Energy & Commodities

Is there Gold in Fort Knox?

u-s- bullion depository

Is there gold in Fort Knox? That question is completely irrelevant. Why? Will it really make a difference? The stories of no gold in the vault are just spun by people so desperate to support a gold bull market it is just crazy. I was given a tour of the NY Fed years ago and there was gold there. The US started going after the Swiss and threatening to seize their assets here in the USA for hiding Americans with assets. Without fanfare, the Swiss quietly took ALL their gold and moved it out of the USA. The stories spun around Germany were nonsense as well.

Try looking at this dispassionately. This is not the stuff that is going to make gold rise. We do not need this type of tin-foil hat nonsense to create a bull market and it really doesFAR MORE damage than the Goldbugs suspect. People who are not buying gold refrain from doing so because of stories like that. They do not take all these claims seriously and perceive the idea of buying gold as the lunatic fringe when based on stories that cannot be proved.

Gold will rise because it is the HEDGE against government. It is ONE investment that enables one to move their wealth from one medium of exchange (currency) to another when the new one comes down because of fiscal mismanagement. They also tout hyperinflation but both Germany and Zimbabwe could not sell debt so they printed. Advanced societies sell debt today. It is worse because it is printing money that pays interest. Real estate and shares in companies will provide that same mechanism as gold did in the case in Germany. In fact, the new currency to replace the hyperinflation was backed by real estate. But for shares and real estate to survive requires the society to survive or in other words blink BEFORE the Mad Max conclusion.\

….read more HERE

How to trade gold, silver & precious metal miners

How to trade gold and other precious metals related investments is not that complex. But you must be willing to wait for price to provide low risk entry points before getting involved. Precious metals are like any other investment in respect to trading and investing in them. There are times when you should be long, times to be in cash and times to be short (benefit from falling prices).

Since 2011 when gold and silver started another major bull market correction the best position has been to move to cash or sell/write optionsagainst your positions to protect your investment until the next trend resumes.

If you take a look at the chart below of gold you will notice that in 2008 we had a similar breakdown in price, which purged the market of investors who where long gold. And if you compare the last two breakdowns they look very much the same.  If price holds true then much higher prices are likely to unfold at the end of 2013.

The key here is for the price to move and hold above the major resistance line. If it can do that then we are looking at a possible breakout to $2,600-$3,500 gold. With that being said, gold and silver may just be starting a bear market. Depending what the price of gold does when my resistance level is touched, my outlook may change from bullish to bearish.

Also with last week’s economic numbers getting better in the United States, I do have concerns that gold may be starting a bear market, but we will not know for several more months yet.

C1

…..read next page HERE

The Greatest Lie the Fed Ever Told

Public life bumbles along under a combination of false pretenses and self-imposed delusions.

At the start of last week, it was widely reported that US central bankers had gone as far as they were willing to go. There were voices in the Fed, said the news, urging caution. There would be no further monetary stimulus measures, said the commentators.

Investors grew cautious.

But by the end of the week, they were rolling the dice again. The Fed was working hard to fight the impression that it had either lost its nerve or recovered its senses. From The New York Times:

The Federal Reserve said Wednesday that its economic stimulus campaign would press forward at the same pace it has maintained since December, putting to rest for now any suggestion that it was leaning toward doing less.

The Fed emphasized that it was ready to increase or decrease its efforts to spur growth and reduce unemployment as necessary, a more balanced position than it took earlier in the year, reflecting the reality that a strong winter has once again yielded to a disappointing spring.

It was the first time that the Fed had explicitly mentioned the possibility of doing more in a policy statement, although officials, including the Fed’s chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, have made the point repeatedly in public remarks.

With the wind of the Fed at their backs, investors put out full sail. On Friday, they were skimming along nicely, riding high on a tide of “EZ” money. “Don’t fight the Fed,” said the analysts. The Fed is pumping… stocks are going to rise.

Of course, it’s not that simple. Zimbabwe pumped. Stocks rose… for a while. But ultimately, it takes more than cheap money to make businesses more valuable. And too much cheap money is contagious; stocks become cheap too.

