Stocks & Equities

The VIX is Saying Go Forward With Trepidation

As we commented last Wednesday, this close up view of the VIX is showing a triangular pattern that has morphed into a secondary triangular pattern.

Yesterday, the VIX closed at 17.33 which was inside the new triangular formation, but with an up and down breach of the prior formation.

The medium term negativity has not been erased yet because we still have July to January up trend … so that means go forward with trepidation.

36597

 

About Marty Chenard

Marty Chenard is an Advanced Stock Market Technical Analyst that has developed his own proprietary analytical tools and stock market models. As a result, he was out of the market two weeks before the 1987 Crash in the most recent Bear Market he faxed his Members in March 2000 telling them all to SELL. He is an advanced technical analyst and not an investment advisor, nor a securities broker.

Big Oil, Big Headaches, and Big Opportunities

imagesA three-day rally in crude prices last week is giving investors hope that the collapse in oil prices is over, and the market is reacting with strong moves to the upside in “Big Oil” stocks.

However, it may be too soon to draw either a correlation or conclusion; oil inventories and futures markets suggest that oil prices could easily head back down before stabilizing later this year (we saw a glimpse of this early Wednesday). The share price drops have significantly affected the “Oil Patch” sector, with the Energy Select SPDR ETF (NYSE Arca: XLE) down 26% since peaking at $100.93 on June 20, 2014.

Is an oil price rally for real, or just a head-fake we need to ignore for now?

The answer may just surprise you… and help you profit.

Big Oil Revenues Are Dropping Faster than Oil Prices

It should come as no surprise that lower oil prices are hurting the earnings of big oil companies.

Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) reported a 21% decline in fourth quarter (12/31/14) revenues and profits due to lower oil prices. The company earned $6.57 billion in the quarter, its worst showing since the first quarter of 2010, on revenue of $87.28 billion.

A year ago the company earned $8.35 billion on $110.86 billion of revenues. On a per-share basis, Exxon’s fourth quarter earnings were down 18.3% to $1.56 per share for the fourth quarter but were up year over year by 3.1% to $7.60 per share.

Meanwhile, Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) earned $3.5 billion in the fourth quarter (12/31/14) on $42 billion in sales, and $19.2 billion for all of 2014 on $200 billion in sales.

These figures were sharply lower than a year earlier when the company earned $21.4 billion on $220 billion of revenues. On a per-share basis, the company earned $1.86 per fully diluted share in the fourth quarter of 2014, down 28% from a year earlier.

For the full year, Chevron’s per-share earnings dropped by 8.6% to $10.14 per share. Clearly the earnings decline was back-loaded as oil prices collapsed over the back half of the year.

The falling price of oil foreshadowed the downward momentum of share prices, with investors watching the slow, but steady, trend lines sliding ever lower.

Indeed, since peaking at $104.38 on June 23, 2014, Exxon Mobil stock has dropped to $89.58 on February 2, a 14.2% hit.

Similarly, Chevron stock peaked at $134.85 on July 24, 2014, and has since fallen to $106.06 on February 2, an even larger 21.3% pounding.

The pattern is similar for many of the majors – lower oil prices equal lower stock prices.

Here’s How Big Oil Responds in Crises

The oil majors are responding to the collapse in the price of their primary product by reducing or suspending stock buybacks and cutting capital spending.

Both of these moves will have serious ramifications for the markets and the economy.

When it comes to capital spending, the majors are still committed to huge projects around the world that they can’t cut back, but will make major adjustments as necessary.

Already we saw Exxon Mobil spend $6 billion less on capital and exploration projects in 2014 than the year before, reducing those annual expenditures to $38.5 billion from $44.5 billion.

We can expect that figure to be even lower in 2015.

However, Exxon Mobil is moving ahead with new projects in Romania and Argentina, and capturing new acreage in Canada, Africa, and the North Sea. It is also moving ahead with longstanding projects in Russia, Abu Dhabi, and the Gulf of Mexico designed to boost oil and gas production.

Chevron said it would cut its spending by $5 billion but will still shell out a hefty $35 billion on major projects, including shale projects for which it is committed, in 2015.

Other majors are also reducing their CAPEX spending by large amounts, while still spending big bucks. ConocoPhilips (NYSE: COP) is lowering spending on new oil and gas projects by 15% and Occidental Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: OXY) by 33%. But these companies are like giant tankers sailing the world and can’t quickly change course when they encounter a storm. They have to plan for what happens when calm seas return.

While capital expenditure programs are difficult to simply cut on a whim, stock buybacks are much easier to cut back on a dime.

