Timing & trends

WEDNESDAY morning in London saw gold recover half of yesterday’s $50 plunge per ounce, rising back above $1300 as world stock markets slipped and the US government shutdown spread to new departments.

Commodities also recovered, and government bonds extended their gains, pushing US interest rates down to 2.62% on 10-year debt.

Euro investors saw gold recover less sharply, as the single currency jumped – and Italian bonds gained – after Rome’s coalition government won a vote of confidence against former prime minister and convicted criminal Silvio Berlusconi.

The European Central Bank today kept its main interest rate at 0.5%.

Rising from near two-month lows today, gold will move to $1405 per ounce by November next year, according to the average forecast from delegates at this week’s London Bullion Market Association conference in Rome, which ended Tuesday.

The best-attended LBMA annual conference to date, its final session saw 4 leading figures from the bullion market agree that $1050 per ounce is a “key level” for gold.

“Technically it’s a good floor,” said Marwan Shakarchi, chairman of refining group MKS Switzerland.

Prices at $1050 are also, he noted, where the Reserve Bank of India bought 200 tonnes of gold from the IMF in late 2009 – a move announced during the LBMA’s conference, then in Edinburgh.

“Believe me,” Shakarchi said, “the RBI technocrats will have analyzed every angle” before deciding to buy gold at that level “as insurance”.

“The RBI didn’t take that decision lightly,” agreed independent analyst Andy Smith. “And they really do know a thing or two about gold.”

“It’s a good call,” agreed Jeremy East of Standard Chartered Bank and Philip Klapwijk, formerly GFMS and now running boutique consultancy Precious Metals Insights. But prices need to reach that level, the panel also agreed, to “clear out weak longs” from gold investments before a new bull phase can begin.

“One reason for pessimism short-term,” said Klapwijk, “is that the surplus [of total supply over jewelry demand] remains high historically. Gold needs to fall further to narrow the gap.”

On his forecast, 2013 will see net gold investment worldwide fall dramatically from 2012 to $40 billion – “close to pre-financial crisis levels.”

Elsewhere today, the shutdown spread across US government departments spread as the $17 trillion debt-ceiling drew nearer.

“There are no other legal and prudent options to extend the nation’s borrowing authority,” said Treasury secretary Jack Lew on Tuesday, again urging lawmakers to end the shutdown and avoid a possible US default on its debt repayments and spending by raising the debt ceiling limit.

Speaking at the LBMA conference’s debate on gold Tuesday, “Detroit is not an outlier,” said Andy Smith.

Defaulting today on $600 million of debt due for repayment, “The city has only half the debt per head of the US national average,” Smith noted, comparing the devalued Dollar to the debasement of ancient Rome’s currency, the Denarius.

“Can you imagine what would happen if the Fed sold what it’s bought?” said Smith, noting the US Federal Reserve’s vote last week not to “taper” its current $85bn of government purchases each month.

As the Fed’s Treasury bond holdings come due, said Smith, “It will be called one arm of government forgiving another. But it will in fact be one giant step close to Weimar [hyperinflation].”

 

Adrian Ash

BullionVault

 

Gold price chart, no delay | Buy gold online

 

Adrian Ash is head of research at BullionVault, the secure, low-cost gold and silver market for private investors online, where you can fully allocated bullion already vaulted in your choice of London, New York, Singapore, Toronto or Zurich for just 0.5% commission.

 

(c) BullionVault 2013

 

Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.

The Skeptical Investor – October Update

Produced by McIver Wealth Management Consulting Group

Mark Jasayko, CFA,MBA, Portfolio Manager with McIver Wealth Management of Richardson GMP in Vancouver.

www.McIverWealth.com

The Shutdown and U.S. Housing

McIver Wealth Management Consulting Group / Richardson GMP Limited

The U.S. housing recovery that wasn’t?

There has been some noticeable chatter on the newswires this morning about how the U.S. federal government shutdown might affect the so called U.S. housing “recovery.” Much of it points to the fact that mortgage approvals may take longer to process. Apparently staff at the Federal Housing Administration has been reduced by 90% during the shutdown.

Just what kind of housing recovery is this? Is it so flimsy that delays in mortgage approvals might derail it? Granted, U.S. home prices are higher than at any other time since the real estate crash that occurred from 2006-2008. I suppose higher prices are a component of a recovery. But where is the robustness? Remember, the Fed has engaged in $3 trillion of money-printing with one of the major goals being to elevate housing prices. Despite all that, it is surprising to think that economists think that delays in mortgage approvals are a threat.

I remember the last U.S. federal government shutdown. Thinking back, I cannot remember anyone talking about how it might threaten the real estate market directly.   U.S. housing was pretty healthy then, recovering from the early 1990’s dip, and it was still a few years before the Barney Frank / Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac Circus that proclaimed “homes for everyone.” As a result, there was a solid foundation in terms of housing prices and not much froth yet. Housing back then was in a real recovery.

The recent rhetoric of the current “recovery” has suggested that it has been solid, that it is a beacon that will lead the U.S. economy out of its anemic growth trap, and that in some areas prices are “booming.” But what is all of that worth if it only takes a delay in mortgage approvals to get people worried?

 

The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Richardson GMP Limited or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. 

Richardson GMP Limited, Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund.

Richardson is a trade-mark of James Richardson & Sons, Limited. GMP is a registered trade-mark of GMP Securities L.P. Both used under license by Richardson GMP Limited.

A failure of leadership

Michael Mike Campbell image Michael found some statements made by a most powerful US Politician that help explain why US public is growing more cynical.

