Timing & trends
Produced by McIver Wealth Management Consulting Group
Mark Jasayko, CFA,MBA, Portfolio Manager with McIver Wealth Management of Richardson GMP in Vancouver.
The U.S. housing recovery that wasn’t?
There has been some noticeable chatter on the newswires this morning about how the U.S. federal government shutdown might affect the so called U.S. housing “recovery.” Much of it points to the fact that mortgage approvals may take longer to process. Apparently staff at the Federal Housing Administration has been reduced by 90% during the shutdown.
Just what kind of housing recovery is this? Is it so flimsy that delays in mortgage approvals might derail it? Granted, U.S. home prices are higher than at any other time since the real estate crash that occurred from 2006-2008. I suppose higher prices are a component of a recovery. But where is the robustness? Remember, the Fed has engaged in $3 trillion of money-printing with one of the major goals being to elevate housing prices. Despite all that, it is surprising to think that economists think that delays in mortgage approvals are a threat.
I remember the last U.S. federal government shutdown. Thinking back, I cannot remember anyone talking about how it might threaten the real estate market directly. U.S. housing was pretty healthy then, recovering from the early 1990’s dip, and it was still a few years before the Barney Frank / Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac Circus that proclaimed “homes for everyone.” As a result, there was a solid foundation in terms of housing prices and not much froth yet. Housing back then was in a real recovery.
The recent rhetoric of the current “recovery” has suggested that it has been solid, that it is a beacon that will lead the U.S. economy out of its anemic growth trap, and that in some areas prices are “booming.” But what is all of that worth if it only takes a delay in mortgage approvals to get people worried?
The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Richardson GMP Limited or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Richardson GMP Limited, Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund.
Richardson is a trade-mark of James Richardson & Sons, Limited. GMP is a registered trade-mark of GMP Securities L.P. Both used under license by Richardson GMP Limited.
Michael found some statements made by a most powerful US Politician that help explain why US public is growing more cynical.
My monthly market valuation updates have long had the same conclusion: US stock indexes are significantly overvalued, which suggests cautious expectations on investment returns. In a “normal” market environment — one with normal business cycles, Federal Reserve policy, interest rates and inflation — current valuation levels would be a serious concern.
But these are different times. The economic cycle shaped by the Financial Crisis that began emerging in 2007 shortly after the Bear Stearns hedge funds collapsed. The Fed began its historic crusade in cutting the overnight rate from an average of 5.25% prior to the hedge fund collapse to ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) as of December 16, 2008. The bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008 was the most dramatic precipitator of the Fed’s unprecedented policies.
Note from dshort: I’ve update the charts in this commentary to include the latest monthly data.

….3 more charts & commentary HERE