Exxon Mobil announced that it was reducing its stock buyback program by two-thirds to $1 billion this quarter (it bought back $3.3 billion of stock in the final quarter of 2014) while Chevron announced that it was suspending its share buyback program for 2015 after buying back $1.25 billion in the fourth quarter and $5.0 billion in all of 2014.

Stock buybacks have been major factors in supporting stock prices over the past couple of years.  Their absence will be significantly felt, especially if oil prices remain weak in the months ahead.

After muddling through a gain of just over 2% in the past year (well below the S&P 500’s 17.2% gain over the same period), Exxon Mobil stock now trades at 12.2x earnings and pays a 3.0% dividend. Chevron stock suffered just north of a 1% drop over the past year, and is slightly cheaper at 10.8x earnings but pays a higher 4.0% dividend.

As always, the question is when to buy stocks that have dropped as much as these have over the past seven months. Given the poor earnings announcements, cutbacks in capital spending, and slowdowns in stock buyback programs, it is too early to dive into the beaten down stocks of the oil giants with fresh money. Investors expecting a near-term pop may be disappointed since oil prices are unlikely to recover quickly.

However, Exxon Mobil and Chevron stock are trading at reasonable valuations while still paying attractive, and increasing, dividends. Investors are unlikely to be hurt if they’re already in the stock, and plan to own these shares for a period of years.

For those of you already in the stock as long-term shareholders, hang on… It’s going to be a bumpy ride!

What the Aden Sisters Are Watching Before Jumping Back into Natural Resources

Technically, gold should be under $1,140 per ounce, but instead it is rising with the strong dollar. In this interview with The Gold Report, Pamela and Mary Anne Aden, authors of The Aden Forecast, see value in gold and silver and share their four favorite vehicles for gaining exposure to the upside in natural resources that is coming on the heels of a volatile currency upset.

naturalresources580 1

The Gold ReportWe only a month into 2015 and already the economic news has been dramatic. Switzerland decoupled the franc from the euro. The European Central Bank (ECB) has announced quantitative easing (QE). The Russian ruble is crashing along with oil prices, but the U.S. stock market seems to be soaring. What indicators are you watching and what are you expecting in the global economy in 2015? 

Pamela Aden: Never a dull moment. The biggest beneficiary of all this turmoil has been the dollar. The dollar index is at 10-year highs. Meanwhile the euro and the Canadian dollar have gotten caught up in a deflationary cycle along with oil and commodities.

Mary Anne Aden: We are watching the exchange rate and the cross rate. The strength of the dollar is the key because it has become the world’s favorite safe haven in these times of uncertainty. Everyone is quite concerned about what’s coming next. With the renewed liquidity from the ECB and the Bank of Japan, the decoupling of the Swiss franc and the collapse of the oil price, fundamental factors like gross domestic product and debt levels have almost been tossed by the wayside. The wild events in currency markets are impacting the stock markets in a big way. 

PA: It is also having an effect on the bond market. A year ago the bond market bottom was rising. It became one of the biggest surprise investments for 2014. Even the end of QE in the U.S. in October didn’t preclude another leg up. We think the bond rise is going to continue this year. And with all the liquidity in the system, the stock Screen Shot 2015-02-05 at 6.55.59 AMmarket could keep rising too. 

Another shock was that when the dollar really started taking off, we saw the gold market bottom and start to rise. Technically, it was poised to fall under the $1,140 per ounce ($1,140/oz) low of November, but it didn’t. It held and started the new year rising sharply, becoming a safe haven with the dollar. Gold shares are following the gold price and so is silver. We were thinking 2015 would be a very likely time to see a bottom in this bear market, but we weren’t expecting to see the strong rise right at the beginning of the year. It’s certainly looking good right now.

TGR: Is the fact that the gold price has been flirting with $1,300/oz significant in the long term?

PA: When gold touched above $1,300/oz everyone got excited. We are still watching closely to see if it stays above $1,265/oz in the next few months. That would be the sign of a solid bottoming action and turning bullish. Ideally, we would like to see it well above $1,300/oz and then a renewed strong confirm above last March’s high around $1,380/oz. It’s looking good so far. This is going to be a very interesting year.

Adenchart580.jpg

TGR: What is the fundamental foundation for that support? Is it Chinese buyers, central banks?

PA: It’s funny. In 2013 we saw the biggest leg down in this bear market starting with exchange-traded fund (ETF) selling versus physical buying. Now that the price is relatively low, we are seeing Chinese buying and Russian buying. For the ninth month in a row, Russia is buying gold in spite of the low oil price. A lot of central banks buy when the price is low. And there is safe-haven demand too. 

