Uncategorized

Thanks for joining us last night. This is just a quick note to summarize what I heard at the Emergency Gold Summit – Mike

Central Agreement 
 
All three analysts thought the bull market in gold was not over. The timing depended on the specific style of analysis used. 
 
Martin Armstrong 
 
Marty stated the norm is that the majority of the price depreciation in any decline takes place early in the move followed by a significant consolidation. 
 
Marty’s forecast revolves around the US dollar. I found his observation that the US dollar is the only game in town fascinating. Many people don’t realize that when it comes to the ability of financial markets to absorb major moves of capital there are only three choices – the US, Japan and Europe.  (You can make an argument that the British pound is also large enough to join the group.)
 
But with the Japanese government determined to devalue the yen and with Europe desperate problems Marty thinks that the US dollar is the only default position. And that will provide huge impetus for an up move in the greenback, which will propel stocks and will hold the price of gold (measured in US dollars down). 
 
Marty thinks that the confidence in the US dollar will start to wane starting in October, 2015 and then accelerating at least into 2017. Gold will move inversely to the dollar with first major resistance coming at $2,300 – the old high adjusting for inflation. And then moving on to the $5,000 level. 
 
Silver’s ultimate move will be to the $100 area. Once it goes above the old highs at $50 the move should accelerate. But be prepared for lower prices on the shorter term. 
 
He thinks that June could provide a short-term turning point but the bigger month will be September – centering on the German election. If Merkel doesn’t get reelected it could accelerate money leaving Europe and possibly push gold to its ultimate low.    
 
The key is currency movement – especially into the US Dollar. One more thing – Marty has correctly called the increasing level of volatility well before current analysts had looked it up in the dictionary – and he sees that trend intensifying. Be quick on your feet.
 
Mark Leibovit
 
Mark is a trader whose method identifies short term swings in the market. Long term he is very on bullish gold and silver but so far the market has given him no sign of reversing its downside trend. 
 
His targets for a move up are $1489 and then on to the old support in the $1530 range to get a bigger move going. Then with other smaller resistance levels along the way $1796 must be passed to bring the old high of $1922 into play.  
 
On the downside Mark sees support at the recent low of $1341 broken to bring in a series of lower lows into play with potential risk down to $923 if the support is threatened. 
 
Mark reminded us that the market does not have to go up from here but rather can rally strongly and then come down and test or break the lows. 
 
He sees the opportunity for a bounce in the major gold stocks but investors have to be prepared for new lows. The charts have not reversed, which warns that the downtrend is in tact. 
 
Silver has hit Mark’s initial downside target in the $21 range but if that doesn’t hold $19 and ultimately $14 are in play. ON the upside silver must first clear the $24.71 high from April 29, then the next resistance is 26.00. To re-establish the uptrend silver needs to clear 24.71, 28.20, 29.48, 32.58 and then 35.32. Ultimately Mark see silver getting over $100. 
 
David Bensimon 
 
I have include a few charts below but in a nutshell the period between May 24 and June 7 is an important time window for a low. 
 
His preferred scenario is a low in gold at $1280 to $1300.  David sees 2014 and 2016 as preferred dates for a significant upmove. 
 
In silver, David’s preferred scenario would be to see the low right here at $21. Hi upside count continues to be $125 long term.
 
 
 
 
 
 

7 New Weight Loss Supplements That Really Work

weightlossWith all the new weight loss medication sentering the market – and engendering controversy – many people are also looking to supplements to aid weight loss. But a visit to those shelves at your local Whole Foods or other health food store, and you’re guaranteed to feel overwhelmed.  Which really work and which don’t? And are they safe?

For information, I looked at the recommendations of prominent naturopathic doctors and the organization Natural Standard, a reputable database of the latest research on supplements.  You’ve likely never heard of many of the supplements listed here, but they’ve all a Natural Standard Grade A or B for having positive scientific evidence supporting their use for weight loss.

….read about all 7 that work HERE

GREAT TRUTHS 

1. In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress. — John Adams 

2. If you don’t read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed. — Mark Twain 

3. Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But then I repeat myself. — Mark Twain 

4. I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. –Winston Churchill 

5. A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul. — George Bernard Shaw 

6. A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money. — G. Gordon Liddy 

7. Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. –James Bovard, Civil Libertarian (1994) 

8. Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries. — Douglas Case, Classmate of Bill Clinton at Georgetown University. 

