Timing & trends

The Skeptical Investor – October Update

Produced by McIver Wealth Management Consulting Group

Mark Jasayko, CFA,MBA, Portfolio Manager with McIver Wealth Management of Richardson GMP in Vancouver.

www.McIverWealth.com

The Shutdown and U.S. Housing

McIver Wealth Management Consulting Group / Richardson GMP Limited

The U.S. housing recovery that wasn’t?

There has been some noticeable chatter on the newswires this morning about how the U.S. federal government shutdown might affect the so called U.S. housing “recovery.” Much of it points to the fact that mortgage approvals may take longer to process. Apparently staff at the Federal Housing Administration has been reduced by 90% during the shutdown.

Just what kind of housing recovery is this? Is it so flimsy that delays in mortgage approvals might derail it? Granted, U.S. home prices are higher than at any other time since the real estate crash that occurred from 2006-2008. I suppose higher prices are a component of a recovery. But where is the robustness? Remember, the Fed has engaged in $3 trillion of money-printing with one of the major goals being to elevate housing prices. Despite all that, it is surprising to think that economists think that delays in mortgage approvals are a threat.

I remember the last U.S. federal government shutdown. Thinking back, I cannot remember anyone talking about how it might threaten the real estate market directly.   U.S. housing was pretty healthy then, recovering from the early 1990’s dip, and it was still a few years before the Barney Frank / Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac Circus that proclaimed “homes for everyone.” As a result, there was a solid foundation in terms of housing prices and not much froth yet. Housing back then was in a real recovery.

The recent rhetoric of the current “recovery” has suggested that it has been solid, that it is a beacon that will lead the U.S. economy out of its anemic growth trap, and that in some areas prices are “booming.” But what is all of that worth if it only takes a delay in mortgage approvals to get people worried?

 

The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Richardson GMP Limited or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. 

Richardson GMP Limited, Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund.

Richardson is a trade-mark of James Richardson & Sons, Limited. GMP is a registered trade-mark of GMP Securities L.P. Both used under license by Richardson GMP Limited.

A failure of leadership

Michael Mike Campbell image Michael found some statements made by a most powerful US Politician that help explain why US public is growing more cynical.

 

{mp3}mcbuscomoct2fp{/mp3}

Ground Control to Major Tom: Reserves Are in Jeopardy

When you hear about the “gold reserves” a mining company has in the ground, the natural assumption would be that they’re talking about a fixed number of ounces. After all, gold doesn’t decay, and neither does it grow legs and move someplace else.

But assumptions are dangerous. In fact, industry-wide, reserves are likely to fall fairly significantly in the near future.

When the gold price falls, it doesn’t just have a short-term impact on producers—slashed earnings and forced write-downs—it can affect the number of economically mineable ounces a company carries on its books, or even what it can mine in the future.

The Bar Is Higher

Reserves are determined by a combination of factors: mostly cutoff grades, metals price assumptions, and projected production costs.

For example, based on a gold price of $1,500 per ounce, a project may have economic ore at a cutoff grade of 1 gram per tonne (g/t).

But with gold selling in the low $1,300s, that same deposit may now require a higher cutoff grade, say 1.5 g/t, because the revenue earned from mining ore at the previous cutoff would be lower than the cost to extract it—a strategy that, as we all know, doesn’t make a great business plan.

What Was Once “Ore” Is Now Just Dirt

Higher cutoff grades reduce the number of economic ounces available for mining, especially if the gold price doesn’t recover for a period of time.

Here’s the average gold price over the past four quarters:

Screen Shot 2013-10-02 at 7.18.31 AM

As you can see, that’s a fairly significant drop, and it has undoubtedly forced many company executives to revisit the price assumptions that were used to determine reserves. That means many reserves requiring a gold price of $1,350/oz or higher are likely to come off the books.

This is the reason high-grade projects have better odds of survival than low-grade ones. Sure, all projects make less money when gold falls, but the higher-grade ones tend to have higher margins and see fewer slowdowns or shutdowns. In many cases, they still make great profits.

High Grading

However, there’s another phenomenon at work that will conspire to lower reserves: high grading.