TGR: What about on the supply side? Is less gold being mined because companies are holding back when the price is so low?

PA: Yes, the supply has not been as abundant as it could be. That goes back to years ago when miners were hedging so much they never really caught up to full speed. There is still a drag on the gold mining business in general.

TGR: We have been talking about gold, but not all the commodities are the same. What are your charts telling you about gold and silver patterns compared to the dollar?

PA: Gold and silver both look good. Gold has been stronger than silver since the beginning of the year, but silver certainly looks good. If we see copper bottom a little bit from where it is at this terribly low level, we could see a much stronger silver price than gold, but for the moment gold is stronger than silver. We like them both. 

We think silver has a lot of upside potential over the next couple of years. This is the year for buying on weakness and holding. If you’re still invested we wouldn’t recommend selling at this point. We’d ride it out because we feel we’re coming to the end of the bear market. We may have already turned the corner, but it’s still to be seen. We recently increased our metals portion of our portfolio to 15%. We’ll probably raise it more if these metals keep rising.

TGR: You have called gold shares the most hated market today. Sprott US Holdings CEO Rick Rule would say that’s a sign that it’s a good time to buy. How are you managing your precious metals positions right now? 

MAA: Even a month ago gold shares were probably the most hated market out there. They were totally ignored. They had dropped far more than any of the other markets. Now with gold going up, gold shares are looking so much better. 

Some are at very good buying levels, including Royal Gold Inc. (RGLD:NASDAQ; RGL:TSX). We also like the Central Fund of Canada Ltd. (CEF:NYSE.MKT; CEF.A:TSX). We like the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX:NYSE.Arca), which encompasses quite a few of the shares. We like Silver Wheaton Corp. (SLW:TSX; SLW:NYSE). Those are the shares that we like, but there are an awful lot of them that are looking good. We just want to see a little more development before we start recommending any juniors.

PA: If you just want to look at value for value, we totally agree with Rick. Some companies with great value are clearly on sale. The energy companies are also totally on sale. There are some values there to be picked up, but we are a little apprehensive until we see a clear bottom. 

MAA: I’m sure this will be a very good year for picking up good value companies.

TGR: Two of the companies that you mentioned are royalty companies, Royal Gold and Silver Wheaton. What do you see as the role of royalty companies during a bear market like this and are they a long-term leverage play on the future of commodity prices?

MAA: Royalties have held up so well compared to gold shares during the bear market. They have the money and the power. We think they do well on the upside and they aren’t so bad on the downside. They actually are the best during both the bull and bear markets.

TGR: Why these two royalty companies?

MAA: There are others that look good, but Royal Gold has been performing very well. We like to have our foot in the door on silver and Silver Wheaton is our favorite way to do that. They are both solid companies with good backing.

TGR: On platinum group metals, what is the supply and demand outlook for this year?

MAA: Palladium has been bucking the trend of the precious metals for the last few years by rising. It moved with the car industry, as it is a key component in catalytic converter systems. Improving global car sales boosted the metal, but the slowdown in global growth might put an end to that upward trend, at least compared to the other metals. 

Platinum is starting to look perky, but it’s not convincing yet. It was the darling of the bull market up to 2008, then clearly took a backseat and never really recuperated. Platinum is still below its 2008 low and it is a dull precious metal compared to gold and silver. It needs to prove itself more before we would consider buying.

TGR: Any advice for natural resource investors going into 2015?

MAA: Keep your eye on Dr. Copper. It has been falling with oil in recent months. When copper starts to bottom, it clearly reflects growth in China and the world. We would steer clear of resources until we see a little bit of a turn in copper and oil.

TGR: Do you agree with that, Pamela?

PA: People ask us that all the time: Do you two always agree on everything? Usually we do. When we disagree, it is usually on the resource sector. No resource looks very tempting on a value level. BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP:NYSE; BHPLF:OTCPK) is totally bombed out. It looks almost like the oil price, and the Australian dollar has been terribly weak. 

MAA: I agree that BHP Billiton is bombed out, but I think it is a good value. The problem is that a market can stay bombed out for a couple of years. That is where I tend to disagree with Pam. Yes, there’s value, but there could be value a year from now and with this deflationary drag on the world economy I would not be quick to jump on those yet. 

That is why I am watching copper. If it starts to show some life and strength on the upside, it would be a good sign that global growth is probably going to be right behind it. That would be a real good sign for the resource sector.

TGR: Thank you both for your time.

