Bonds & Interest Rates

 U.S. debt ceiling resolution weighs, helps boost yields … full article

In this interview, Rickards notes that gold is technically set up for a massive rally; he has a three- to five-year price target of between $7,000 and $9,000 per ounce. This prediction is based on a collapse of confidence in the dollar and other forms of paper currency.

Rickards discusses what a rising gold prices means for gold investors and where physical gold is going. As for whether gold will rally: “There is a total supply of gold in the world. But to corner a market or squeeze a market, you don’t need to buy all the gold, you just need to buy the floating supply. Think of all the gold in the world, it’s about 170,000 tons. Think of a little sliver on top of it that is the floating supply available for trading.”

“Gold that’s in the Comex or JPMorgan or GLD vaults is available for trading. Gold purchased by the Chinese will not see the light of day again for the next 300 years, and is not available for trading. So with the gold going from West to East, and from GLD to China, the total amount of gold is unchanged, but the floating supply is declining rapidly.”

“This means that the paper gold that sits on top of the floating supply is becoming more and more unstable and vulnerable to a short squeeze, because there is not enough physical gold to support it. So that’s likely to collapse at one point and lead to a short squeeze and heavy buying.”

Click to read full article

also – click to read the whole Bullion Buzz Newsletter

The Opportunity In This Metal Is Obvious

imagesEvery investor talks about how commodities are cyclical. But few take advantage of this fact.

It’s certainly true that throughout history most commodities have swung from boom to bust. Which means that buying busts has been a reliable strategy for profits.

And judging from news last week, we’re certainly in a bust for one metal: uranium.

Reports emerged of another high-profile mine shutdown in the sector. With junior producer Paladin Energy announcing it will suspend output from its Kayelekera mine in Malawi.

The firm noted that the rationale for the closure is simple. The mine simply wasn’t making any profit at today’s low uranium prices. Even after a slew of cost-cutting measures were implemented over the past several months.

The overall loss of output from Kayelekera is small. At around 0.5 to 0.7 million pounds of U3O8 yearly. But the closure is yet another sign of how badly the uranium business is hurting at current prices.

This follows on a string of other announced project delays and shutdowns in the sector. With even top-producing nation Kazakhstan saying it will delay any new mining projects, because the financial returns simply aren’t there in today’s environment.

It’s simple logic that when these sorts of closures start to happen–as prices languish at multi-year lows–it’s a good sign that an industry is correcting itself. With production losses beginning to cure low prices, and set the stage for a rebound.

It won’t happen overnight. But these sorts of events are glaring indicators that the market probably isn’t going much lower from here. Making this a lower-risk time to buy good companies and projects, in preparation for the recovery.

Years out, we’ll look back on this time and say, “It was obvious things had to get better.” We’ll see who actually puts that insight into action, and turns a profit on this down market.

Here’s to buying the bust,

Dave Forest

dforest@piercepoints.com / @piercepoints / Facebook

The House on Tuesday approved a bill to extend the federal government’s borrowing authority with no strings attached, after Republican leaders dropped all policy demands to avoid a market-rattling confrontation in an election year. – full article HERE

Bitcoin is being hit by attacks from unknown computer hackers who are sending “mutated” lines of code into the program that runs the virtual currency, a spokeswoman from its main trade organization said in a statement.
 
“This is a denial-of-service attack,” said the spokeswoman, Jinyoung Lee Englund. “Whoever is doing this is not stealing coins, but is succeeding in preventing some transactions from confirming. It’s important to note that DoS attacks do not affect people’s bitcoin wallets or funds.”  Full Article

test-php-789