Timing & trends

REASON #1: AN ENDING EXPANDING DIAGONAL IN THE DOW

“The long term versus the short term argument is one used by losers.”

                                  -Larry Adler 

 

There is a lifecycle of a trend. And breaking it down into five stages might look something like this:

Stage 1: Accumulation
Stage 2: Denial
Stage 3: Conviction
Stage 4: Doubt
Stage 5: Overshoot

Using the S&P 500, I think we may be nearing Stage 4: Doubt …

But is there anything else to suggest Stage 3: Conviction is coming to an end?

Yes. I would argue there is a litany of reasons.

112213 SP 500 lifecycle of a trend

A trend’s lifecycle certinly doesn’t have to break down into five nice, neat stages. But based on what we’ve seen from this trend since 2009, it appears as though we’re nearing the start of Stage 4: Doubt. (I’ve drawn in an alternate scenario in red that suggests what coming action would look like if we’re actually already in Stage 5: Overshoot. But that doesn’t appear as likely at this point.)

But is there anything else to suggest Stage 3: Conviction is coming to an end?

Yes. I would argue there is a litany of reasons. In fact, we’re preparing this long list of reasons for members of our Global Investor trading newsletter. And it will be published later today. If you’re interested in staying plugged in to what’s driving markets, and if you’re interested in explicit ETF trading ideas, then I suggest you snag yourself an early Christmas present.

Anyway, the reasons span from deflation in Europe to contrarian signals in key sentiment guages. But because I’m a nice guy, I’ll give you reason #1 right now …

Reason #1: An ENDING expanding diagonal showing up on Dow Industrials

The trend described above is going on five years running. And as I said, the lifecycle of a trend doesn’t always breakdown into five tidy stages. So let’s zoom in a bit for confirmation that the technical setup may be turning bearish for US equity averages.

I point you to the Dow Industrials:

112213 Dow expanding diagonal

A review of Elliott Wave Principle by Frost & Prechter reminded me of diagonals, particularly ending expanding diagonals. That’s what I’ve drawn in on the chart above. It suggests the Dow has exhausted its upside and is due for a significant retracement.

That’s all for now.

If you want the rest of the reasons we’re nearing Stage 4: Doubt, then I encourage you to have your mind blown with a Global Investor subscription. [And don’t forget:ClearPoint can easily and efficiently execute any of our trading newsletters.]

Have a great weekend.

-JR Crooks

 

 

Explaining Bitcoin to a 94 Year Old

gold-70-80How I Explained Bitcoin to My 94-Year-Old Mother

The Dow fell yesterday. Gold too.

But at least Tim Geithner has found a job. Now, he can give up the food stamps… and get off the unemployment rolls. The cronies are taking back one of their own. He’s back on Wall Street – at private equity firm Warburg Pincus. 

“When they approached me, they clearly wanted me to play a substantial role in running the company,” Geithner told the Wall Street Journal

What does Geithner know about private equity? 

Nothing. But sometimes WHO you know is more important than WHAT you know. 

It won’t hurt Warburg Pincus that its new managing director knows his way around Washington. And it didn’t hurt the suits on Wall Street, when the bad debt hit the fan in 2008, that they had their man Tim in the Department of the Treasury. 

The record shows that Goldman Sachs boss Lloyd Blankfein got on the phone with Geithner no fewer than 18 times in one 24-hour period. 

Apparently, those were calls worth making. Geithner came to the Street’s aid almost overnight – with $700 billion in TARP funds plus federal guarantees worth, according to the former Inspector General of the TARP, $21 trillion. 

Where does a government that is already running deeply in the red… and whose elected representatives are dead set against raising taxes… get that kind of money? 

Ah, dear reader, where have you been? 

We live in new era of experimental money. The supply of cash and credit can be expanded easily and almost infinitely – making it possible for the feds to do this kind of thing.

A New Monetary Experiment

But here’s the really remarkable story: The experimental money of the 1971-2013 period is now threatened by another monetary experiment. 

We explained it to our 94-year-old mother:

“What is bitcoin?” she asked.

“It’s a new virtual currency. You know, it was created by some computer whiz. You can use it to buy things.” 

“Who was this whiz?” 

“Nobody knows. He is said to have been a Japanese programmer… or group of programmers.” 

“Do you have a bitcoin? Could I see it?” 

“No, it only exists in cyberspace.” 

“Where does it come from?” 

“You have to find it in cyberspace, using computers plugged into the Internet.” 

“Oh. Well, I guess everyone with a computer is looking for them. How much is the new money worth?” 

“It depends. It trades freely in cyberspace.” 

“But what makes it valuable?” 

“Nothing… except that people are using it. And its supply is limited. We’re going to begin using it in our business.” 