The Rich Get Richer

Some investors are cynical about it. They know the Fed’s easy money will have negative consequences for almost everyone. But they also know how the game works – money printing may be bad for the economy and the little guys, but it can be good for the rich guys. They’re the ones who own stocks! From Bloomberg:

The world’s 200 richest people added $44.6 billion to their collective net worth this week as the Dow Jones industrial average reached 15,000 for the first time.

Alisher Usmanov, 59, whose fortune rose $61.2 million during the week, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, said in an interview at Bloomberg’s Moscow offices that he recently spent about $100 million buying Apple Inc. shares in anticipation they will rise.

Cynical investors know it’s a game. But a lot of people believe the claptrap. They think that the Fed – through some magic never fully explained or demonstrated – helps make people better off.

The Fed did not exist for the first million or so years that proto-humans have been walking on two legs. It is only in the last 100 years – a blink of an eye, in evolutionary terms – that the Fed has been around… and only little more than half a century since it took up today’s activist theories. And it’s been scarcely four years since it began to apply them so aggressively.

Is there any evidence that modern central banking makes things better over the long run? Has one sou or farthing been added to the world’s wealth as a result of the Fed’s policies? If so, everyone is keeping quiet about it…

Instead, central banks seem to have done something that most people would have considered impossible: They seem to have stopped progress.

Maybe it’s a coincidence. But it’s as though time stopped dead when the Fed took up its role of improving the economy.

If you adjust GDP to inflation and calculate it the way the federal government did when Jimmy Carter was president, you see that the real, disposable income of the average American has not improved since the first Eisenhower administration.

That’s more than 50 years with no real economic progress… almost exactly the same 50 years in which the Fed has been so actively trying to make the economy work better.

Go figure…

bbdelogo-200-86

 

Regards,

Bill Bonner

Bill

 

Bill Bonner started Diary of a Rogue Economist to share his over 30 years of economics and market experience with as many interested readers as possible.

Diary of a Rogue Economist is always free, and it’s delivered to your email each business day.

Have a question for our editorial team?
Contact Us

Special Report: How to Find Money in Any Market

Money: Mining companies need it and investors want to know that companies will use that money to make them money. An innovative conference sponsored by the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (SME), called “Current Trends in Mining Finance—An Executive’s Guide: What Are Lenders, Investors Looking For?”, brought together about 145 experts who were actively funding and running companies—and looking for answers. In this interview with The Gold Report, SME Executive Director David Kanagy and Conference Co-Chair Tim Alch share some insights about alternative funding that could help more companies survive the year.

Screen shot 2013-05-06 at 1.36.01 PMThe Gold Report: You put on a two-day conference last week in New York, “Current Trends in Mining Finance—An Executive’s Guide: What Are Lenders, Investors looking For?” Why this topic now?

David Kanagy: SME has held some financial conferences in the past, but it has been more than 10 years since the last one, so it was time. The program was intended for senior executives and mining industry specialists, bankers, analysts and investors. It covered project evaluation and executive decision making, mergers and acquisitions, tax and accounting issues, resources and reserve reporting, and other risk factors that are making the current financial market for the minerals industry a bit difficult right now.

TGR: What has changed in the market since 2008? Is this really the worst market you’ve seen or does it just feel like that?

Tim Alch: The market rebounded nicely immediately after the 2008 financial crisis largely as a result of China’s continued growth. However, in the last two years China has been perceived as slowing from an average of 10% gross domestic product (GDP) annual growth to something approximating 7–7.5%. This growth is on a larger GDP number, however, which is important to understand.

Today, we are also concerned about the European market and, most immediately, price support in the commodity sector. Over the last 10 years, costs of production have been steadily rising so there is considerable concern right now that the strong pricing environment the metals and minerals sectors enjoyed may be subject to pressure. The environment has become very selective and risk-off, particularly in the global mining finance space in the past 9–10 months.

The financial markets impact lending and investor appetite for risk. Luckily alternative sources of capital are stepping into the fray. Private equity, as well as sovereign wealth funds and state-owned enterprises from Korea, Japan and China, are now investing in natural resources.

