Asset protection
One of my old rules of trading is that whenever a major asset class, index, or other benchmark has a sudden, rapid move in price, something blows up. Sky high. (related by John Mauldin – How the Rising Dollar Could Trigger the Next Global Financial Crisis – Editor Money Talks)
That’s because people get used to regimes. They get used to a certain state of affairs with a lack of volatility. They become complacent. Maybe they stop hedging. Maybe they allow themselves to have unbounded downside risk. Maybe they start gambling.
In the last month, we’ve seen massive moves in the dollar and oil—and I assure you, someone is going to get hurt.
So far I haven’t said anything controversial. Energy companies are going to get hurt by lower oil prices. Exporters are going to get hurt by a rising dollar. A chimpanzee could figure this out.
But there are second-order effects. People are starting to figure out that Canadian banks are going to get hurt by the lack of investment banking business from the energy sector, and the stocks are getting punished.
And there are third-order effects too, which people will soon discover.
If you sit around and think hard enough, you can make these sorts of connections. Some people are very good at this. A commodity price moves fast, and they can figure out the point of maximum pain for some company far down the supply chain from the actual commodity.
I’m not that smart. But I’m smart enough to get out of the way when something big and important like oil moves 40%.
Let’s step into our time machine and set the dial to 1994. That was the year when interest rates backed up a couple of percentage points. Remember the bond market vigilantes? They were pricing in Hillarycare and a Democratic Party wish list, and they caned the bond market until interest rates were making borrowers squeal.
But what was interesting about 1994 was that in the grand scheme of things, interest rates didn’t go up all that much. Just a couple of percentage points. Now, if I asked you who you thought would get hurt by rising rates, you might say banks, hedge funds. And you would be wrong. Who got hurt by rising interest rates?
Procter & Gamble.
Orange County, CA.
Mexico.
Why did the first two blow up? Derivatives.
By the way, I’m not referring to derivatives pejoratively. I’ve spent most of my adult life trading them. They’re not financial weapons of mass destruction. What they do is take risk over here and move it over there. So if bank XYZ was negatively exposed to higher interest rates, they were able to offset that exposure to Orange County through derivatives.
Of course, the derivatives Orange County was trading were very exotic and clearly unsuitable for a municipality, but that’s a discussion for another time over a burger and a beer. The point is that rates moved, and they moved fast, and stuff blew up.
But not the stuff you thought would blow up.
Buying Volatility on the Cheap
So I know what you’re going to ask me next: What’s going to blow up?
Who knows? By definition, you can’t know, especially when the risk has been laid off through derivatives.
But this is how it works: Oil moves 40%, the dollar moves 10-15%, and someone’s out of business. It could be someone big. It could be someone systemically important, someone that could really spook the markets. So when stuff like this happens, I get myself exposure to things that gain from disorder (paraphrasing Black Swan author Nassim Taleb).
With the S&P 500 Index (SPX) at 2,050 and the CBOE’s Volatility Index (VIX) at about 15, systemic risk is vastly underpriced.
I’m not saying that stocks are too high, that I’m bearish. I’m just saying that the derivatives markets aren’t pricing in what could be a big unwind based on these oil and dollar moves.
Translation: volatility is cheap.
Is $60 oil bullish for stocks, long term? Absolutely. It is one of the most bullish things I can think of. One of my clients recently told me that this decline in oil will result in $100,000 in annual fuel savings for his business. Multiply that times everyone. So bullish. And the dollar, also long-term bullish. But in the short term, there’s an Amaranth out there somewhere, potentially.
Maybe it’s not a hedge fund. Maybe it’s a company like Coca-Cola (KO) that gets the majority of its earnings from overseas. Maybe it’s the railroads. The person who can figure this out wins the prize.
As I said before, I’m not that smart… just a former trader with scabs on his knuckles. But the funny thing about those traders—especially the ones over 40—is they have a nose for trouble. I’m all in favor of bullish developments, just not when they happen really fast and nobody is ready, which is how people get maimed.
Position: long three-month SPY puts, short Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) (the US-listed shares).