“But why would a merchant trade his valuable merchandise for something that has no value?” 

“Well… that’s what we do with the dollar.” 

“But the government guarantees the value of the dollar. They may not always do a good job of it. But at least they stand behind it. Who’s guaranteeing the value of the bitcoin?” 

“Nobody. It’s just the way the system has been set up. But remember, the supply of bitcoins is limited, unlike the supply of dollars or euro or yen.” 

“You mean… nobody knows where it came from. Nobody has ever seen it. Nobody knows what it is worth. Nobody knows where to find it. And nobody stands behind it. Seems crazy to me.” 

A Silly Fantasy of Techie Dreamers?

Yes, dear reader, amazing things are beginning to happen. 

When bitcoin first came along we didn’t know what to make of it. We dismissed it as a silly fantasy perpetrated by techie dreamers. 

Money you can’t see? Money you can’t hold in your hand or put in your safe? Money with no precious metal backing… that no one stands behind? It sounded crazy.

At least the paper US dollar has the full faith and credit of the United States of America backing it – for whatever that’s worth. 

The euro has the ECB, Brussels and Berlin (more or less) behind it. 

Sterling has the Bank of England, the British parliament and the crown.

What has bitcoin got? Nothing.

And yet, what currency has outperformed all others? 

Bitcoin!

Hmmm….what to make of it? 

We don’t know. Our friend Max Keiser tweets: “Bill Bonner is bullish on bitcoin.” 

But we’re not bullish on the new money… we’re buggish. We like bitcoin like we like gold. Only less. 

Will it go up in price? We don’t know. 

But what we like about bitcoin is the same thing the feds don’t like about it. They can’t control it. So, they can’t use it to steal from people. And they can’t use it to bail out their friends… support zombies… or finance pointless wars. 

Nor can they use bitcoin to cover their deficits or to manipulate the economy. 

But wait… 

Why can’t the feds put their enormous computing power to work mining for bitcoin? That way, if bitcoin becomes the coin of the realm, they could still control it… with a huge reserve of their own.

Are they too busy spying on people? 

Are they too thick to see the potential?

Are we missing something?

Hit “reply” to this email to send your thoughts….

Regards,

Bill

 

Perhaps the Only Chart that Matters

fed-assets-qe-market-2007

There are a lot of different indicators and studies that technical analysts use, and all of those tools came into usage due to some degree of merit. But the one factor which seems to be trumping everything else lately is what the Fed is doing with its QEternity program, which shows no sign of stopping anytime soon, or maybe ever. 

This week’s chart compares the SP500 to the total assets held by the Fed. That plot is made up from the total of the Fed’s Treasury holdings and its mortgage backed securities (MBS), which are sometimes referred to as “agency” debt products. The agencies which that title refers to are Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc. 

Putting the chart together this way helps us see just how important the Fed’s purchases have been to the task of sustaining the bull market for stocks. Whenever the Fed has decided to change the slope of the green line, the slope of the SP500 has also changed in a dramatic way. That makes it such an important question to contemplate a “tapering” off in the rate of growth of Fed assets, or even an outright end to quantitative easing (QE).

This chart also helps us see just how critical the Fed’s actions were in bringing about the awful bear market of 2007-09. Back then, the Fed just held Treasuries, and it did not start buying agency debt until January 2009. The Fed’s holdings of Treasury debt peaked in August 2007 at $790 billion, and over the next 17 months the Fed sold off more than $300 billion of those holdings. That’s right, in the middle of the worst liquidity crisis in decades, with banks folding and with Congress handing out tax rebates, the Fed was pulling liquidity OUT of the banking system. 

fed-assets-qe-stock-market

There are a lot of different indicators and studies that technical analysts use, and all of those tools came into usage due to some degree of merit. But the one factor which seems to be trumping everything else lately is what the Fed is doing with its QEternity program, which shows no sign of stopping anytime soon, or maybe ever. 

This week’s chart compares the SP500 to the total assets held by the Fed. That plot is made up from the total of the Fed’s Treasury holdings and its mortgage backed securities (MBS), which are sometimes referred to as “agency” debt products. The agencies which that title refers to are Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc. 

Putting the chart together this way helps us see just how important the Fed’s purchases have been to the task of sustaining the bull market for stocks. Whenever the Fed has decided to change the slope of the green line, the slope of the SP500 has also changed in a dramatic way. That makes it such an important question to contemplate a “tapering” off in the rate of growth of Fed assets, or even an outright end to quantitative easing (QE).