 

{mp3}mcbuscomoct2fp{/mp3}

Ground Control to Major Tom: Reserves Are in Jeopardy

When you hear about the “gold reserves” a mining company has in the ground, the natural assumption would be that they’re talking about a fixed number of ounces. After all, gold doesn’t decay, and neither does it grow legs and move someplace else.

But assumptions are dangerous. In fact, industry-wide, reserves are likely to fall fairly significantly in the near future.

When the gold price falls, it doesn’t just have a short-term impact on producers—slashed earnings and forced write-downs—it can affect the number of economically mineable ounces a company carries on its books, or even what it can mine in the future.

The Bar Is Higher

Reserves are determined by a combination of factors: mostly cutoff grades, metals price assumptions, and projected production costs.

For example, based on a gold price of $1,500 per ounce, a project may have economic ore at a cutoff grade of 1 gram per tonne (g/t).

But with gold selling in the low $1,300s, that same deposit may now require a higher cutoff grade, say 1.5 g/t, because the revenue earned from mining ore at the previous cutoff would be lower than the cost to extract it—a strategy that, as we all know, doesn’t make a great business plan.

What Was Once “Ore” Is Now Just Dirt

Higher cutoff grades reduce the number of economic ounces available for mining, especially if the gold price doesn’t recover for a period of time.

Here’s the average gold price over the past four quarters:

Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 7.18.31 AM

As you can see, that’s a fairly significant drop, and it has undoubtedly forced many company executives to revisit the price assumptions that were used to determine reserves. That means many reserves requiring a gold price of $1,350/oz or higher are likely to come off the books.

This is the reason high-grade projects have better odds of survival than low-grade ones. Sure, all projects make less money when gold falls, but the higher-grade ones tend to have higher margins and see fewer slowdowns or shutdowns. In many cases, they still make great profits.

High Grading

However, there’s another phenomenon at work that will conspire to lower reserves: high grading.

Many projects have both low-grade and high-grade zones. When prices fall, a company can mine the richer ore and still make money. It may sound shortsighted, but it can be the right thing to do to stay profitable and be able to survive and advance in a temporarily weak price environment. But it does impact reserves, maybe more than you realize…

When metals prices are low and companies focus on high-grade ore, the low-grade material is temporarily bypassed. It’s still physically there, but not only is it not economic at lower metals prices, it may never get mined at all.

That’s because some low-grade ore only “works” when it’s mixed with high-grade ore. Even when gold moves back up to the price that the low-grade ore needed to be economic when mixed with the higher-grade ore, it doesn’t matter, because the high-grade ore is gone. So it’s not just gone legally, as per regulatory definitions of mining reserves, it may be economically gone for good.

Miners could return to some of these zones in a very high gold price environment (something north of $2,000), but that’s a concern for another day. The point for now is that many of today’s low-grade zones can no longer be counted as reserves.

Now You See Them, Now You Don’t

Most companies update their reserves at year-end and report revisions in the first quarter. If gold doesn’t stage a strong rebound soon, the industry will see a significant reduction in mineable reserves.

This will have repercussions on the precious metals sector, and on us as investors. As you might suspect, some of it is negative, but it also points to an investment opportunity that we believe will make us a lot of money.

Here’s what Major Tom radios in about lower reserves and what that means to us investors…

  • A corresponding decrease in the value of the company. A company with less product to sell won’t be priced as high as it was previously. The exception here will be the producers that can maintain strong cash flow; those that do will be the ones that hold up the best.
  • Watch out for companies that take a big write-down in reserves. Many producers will be forced to report lower reserves in early 2014 if gold prices stay where they are. But the Big Red Flags will be those with unusually large drops, because they may not have the reserves to keep production at the same level. These will mainly be the companies with low-margin projects, or those with low-grade material that will remain uneconomic because of high grading. If production falls, the stock will woo fewer investors.
  • Lower reserves = lower supply = higher gold prices. Worldwide gold production is basically flat. If we see a substantial decrease in the number of ounces coming to market as a result of the fallout from reserve write-downs and demand stays at least where it is, prices will be forced up. This is already happening, but if it picks up steam, we could see a fire lit under gold prices.
  • The better junior exploration companies could be big winners. Many producers, out of necessity, have reduced or even cut exploration budgets. Yet if they’re going to survive, sooner or later they’ll have to find more ounces. Every day a miner operates, his business gets smaller—but if he hasn’t been exploring, the ounces won’t be there when he needs them.

Enter the junior exploration company with a big, high-grade deposit. These companies will become juicy takeover targets, especially if their projects have strong economics at lower gold prices. Once management teams realize they’re running low on ore, there will be a mad scramble for this type of asset.

Even when gold prices return to prior highs, it will take years for large companies that have cut exploration expenses to bring back all the laid-off geologists, identify and drill new deposits, and develop those that are economic.

There will only be one solution, and it will be a pressing one: buy an asset.

That’s why right now is the best time to buy those juniors that have robust projects with strong economics. And I just bought one…

Casey Chief Metals Strategist Louis James recommended an advanced-stage gold exploration play in the current issue of the Casey International Speculator. The company has a large, high-grade deposit in Europe that looks poised to become much larger.

I plan to buy the best undervalued juniors now and be patient until the producers come a-calling. A monstrous run-up is coming in the junior sector, and all you have to do to profit is wait for the inevitable to arrive.

Reserves are going lower, yes, but we’ll be making some money. If you want in on the action, click here to start your risk-free 3-month trial of the International Speculator.