TGR: Are countries looking to secure access to coal, oil and base metals to fund future growth or are they looking at it purely from a return on investment standpoint?

TA: In certain sectors and geographies, stability and security of supply of raw materials is a concern and it is driving certain parties to invest with just more than internal rate of return concerns.

TGR: Where is this supply security showing itself to be most important? Base metals, rare earths, gold? Are they looking for short-term fixes or focusing on long-term security?

DK: All of the above. Every sector has its own challenges. It’s a difficult and a complex market right now. No one (with the exception of strategic long-term investors) is looking to long long-term greenfield investment projects. The ones that will get the best funding right now are more short-term opportunities that could get an immediate return or a greater return over the next few years.

TA: Some enterprises, including electronics companies or automobile manufacturing companies or even steel industry producers, have in the last several years made strategic investments in projects, properties and resources to ensure that they have a stable supply of various industrial minerals, including copper, iron ore, rare earths and the electronics metals, as a result of their need to ensure that they will have a steady supply.

TGR: If these alternative funding sources are looking for short-term needs rather than long-term payoffs, does that mean that the producers will recover faster than the explorers?

DK: I would say that that’s a true statement.

TA: What is of interest in the space today are brownfield expansion projects as opposed to the greenfield or exploration-oriented projects. Those projects that are adjacent to existing properties or operations and that are clearly identified as being low-cost are seeing money continued to be invested, but it is on a very selective basis.

TGR: Is that also true of gold and silver? Is there interest in precious metals exploration projects? And, if so, is there more interest in certain parts of the world?

TA: There is still interest in the precious metals sector as a store of wealth due in part to inflation concerns within the current monetary easing policy. But investment is going into jurisdictions with stable, secure political environments that are less subject to changes in rules and regulations to delay projects from advancing.

TGR: Previously, you listed the different alternative funding sources; did the conference cover streaming and royalty companies? Have they been a factor in keeping the lights on for mining companies?

TA: Yes, streaming, forward sales and alternative sources of capital were discussed along with private equity.

TGR: Crowd-sourcing is something new in the finance sector. Is it part of the mining sector or is it just talked about more than it is being done?

TA: My sense is that it’s too early in the mining and minerals space to say if it is actually having an impact. We are still largely dependent upon traditional sources, as well as the alternative sources, including forward sales, royalties, streaming, private equity and the sovereign wealth funds, as well as state-owned enterprises. Remember mining is a capital intensive sector.

TGR: On the royalty and streaming side, a number of new, smaller players doing small deals have joined the big royalty companies. Do you think that’s a sign of that market maturing? Will there be even more companies coming into the space or is there only so much room and we can look forward to consolidation in the royalty space?

DK: My sense is that there’s more interest in greater participation by a greater number of players in the royalty and streaming space because there’s opportunity and need for it. Where there’s opportunity and margins are still realizable, that’s where the capital is going. A lot of these are very one-off type of situations. But a few larger ones, including Royal Gold Inc. (RGLD:NASDAQ; RGL:TSX) and Silver Wheaton Corp. (SLW:TSX; SLW:NYSE), have been successful. They’re tapping an opportunity with their expertise, as well as the capital they have available. I think royalties and streaming are going to play a greater part down the road.

TGR: What about private equity? Is that becoming a more important source of funding?

TA: It is because certain informed, long-term or long-only investors perceive value in the space. The equity valuations in the mining and minerals space have become so depressed in the last year and certain private equity investors see an opportunity.

TGR: Are there things companies can accomplish with private equity that might be more difficult in the public market?

TA: Companies can tailor the relationship from the beginning between management and the private equity sponsor. The long-term support that comes with that relationship is also very important in an environment like this.

TGR: There has been quite a bit of debate about what’s going to happen to all the junior mining companies on the TSX. Some have said that as many as 500 companies listed on the Venture Exchange are going to go out of business in the next year. Will all these alternative sources of funding allow more companies to get through this difficult funding period?