9. Giving money and power to government is like giving whisky and car keys to teenage boys. — P.J. O’Rourke, Civil Libertarian 

10. Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. — Frederic Bastiat, French economist(1801-1850) 

11. Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. –Ronald Reagan (1986) 

12. I don’t make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. — Will Rogers 

13. If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free! — P. J. O’Rourke 

14. In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other. –Voltaire (1764) 

15. Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you! — Pericles ( 430 B.C. and still true today! ) 

16. No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session. — Mark Twain (1866) 

17. Talk is cheap, except when Congress does it. — Anonymous 

18. The government is like a baby’s alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other. — Ronald Reagan 

19. The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. — Winston Churchill 

20. The only difference between a tax man and a taxidermist is that the taxidermist leaves the skin. — Mark Twain 

21. The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools. — Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903) 

22. There is no distinctly Native American criminal class, save Congress. — Mark Twain 

23. What this country needs are more unemployed politicians –Edward Langley, Artist (1928-1995) 

24. A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. — Thomas Jefferson 

25. We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. — Aesop 

26. The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s Money.—–Margret Thatcher 

27. “Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him” 

Better take a closer look at the North American Indian.—–Henry Ford 

FIVE BEST SENTENCES 

1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. 

2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. 

3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. 

4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. 

5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work, because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation! 

Can you think of a reason for not sharing this? 
Neither could I.

There is no better topic than gold to polarise an investment discussion. So the recent sharp drop in the metal’s price has pushed to fever pitch the debate between two camps with deeply held convictions: those who view gold as overvalued and lacking both income and capital appreciation attributes; and those who feel it is only a matter of time before others appreciate again gold’s unique role as an antidote for virtually any economic ill that could hit a diversified investment portfolio.

As interesting as this debate is, it understates the potential significance of what has taken place. The recent volatility speaks to a dynamic that has played out elsewhere and, more importantly, underpins the gradually widening phenomenon of western market-based systems that have been operating with artificial pricing for an unusually prolonged period.

The consensus gold narrative is a familiar one. In an increasingly fluid ecosystem, and a world in which a growing number of central banks have ballooned their balance sheets aggressively, investors rushed into gold as a means to hedge against identifiable risks (inflation), as well as to counter nervousness about big uncertainties (including previously unthinkable disruptions to economic systems).

Rising prices generated even higher prices, significantly disconnecting valuation from underlying fundamentals of physical demand and supply – that is until an otherwise insignificant bit of news pulled the rug from under the operating paradigm.

While lower inflationary expectations and surging equities played a role, the real catalyst for the dramatic price drop was a rumour that Cyprus could be forced to sell its holdings by its European partners. This involved a tiny amount of gold (valued at less than $1bn at the time), but it made investors suddenly pay attention to the possibility of significant supply hitting the markets from other European economies (particularly Italy with holdings of some $130bn).

This simple change was enough to bring the gold price down 15 per cent in less than a week. Since then, the metal has struggled to re-establish a firm footing, (it is currently trading at about $1,385 a troy ounce).
In corporate terms, think of the underlying dynamic as one of a powerful brand where valuation has become completely divorced from the intrinsic attributes of the product – thus rendering it vulnerable to any change in conventional wisdom (or what economists would characterise as a stable disequilibrium).

Over the past year, a similar dynamic has played out in Apple and Facebook shares.

After a steady increase to just over $700, Apple’s share price hit a dramatic air pocket. Its price collapsed to less than $400. Today, it trades at around $440. Why? Basically because, as powerful as it is, the brand’s “enchantment” (to use a term coined by author and former Apple employee Guy Kawasaki) ended up inducing investors (inadvertently) to disconnect valuation from the reality of the furious catch-up on the part of Apple’s competitors.

In the case of Facebook, it was widespread familiarity with the name, and the associated hype, that persuaded investors to oversubscribe to an IPO that valued the company at $38. The stock traded up briefly before dropping below $20 as a large number of professionals resisted the massive and blatant disconnect between valuation and fundamentals. Today it is trading around $26.

Of course, these are name specific examples; and, to the extent that insights can be generalised, they point to the fact that financial markets overshoot on both sides. Yet, today, I believe there is an additional insight from gold in a world where central banks, pursuing higher growth and greater job creation, have inserted a sizeable wedge between financial markets and economic fundamentals.

Firm and repeated central-bank commitment to asset purchases has done more than push a growing number of investors to add portfolio risk at evermore elevated prices. It has also repressed market volatility, lowered correlations and given the illusion of stability – all in the context of a complicated ecosystem characterised by unusual sovereign dynamics, changing regulations, considerable tail risks, widespread need for new growth and job models, and innovation that accentuates rather than contains worrying inequalities.

Essentially, today’s global economy is in the midst of its own stable disequilibrium; and markets have outpaced fundamentals on the expectation that western central banks, together with a more functional political system, will deliver higher growth. If this fails to materialise, investors will worry about a lot more than the intrinsic value of gold.

Mike Campbell’s Goofy involves his analysis of the ongoing loss of confidence in Government.  

(the beginning of Mike’s Goofy begins at the 35:28 mark on the lefthand time scale, or the -3:06 mark on the right)

{mp3}mtmay18goofy{/mp3}

test-php-789