Jared Dillian
2014 hasn’t been the best year for mining companies, and those involved in exploration and development have been having an especially difficult time. Indeed, a recent white paper from SNL Metals & Mining is not out of line in calling the situation a “persistent financing drought.”
However, despite the volatile market, there’s definitely still some silver lining out there. A recent report from Haywood Securities entitled “Down But Not Out — Identifying Opportunities in the Exploration and Development Space” looks at several companies that the firm believes are positioned to do well next year.
Overall, Haywood suggests that “while the [exploration and development] group may be down, it is certainly not out, with many good opportunities remaining.”
….continue reading 7 Companies ‘Best Positioned to Deliver in 2015′ HERE
Briefly: In our opinion, speculative short positions are favored (with stop-loss at 2,085 and profit target at 1,950, S&P 500 index).
Our intraday outlook is bearish, and our short-term outlook is bearish:
Intraday (next 24 hours) outlook: bearish
Short-term (next 1-2 weeks) outlook: bearish
Medium-term (next 1-3 months) outlook: neutral
Long-term outlook (next year): bullish
The U.S. stock market indexes lost 1.5-1.6% on Wednesday, extending their short-term downtrend, as investors reacted to worsening global economic conditions. The S&P 500 index broke below its early November consolidation, as it got closer to the level of 2,000. The nearest important level of support is at around 2,000-2020. On the other hand, resistance level is at around 2,040-2,050, marked by previous local lows, among others. For now, it looks like a correction within an uptrend, however, a negative reversal scenario cannot be excluded here:
Expectations before the opening of today’s trading session are slightly positive, with index futures currently up 0.1-0.2%. The European stock market indexes have been mixed so far. Investors will now wait for some economic data announcements: Initial Claims, Retail Sales at 8:30 a.m., Business Inventories at 10:00 a.m. The S&P 500 futures contract (CFD) bounces off support level at around 2,020-2,025. The nearest important level of resistance remains at 2,030-2,035, marked by recent local low, and the next resistance level is at 2,050-2,060, as we can see on the 15-minute chart:
The technology Nasdaq 100 futures contract (CFD) follows a similar path, as it bounces off support level at around 4,200-4,220. The nearest important level of resistance is at around 4,250-4,260, marked by previous support level, among others, as the 15-minute chart shows:
Concluding, the broad stock market extended its short-term downtrend. We continue to maintain our already profitable speculative short position. Stop-loss is at 2,085 and potential profit target is at 1,950 (S&P 500 index). It is always important to set some exit price level in case some events cause the price to move in the unlikely direction. Having safety measures in place helps limit potential losses while letting the gains grow.
Thank you.

In November 2014 Edmonton single family detached average prices (green plot line) hit a new historical high while the rest of the big city metros took a break under their respective highs in a year that is seeing the total MLS sales across Canada project the biggest single sales year since the 2008-2009 plunge.
It remains interesting to note that the combined average price of a Vancouver, Calgary & Toronto condo is currently 26% more expensive than a median priced Montreal SFD and note also that in the spring of 2006, those 3-City average condos zoomed 58% in price (over $100,000) in just 3 months as the buy side of the market freaked out over the inversion of the 10yr less the 2yr spread as it went negative (Yield Curve).
Mattress money has gushed into condos with no respect for fundamentals or plan for contingencies that may be required if Pit of Gloom II develops and one must write off capital gains and rely on employment earnings.
The average detached housing prices for Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Toronto, Ottawa* and Montréal* as well as the average of Vancouver, Calgary and Toronto condo (apartment) prices (Left Axis).
On the right axis is the MLS Annual Total Residential Sales across Canada; the most recent data point being a projection to year end.






It’s not just surfers who scrutinize wave patterns. Steven Hochberg, chief market analyst at Elliott Wave International, uses the Wave Principle to predict the movements of commodities and the stock market based on a number of factors, including sentiment. In this interview with 