DK: There will be some contraction, but I am hopeful and don’t think it will be on the massive scale you’ve just mentioned. People are very cautious right now. Companies seeking or in need of capital in the current environment will have to demonstrate that a project has possible returns in the next 2–3 years rather than 10–20 years out.

TA: Low-cost operations and production is paramount to attract investment. If a company can demonstrate high-grade quality of resources in the ground that can be produced at low costs within the first or second quartile of industry cost curves, those projects are better able to raise capital and find interest among the investment community.

TGR: Is that even more important with the institutional audience? Are institutions getting back into this market and, if so, what will it take to keep them there?

TA: The intermediate to long-term outlook—even the near-term outlook—for the mining sector is very favorable, but it needs to be carefully scrutinized and I don’t think the institutions have walked away. They are just sharpening their pencils like all investors today and making sure that they will see a return. The fundamental long-term story for raw materials, metals and minerals is intact on a macro basis worldwide. Growth in emerging markets—where demand for raw materials on a per capita or growth of GDP basis is greater than in the developed nations—is intact and likely will continue growing at above average rates.

DK: You started the conversation by asking whether these are the worst conditions the metals market has seen, and I would say they are not. It may not be as lucrative as it was two or three years ago. It’s more difficult now, but I don’t think it’s the worst we’ve seen. But it is changing and I think the investors and lenders are asking more questions. People are doing better due diligence, asking more questions—questions that probably should have been asked many years ago. Now that the need for a return is paramount, investors are asking more and better questions.

TGR: We have talked about a number of different funding trends. What answers do you hope attendees came away with from your conference?

DK: We featured about 50 speakers in 17 panels on topics ranging from lending and financing to political risk. The 145 people attending heard from leading experts from the banking, financial and technical advisory sectors, as well as accounting, legal, political risk and social and local economic development experts who all shared what they are seeing today and how they are managing opportunities for investing or financing in the global mining sector. Many attendees expressed thanks and walked away saying they learned from the experiences and observations of others. All of which has encouraged the SME to have this conference again next year.

TA: This was more than just an educational seminar—it was a chance for investors to get real answers from experts about what they are doing right now.

TGR: Thanks for your insights.

Tim Alch is a vice president and senior minerals business analyst at Behre Dolbear & Co. (USA) Inc. Alch is an international business, investment analyst and consultant with 25+ years of experience working within business units analyzing prospective, operating, management, strategy, technical, technology, valuation, transactions and investment issues for industrial and financial clients. He was a senior vice president of Anderson & Schwab Inc. and equity analyst at Dean Witter Reynolds, Prudential Securities, Paine Webber and senior consultant and industry analyst at World Steel Dynamics, Resource Strategies, Inc., CRU Inc. (London), covering global precious, base and industrial metals and minerals, mining, steel, coal, energy and related sectors. He is an honors graduate of Amherst College in geology and studied the economic and political impact of the Industrial Revolution and modern economy on the global mineral and energy resource Sectors. He continued his studies in the Master of Science mineral and energy economics program at Penn State. Alch has been on the Executive Committee of the New York Section of SME since 2008 and co-chaired the “Current Trends in Mining Finance—An Executive’s Guide: What Are Lenders, Investors Looking For?” conference.

Dave Kanagy is the executive director for the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, which is located in Englewood, Colorado; he joined SME in March 2004. Kanagy has worked over 29 years with nonprofit organizations. He has a Bachelor of Science degree in industrial education from the University of Maryland and a Master of Science degree in technology education from Eastern Illinois University. Kanagy is also a certified association executive by the American Society of Association Executives. He has also completed a six-year association management-development program from the University of Delaware’s Institute of Organizational Management.

Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.

DISCLOSURE:
1) JT Long conducted this interview for The Gold Report and provides services to The Gold Report as an employee. She or her family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of The Gold Report: Royal Gold Inc. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services or as sponsorship payment.
3) Tim Alch: I or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally am or my family is paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.
4) David Kanagy: I or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally am or my family is paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.
5) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent.
6) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. 
7) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.

 

Jim Rogers: Paramount Advice to All Investors

In the Investment World, Jim Rogers is remarkable. Unusually gifted. He is a legend. 
 