This chart also helps us see just how critical the Fed’s actions were in bringing about the awful bear market of 2007-09. Back then, the Fed just held Treasuries, and it did not start buying agency debt until January 2009. The Fed’s holdings of Treasury debt peaked in August 2007 at $790 billion, and over the next 17 months the Fed sold off more than $300 billion of those holdings. That’s right, in the middle of the worst liquidity crisis in decades, with banks folding and with Congress handing out tax rebates, the Fed was pulling liquidity OUT of the banking system. 

CLICK HERE to subscribe to the free weekly Best of Financial Sense Newsletter .

* Philly Fed index drop soothes taper fears

* Drop in new jobless claims linked to holiday

* October Producer Price Index down 0.2 percent

By Luciana Lopez

NEW YORK, Nov 21 (Reuters) – Prices for U.S. Treasuries rose slightly on Thursday as investors weighed the likelihood of a pullback in stimulus by the Federal Reserve, even as economic data and Fed speakers sent mixed signals.

While jobless claims suggested the jobs market could be finding firmer ground, factory activity in the U.S. mid-Atlantic region slowed in November.

“The Philly Fed (manufacturing) number offset the decent claims data,” said Kim Rupert, managing director of fixed-income analysis at Action Economics in San Francisco.

The lack of a strong trend in economic data has left investors stymied, she said.

“It’s still very much a range trade until we can find some more definitive news that will give us more direction,” Rupert added.

Investors are trying to gauge when the Fed might pull back on its $85 billion per month in buying of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities.

After policymakers, including Chairman Ben Bernanke, began hinting at an exit in May, yields on benchmark 10-year notes shot up more than 100 basis points over several months. But backpedaling by policymakers, as well as a slew of mixed data, have since given investors pause.

Even Federal Reserve speakers on Thursday did little to clarify the direction of policy.

St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard, for example, said that accommodative bond-buying must continue for now despite possible inflation risks, in part because there are no signs of price rises so far.

But Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker said price gains were likely to accelerate.

Lacker is not a voting member this year on the Federal Open Market Committee, though he said he remains opposed to the Fed’s current policy of buying $85 billion in bonds every month to try to stimulate the economy.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury note rose 1/32 in price to yield 2.788 percent on Thursday, compared to 2.791 percent late on Wednesday.

The 30-year bond rose 7/32 in price to yield 3.892 percent on Thursday, compared to 3.905 percent late on Wednesday.

Analysts said investors oversold Treasuries in the previous session after meeting minutes added to expectations that the Fed will hold interest rates at record lows for several years.

“The Philly Fed was quite weak but the market was dramatically oversold,” said Thomas di Galoma, co-head of fixed income rates at ED&F Man Capital in New York.

The U.S. Treasury also sold $13 billion of 10-year TIPS, or inflation protected securities, on Thursday at a high yield of 0.560 percent.

“This is the highest yielding 10-year TIPS auction since July 2011,” noted Thomas Simons, a money market economist with Jefferies & Co in New York.

For October, U.S. consumer spending was up more than expected while inflation remained flat. Consumer price for the last month showed a decline, which was largely unexpected; however, it will provide some room to Federal Reserve to continue with its current pace of bond purchases. Rise in consumer spending across a range of consumer good signals positive momentum for the U.S. economy in the fourth quarter.

Consumer spending may limit downside risk

According to the data from the Commerce Department, for October, retail sales or core sales excluding automobiles, gasoline and building materials was up 0.5% versus 0.3% in September. Retail sales, which most closely reflect consumer spending, were expected to rise 0.3% by the economists polled by Reuters.

Better numbers of core retail sales indicate that the consumer spending, which touched a two year low in the third quarter, may limit the downside risk to the economy growth, in the coming quarters.

A senior analyst at Moody’s Analytics told Reuters “Overall this suggests the consumers are supporting the current recovery.”

Housing market slowing

On one hand, where consumer spending is showing hopes of better growth, the housing market, which has been driving economic growth, showed signs of slowing down.

As per the data from the National Association of Realtors, sales of existing homes were down 3.2% in October while the median price of the previously owned home increased 12.8% from last year. Rising home values and increasing stock market prices are providing support to the consumer spending.

Inflation may worry officials

In a separate report, from the Labor Department, the Consumer Price Index was down 0.1% owing to a sharp decline in gasoline prices. For September, the index was up 0.2%.

CPI, for a period of twelve months ending October, was up 1%, which is the smallest gain since October 2009. Economist expected the consumer prices to be unchanged for September. Excluding energy and food component, core CPI was up only 0.1%, for the third time in a row.

Core CPI, for the past 12 months, increased 1.7%, which is similar to the last months rise. Low inflation indicates that the Fed may carry on with its monthly $85 billion bond buying program for few more months.

Millan Mulraine, senior economist at TD Securities in New York told Reuters “”The inflation backdrop continues to be supportive to the Fed’s ultra-accommodative policy stance.”

test-php-789