Daily Updates

Jim Rogers: Corn breaks out to All Time Highs & Farmers will drive Lamborgini’s, just shorted Bonds Friday, the Stock Market is Caving in. Jim Rogers on Everything.
Each morning you turn to your favorite gold investment website to see the current gold price. What you see is the correct price, but in the currency of your choosing. There are two prices, the buy and sell price. You assume these prices allow the dealer to make an income from the difference. You assume that these prices are an accurate reflection of supply and demand.
But are these prices accurate? The answer is far from easy.
We begin by observing the global market.
Gold’s Global Market
The day starts just after the dateline in Japan and China. If you were there and wandered down to your friendly neighborhood bank and asked for the latest gold prices, they would give you prices they were prepared to buy and sell gold. They allow their costs to get the gold from source, transporting it to their branch. From there, they are onto the ‘international’ price spread, widening it to their quote price.
The time involved to make such a delivery is factored into the price by matching the bank price and the price it charges. But their bank has to get that gold from source too. The average Chinese bank imports the gold they sell, so they must allow for the transport from source. They turn to the largest source of physical gold, London, where the five member banks of the gold Fixing handle about 90% of the world’s physical gold.
The Chinese bank would be able (by phone or electronically) to buy their gold at the twice daily Fixings in London (www.goldfixing.com), a price that has no buy/sell spread. The ‘Fixed’ price is the price that both buying and selling takes place. Often it is bought “loco London – delivery Zurich” or some other place (i.e. Hong Kong). This allows the members to sell gold held in Zurich and not London. Of course, there are variations. In China, we pay a price that relates to the present gold price. This price might be different from the price the bank paid weeks before. This all seems risky…
Removing Price Risk
It sounds risky, but the banks are not there to take risks.
They turn to COMEX and its futures and options gold market to allay these risks.
It works like this: let’s say the Chinese bank bought 10,000 ounces of gold to sell through their branches in China. Knowing the price, they immediately sell the same on the futures market for ‘delivery’ (it would not be delivered because only 5% of COMEX deals are for physical delivery) at around the time they believe it would be sold in China. (They fall into the category of Commercials’ in the above COT report)
With the price risk neutralized, they would aim to make their profits based on total costs (i.e. transport, Insurance and holding costs until the gold is sold) plus their mark-up. The buying/selling price would reflect these costs in the ‘spread’ (between buying and selling).
So the price in China at the first part of the day will reflect the stock they have there for sale and the demand supply pressures at the moment. Until the bank can offset the market pressures (once London opens) there is greater volatility because it is a smaller market. So the ‘real gold price’ in China is a wider spread price than you see on your computer screen.
In the U.S.
The same pressures apply in the United States. Although it is a far more developed market, it is still not the home of the physical gold market. Electronically, the developed world markets are able to smooth out price differentials (right through to the London gold Fixing member banks) between the Fixes. This is called Arbitrage. This gives the impression of a faster flow of gold between markets, but essentially the ability of the banks and markets to reflect the bulk of global demand/supply quickly is remarkable and efficient. Actual supplies follow up days after the original transactions to their final destination. In the U.S. the real price of gold is very close to the price on your computer screen; the spread, however, widens with the lower quantity you buy. The more you buy the narrower the spread.
Most U.S. investors want the price of gold to be the price they see on their screen. And that’s why the gold Exchange Traded Funds did so well. At 1% costs or less, these shares were ‘cheaper’ than other forms of physical gold and cheaper to store and insure. No shipping costs are involved, so U.S. investors can rely on their screen prices to represent the price of gold they pay, plus a little brokerage commission.
Price ‘smoothing’
The larger gold markets of the world, centered in London, have the ability to quickly ‘net out’ transactions down to the final buyer and seller of the gold. A gold producer will have a buyer on contract for the bulk of his supply as it comes out of the refinery. This is to secure his cash flow without having to wait for buyers.
We would venture to say that 90% – 100% of gold producer’s have instant buyers to take contracted amounts. This figure may well be in excess of 90% of his supply and often 100 %. This process has allowed the ‘real’ price of gold to be closer to investor’s expectations than in the underdeveloped world. (Asia will get there in time) Buying shares in gold Exchange Traded Funds in South Africa, Australia, the U.S. or Europe is done at the price shown on the sites of the gold Exchange Traded Funds. It is the real price of gold.
With the bullion banks now supplied on contract to pay the market price of those supplies (with margins built into the contract) they now face only the risk of finding buyers.
Demand
In a 24-hour market, demand is far less coordinated. Manufacturers of gold products (i.e. jewelers, technology companies, etc) are more likely to ensure reliable supplies through bullion banks, on contract; general public investing in gold, however, is far less predictable. Investors who hold gold to give them financial security appear according to their own timetable. Profit-seeking investors are less predictable, appearing when they believe the gold price is at the right entry level and selling when they believe it will turn down. They appear in varying numbers for varying quantities at varying times and at varying prices….
Dispersal of Real Demand
One reason governments and bullion banks are able to manage the gold markets is their ability to disperse demand for physical gold. Demand is channeled into non-gold markets that ride the gold price without affecting it. These are…
- COMEX as we mentioned earlier, is one of these that only sees physical movement of gold on around 5% of its transactions.
