multiple for the S&P 500 Index over history has been around 16. Moreover, recent earnings beats and increased guidance suggests further revisions to growth expectations over the next 12-months.

Cyclical influences also may give reason for optimism through the current May to October timeframe. The pre-election year of the Presidential Election cycle typically extends positive returns for equity indices through to the third quarter of the year. Gains between May 5th and October 7th for the years preceding the Presidential election have averaged 4.3 percent over the last 60 years. The historic reason for optimism is efforts by the President to become more accommodative in policy-making in order to increase chances of his re-election or election of his party’s candidate. It remains to be seen whether President Obama will take this strategy in 2011.

North American equity markets currently have a positive technical profile. Recently, indices rebounded from oversold levels reached in mid- April. Last week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at a 33 month high. The S&P 500 Index is testing highs charted in February. A breakout to new highs implies upside potential of 4 percent to 5 percent this summer.

Timing for the “Sell in May and Go Away” strategy varies slightly each year and are fine tuned using technical analysis. For now, risk reward parameters for equity market exposure remains favourable. Investors concerned about a possible correction in equity markets in the May 6th to October 27th period can apply hedges to protect against downside risks. Hedge strategies include gaining exposure to the volatility index (VIX) via options, futures or ETFs, accumulating positions inversely correlated to broad market indices, and taking advantage of put option safety-lines for positions most at risk of declines.

Jon and Don Vialoux are authors of a free daily report on equity markets, sectors, commodities and Exchange Traded Funds. Reports are available at www.timingthemarket.ca and www.equityclock.com. Follow us on Twitter:@EquityClock

Tech Talk and EquityClock.com Seasonality Column in the Financial Post (Published yesterday at http://business.financialpost.com/2011/04/26/stay-in-may-this-year/

Commodity CD Pays Up to 10% a Year…. with Guaranteed Princple

Usually you can buy an investment anytime… but the window for this one closes in just a few days.

It Pays Up to 10% a Year… But ONLY if You Invest Before May 5

Without a doubt, it’s among the oddest investments I’ve researched.

Normally I’m poring over classic income securities — stocks, bonds, funds, and the like. I’m concerned about payout ratios… interest rates… economic forecasts.

This investment is different. You won’t find it on any exchange, and you won’t find a price chart. But don’t worry, it’s simpler to understand than any stock. Best of all, we’re guaranteed not to lose money.

You read that right. We won’t risk a dime. The downside is capped at 0%.

In return for that safety, the returns are capped at 10% per year. Considering this is as safe as your savings account, a possible 10% annual return is nothing to scoff at.

What I’ve found is a certificate of deposit (CD). But it’s not a run of the mill version you’d find at your local bank. Today, you’re lucky if regular CDs pay you more a couple percent.

That’s not the case here.

This CD is offered by EverBank — a specialty bank that offers many securities you can’t find elsewhere. The official name is the MarketSafe Diversified Commodities CD.

It’s indexed to a basket of commodities. The five-year CD tracks the spot prices of a basket of 10 commodities (WTI crude oil, gold, silver, platinum, soybeans, corn, sugar, copper, nickel, and lean hogs).

Get 10 popular commodities in a single CD

See a hypothetical 5-year performance of this CD»

Find out why this is a safer choice for commodity investing»

If these commodities gain ground, at the end of five years you get your money back plus the sum of each year’s average return. If they lose money over that time, you simply receive your principal back.

As a hypothetical example, this CD would have returned a total of 27.2% after five years if it had been issued on January 1, 2005.

That’s much better than a savings account… with roughly the same amount of risk.

Like other CDs, this product is not exchange traded. Investors must open an account with EverBank directly. And like other banks, EverBank is FDIC insured. The minimum investment for this CD is $1,500 and the bank charges no account fees. The funding deadline for this particular product is May 5, 2011 and the issue date is May 17.

Many investment advisors recommend diversifying a portfolio with commodities. But prices of the world’s basic necessities are very volatile. These are hardly the risks a late-stage investor wants to take on.

But there are solid arguments for long-term demand growth for commodities, and thanks to EverBank, there is now a safer way to get exposure to the commodities market… without risking a dime.

[Note: Be sure to keep an eye out for next week’s Dividend Opportunities. I’ll show you how to earn more than $1,260 every month in dividends]

Always searching for your next paycheck,

Amy Calistri
Chief Investment Strategist — The Daily Paycheck

P.S. — You can learn more about this certificate of deposit by clicking HERE to visit EverBank’s website.

test-php-789