Many projects have both low-grade and high-grade zones. When prices fall, a company can mine the richer ore and still make money. It may sound shortsighted, but it can be the right thing to do to stay profitable and be able to survive and advance in a temporarily weak price environment. But it does impact reserves, maybe more than you realize…

When metals prices are low and companies focus on high-grade ore, the low-grade material is temporarily bypassed. It’s still physically there, but not only is it not economic at lower metals prices, it may never get mined at all.

That’s because some low-grade ore only “works” when it’s mixed with high-grade ore. Even when gold moves back up to the price that the low-grade ore needed to be economic when mixed with the higher-grade ore, it doesn’t matter, because the high-grade ore is gone. So it’s not just gone legally, as per regulatory definitions of mining reserves, it may be economically gone for good.

Miners could return to some of these zones in a very high gold price environment (something north of $2,000), but that’s a concern for another day. The point for now is that many of today’s low-grade zones can no longer be counted as reserves.

Now You See Them, Now You Don’t

Most companies update their reserves at year-end and report revisions in the first quarter. If gold doesn’t stage a strong rebound soon, the industry will see a significant reduction in mineable reserves.

This will have repercussions on the precious metals sector, and on us as investors. As you might suspect, some of it is negative, but it also points to an investment opportunity that we believe will make us a lot of money.

Here’s what Major Tom radios in about lower reserves and what that means to us investors…

  • A corresponding decrease in the value of the company. A company with less product to sell won’t be priced as high as it was previously. The exception here will be the producers that can maintain strong cash flow; those that do will be the ones that hold up the best.
  • Watch out for companies that take a big write-down in reserves. Many producers will be forced to report lower reserves in early 2014 if gold prices stay where they are. But the Big Red Flags will be those with unusually large drops, because they may not have the reserves to keep production at the same level. These will mainly be the companies with low-margin projects, or those with low-grade material that will remain uneconomic because of high grading. If production falls, the stock will woo fewer investors.
  • Lower reserves = lower supply = higher gold prices. Worldwide gold production is basically flat. If we see a substantial decrease in the number of ounces coming to market as a result of the fallout from reserve write-downs and demand stays at least where it is, prices will be forced up. This is already happening, but if it picks up steam, we could see a fire lit under gold prices.
  • The better junior exploration companies could be big winners. Many producers, out of necessity, have reduced or even cut exploration budgets. Yet if they’re going to survive, sooner or later they’ll have to find more ounces. Every day a miner operates, his business gets smaller—but if he hasn’t been exploring, the ounces won’t be there when he needs them.

Enter the junior exploration company with a big, high-grade deposit. These companies will become juicy takeover targets, especially if their projects have strong economics at lower gold prices. Once management teams realize they’re running low on ore, there will be a mad scramble for this type of asset.

Even when gold prices return to prior highs, it will take years for large companies that have cut exploration expenses to bring back all the laid-off geologists, identify and drill new deposits, and develop those that are economic.

There will only be one solution, and it will be a pressing one: buy an asset.

That’s why right now is the best time to buy those juniors that have robust projects with strong economics. And I just bought one…

Casey Chief Metals Strategist Louis James recommended an advanced-stage gold exploration play in the current issue of the Casey International Speculator. The company has a large, high-grade deposit in Europe that looks poised to become much larger.

I plan to buy the best undervalued juniors now and be patient until the producers come a-calling. A monstrous run-up is coming in the junior sector, and all you have to do to profit is wait for the inevitable to arrive.

Reserves are going lower, yes, but we’ll be making some money. If you want in on the action, click here to start your risk-free 3-month trial of the International Speculator.

Clues from the Past: Market Valuation, Inflation & Treasury Yields

My monthly market valuation updates have long had the same conclusion: US stock indexes are significantly overvalued, which suggests cautious expectations on investment returns. In a “normal” market environment — one with normal business cycles, Federal Reserve policy, interest rates and inflation — current valuation levels would be a serious concern.

But these are different times. The economic cycle shaped by the Financial Crisis that began emerging in 2007 shortly after the Bear Stearns hedge funds collapsed. The Fed began its historic crusade in cutting the overnight rate from an average of 5.25% prior to the hedge fund collapse to ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) as of December 16, 2008. The bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008 was the most dramatic precipitator of the Fed’s unprecedented policies.

Note from dshort: I’ve update the charts in this commentary to include the latest monthly data.

FFR-daily-since-2007

….3 more charts & commentary HERE

test-php-789