- Options do not involve gold itself.
- Gold shares are investments in corporations, not in gold itself.
The above markets did not affect the gold price. The price is controlled by investors who hold bullion, alongside central banks whose stocks of gold have overhung the market for the last quarter of last century. This distorts the real price of gold because it does not reflect the true demand for gold by investors. This demand is kept away from the market by these derivatives.
Insurance and storage adds to the cost of buying physical gold deterring most investors from buying gold. That’s why the above markets formed the main route of investors to the gold price. This was until the arrival of gold Exchange Traded Fund shares. Coinciding with the arrival of the gold ETF’s central banks ceased selling gold and became buyers again.
Traditionally, the real gold investor bought coins and small bullion bars. But these were, in themselves, not in sufficient quantity to seriously affect the gold price.
Once individuals and institutions saw the advantages of the gold Exchange traded gold shares, the rush into gold in the developed world was huge. These investors are not profit-seekers (as can be seen in the constancy of the total gold holdings in them). They are long-term holders. But within their ranks are large investors who take profits from time to time. These funds allow a better reflection of gold demand and their impact on the gold price better reflect demand/supply.
Uncontrollable physical demand
Apart from the huge demand detailed above (particularly for the SPDR gold Exchange Traded Funds shares in the U.S.) the big new feature in physical demand has been from both Indian and Chinese investors in gold. Indian demand has been a major source of investment in physical gold for decades now, but alongside the development of the Indian economy the growth in demand there has reached record levels. Expect this to continue at a rapid pace.
The same applies to China, but at a far faster pace. While India has been amassing gold for decades, China is still in its first decade of being buyers of gold at all different levels. They have a ways to catch up. Both the Chinese government and the Chinese people are involved in acquiring gold and at a rapidly rising pace.
Add to the above demand the growing demand from central banks (South America now) and you have a globally diversified, long-term, physical gold holding demand that is uncontrollable by the forces that used to control the gold markets and the gold price. The fact that this demand is uncontrollable puts it beyond the reach of the developed world’s monetary system and beyond the control of the bullion banks. The ability to control the gold price has diminished to all intents and purposes.

Mr. Market must be looking at the bond market the way an IMF chief eyes a chambermaid….
But first, let’s look at what happened yesterday…
Finally, a day when the Dow did not go down. Instead, it went up 75 points.
Otherwise, oil rose above $100…the 10-year T-note yield rose to 299 basis points…and gold gained $4.
A mixed, inconclusive day, in other words.
But trying to keep up with the trends is a waste of time anyway. You get whipsawed and beaten up.
Better to get ahead of the trend. Which ain’t easy. Because you’ve got to figure out which direction the trend is headed.
So….dear reader….what’s going on?
We asked you first!
Here’s a letter from one of our Family Office members:
(1) If we redefined GDP to EXCLUDE all government spending, because it is all “recycled” earnings of the private sector, how does the whole question of recovery vs. recession/depression look? I suspect this is one way to reconcile the fact that the financial community says we are in recovery, but Main Street says the opposite. Seems like a good topic for the Daily Reckoning.
(2) If all financial reporting were referenced to gold, rather than USD, how does the picture look? (Actually I know the general answer to this one; the economy looks AWFUL, and housing is back to pre-1990 levels.) I find it interesting that all the financial asset managers I’ve talked to REALLY don’t like it when I ask “how is your performance relative to gold?”.
As to the first question, the answer is simple. Take out the feds – who are redistributing wealth, not creating it – and US GDP growth was about zero for the last decade.
There. That’s a trend. Here we are in the 21st century. With all that technology. And all that money. And all those sophisticated Wall Street geniuses allocating capital like nobody’s business. And what do we get? Growth at about the same rate as during the Middle Ages.
Remember how the latest communications technology was supposed to speed up growth? How could you have forgotten? Back in the ‘90s it was taken for granted that faster, better communications would make people smarter, more efficient and more productive.
It was widely believed that the old ways of creating wealth – by saving, learning, investing – were obsolete. Because you didn’t need savings. You could build on knowledge!
No more trial and error. Mistakes were soooo 20th century!
That’s what they said.
We knew it was nonsense. Imagine Napoleon’s starving, freezing troops…trapped in Russia. Those that didn’t freeze to death were shot to pieces by the Russkies. Imagine giving them the blueprint to a nuclear bomb. Or even the designs for an aeroplane. Or, give them an iPad! What good would it have done them? None!
Every bit of information that is not useful is a burden.
But most people didn’t see it that way. They thought the communications revolution would speed up the rate of GDP growth and make us all rich.
It didn’t happen that way. The decade following the communications revolution was dry, desolate, and barren. Take out the feds’ redistributed loot and the private sector registered approximately no growth at all.
It was a complete bust. A failure. A flop.
Go figure.
Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning
Dice Have No Memory: Big Bets & Bad Economics from Paris to the Pampas, the new book from Bill Bonner, is now available for purchase. It is the definitive compendium of Bill’s daily reckonings from more than a decade: 1999-2010. Whether your new to these Daily Reckonings, or one of Bill’s “long suffering” readers, this is one you surely won’t want to miss. Click here to get your copy today.
For the first time since September 10, 2010, the “dumb money” indicator has turned bearish.