He first became recognized when his Quantum Fund averaged 420% a year over a 10 year period while the S&P 500 averaged just 5%. Rogers forecast the Commodity Boom and China Boom, and the well before they began. 
 
On May 2012 he remarked “there’s going to be a huge shift in American society, American culture, in the places where one is going to get rich. The stock brokers are going to be driving taxis. The smart ones will learn to drive tractors so they can work for the smart farmers who are going to be driving Lamborghinis.
 

JIM ROGERS: PARAMOUNT ADVICE TO ALL INVESTORS

 
 1. To avoid making mistakes in this and future investment markets keep an eye on the Federal Reserve and Washington. 
 
“Mr. Bernanke has no clue about economics or currencies, and no clue about how markets work. You have to be very careful and watch those guys. Many people for some reason have some kind of faith, even worship of the Central Bank, like they know what they are doing. Its has only been in the past few decades people even knew who Central Bankers were. Nobody knew about these guys 100 years, 80 years ago yet now they have become exalted and that is a bubble. 
 
Fortunately Central Bankers are going to pop and this particular crisis may well lead to it. In America we’ve had 3 Central Banks, the first two disappeared and this one will too in my view. They are making such horrible mistakes. “
 
 2. “The other thing to watch out for is please don’t follow the crowd. When everybody is doing something, especially these days, you have got to go the other way.”  Gold was up 12 years in a row. “I know of no asset in World History that has been up twelve years without a decline. So Gold has been acting very very strangely in the last twelve years and It had to go down for a while. Well it has.” 
 
“Be very very careful when something is accepted. This is age old advice but it is especially true in the markets today. Like the Japanese Yen right now, when over 90% are bearish then you have to go the other way.” Jim is long the Japanese Yen. He knows he may not be right but he knows he will have made an intelligent decision. 
 
3. “There is always Extraordinary Change Going On.” Rogers goes further and says that there has been no time in his life when there hasn’t been “Change Confusion & Complexity”.  
 
streetsmartsWriting is his book Street Smarts he makes the point that:
 
“You can take any year you want in history, then look at the world 15 years later and it is nothing, NOTHING,  like it was before”
 
As an example in 1930, 40, 50 we had Depression,  then War, followed by the beginning of suburban America. Just dramatic changes. “Nothing we know today, everything we think is true today is going to have changed 10, 15, 19 years from now. It always, always, always has been, and always will be.”

 
4.  “The world changed in the 1920’s, 30’s,as Capital moved from the UK to the US exacerbated by a financial crisis and mistakes made by the politicians. We have another change taking place in World History right now. This time Capital is moving from the largest Debtor Nations to the largest Creditor Nations in the world, which are China, Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, Japan. 
 
The assets are in Asia, you know who the debtors are. You just have to look out the window and you will see some of it.”
 
5. “This is the first time in recorded History when nearly every Major Central Bank is printing money trying to debase their currency.” Japan was first, the US second, then the British followed. We have a lot of money being printed around the world.
 
“If you ask me the US has been the major beneficiary because people are afraid of other currencies at the moment. I expect this to end very badly because throughout history when you have had artificial money printing it has ended very badly in the country that it has happened. But this time it is happening in the whole World!”
 
“Some people are having a lot of fun right now. If you give me a trillion dollars I will show you a very good time. But I don’t think it is going to last.”
 
I hope you are worried, you should be.”
 

ABOUT JIM ROGERS

In the Investment World, Rogers is remarkable. Unusually gifted. He is a legend. 
 
He first became recognized when his Quantum Fund averaged 420% a year over a 10 year period when the S&P 500 averaged just 5% a year. More recently Rogers forecasted the China Boom and the Commodity Boom well before they began. 
 
On May 2012 he remarked during an interview with Forbes Magazine that “there’s going to be a huge shift in American society, American culture, in the places where one is going to get rich. The stock brokers are going to be driving taxis. The smart ones will learn to drive tractors so they can work for the smart farmers. The farmers are going to be driving Lamborghinis.

 

test-php-789