Pamela and Mary Anne Aden are the co-editors and publishers of The Aden Forecast, which specializes in the U.S. and global stock markets, the precious metals and foreign exchange markets, as well as U.S. and international interest rates and bonds. The Adens are the directors of Aden Research, based in San Jose, Costa Rica. They have authored dozens of reports and articles and have spoken at investment seminars around the world. Their work has been featured in newspapers in several countries, in such publications as Bloomberg Businessweek, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, Smart Money, Barron’s, The London Financial Times, as well as CNBC and the international television documentary, Women of the World.

Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.

Related Articles

 

 

DISCLOSURE: 
1) JT Long conducted this interview for Streetwise Reports LLC, publisher of The Gold Report, The Energy Report, The Life Sciences Report and The Mining Report, and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an employee. She owns, or her family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: Silver Wheaton Corp. The companies mentioned in this interview were not involved in any aspect of the interview preparation or post-interview editing so the expert could speak independently about the sector. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services.
3) Pamela and Mary Anne Aden: We own, or our family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. We personally are paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. Our company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. We were not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are our own comments and opinions. We determined and had final say over which companies would be included in the interview based on research, understanding of the sector and interview theme. We had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of publication and are responsible for the content of the interview. 
4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent. 
5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.
6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.

 

The Bravado of Borrowers

UnknownLast week a scene unfolded in Athens, largely unnoticed by American eyes, that provided all the visual and metaphorical symbols needed to define the current state of the global economy. Hollywood’s best screenwriters couldn’t have laid it out any better.

Tiring of being told by self-righteous foreigners to pay for past borrowing with current austerity, the Greek people had just elected the most radically left-wing government in recent memory, whose stated goal was to tell their creditors that they were not going to take it anymore. The leadership of the victorious Syriza Party, a collection of mostly young Marxist and Trotskyite academics, had promised the Greek people a clean break from the past and an end to years of economic malaise. Although their plan seemed fundamentally contradictory (telling foreign creditors to butt out even while courting more aid), Syriza nonetheless appealed to a frustrated electorate through their dynamism and optimism. 

To show that they were not just another upstart coalition that would co-opt the status quo once elected, Syriza leaders adopted the posture, vocabulary and clothing of revolutionaries. Throughout his campaign, Alex Tsirpas, the new prime minister, refused to wear a tie, thereby eschewing the most potent symbol of traditional power. When sworn in as prime minister, also with an open collar, he dispensed with the “hand on the bible” ceremony and instead invoked the spirit of fallen Greek Marxists. Since the election Syriza leaders have hot toned down their rhetoric as many predicted they would. Could it be that they actually meant what they said?

Syriza’s fiery attitude has put Greece on a collision course with northern European leaders who face the political necessity of requiring Greece to repay previously delivered bail out money. In this context the first meeting between Yanis Varoufakis, the newly installed Greek Finance minister and Jeroen Dijsselbloem the Dutch representative of the so-called “troika” of lenders (The European Central Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the European Commission), was bound to produce some drama. The meeting exceeded expectations on that front. But how it looked was perhaps more important than what was said.

In a room packed with cameras and reporters, Varoufakis strode in not just tieless and open collared, but with his shirt shockingly untucked. He ambled to his chair, and sat slouching backwards with his legs crossed like a poker player barely able to contain the glee of a winning hand. His expressions were effusive, satirical, and defiant. All he lacked were sunglasses and a couple of groupies to complete the rock star persona. To his right sat the stiff necked, buttoned-down Dutchman, who in the words of Colonel Kurtz appeared like “an errand boy, sent by grocery clerks, to collect a bill.”

The two agreed on seemingly nothing. Dijsselbloem insisted that the new Greek government live up to the austerity and repayment commitments, and Varoufakis said that the Greeks would no longer negotiate with the creditors who he believed were responsible for his country’s destitution. When there was really nothing left to say, the meeting came to an abrupt end and the two executed a painfully awkward handshake. Dijsselbloem, seeming annoyed, avoided eye contact with his counterpart and left the room without looking back. On the other hand, Varoufakis, seemingly enjoying the moment, shrugged his shoulders and smiled for the cameras, as if to say “What’s up with the stuffed shirt?”

What could explain these contrasting attitudes? Shouldn’t the creditor, the one lending the money, and the party who will be asked for more, be in the power position? Shouldn’t the borrower be in position of supplication? If you thought that, you don’t understand the current way of the world. Based on the ascendancy of Keynesian “demand side” economics it is the borrower who is considered the key driver of growth. The theory holds that if the borrower stops borrowing they will also stop spending. When that happens they believe the entire economy collapses, dragging down both lenders and borrowers in the process. From that perspective, the bigger the borrower the greater his importance, and the more leverage he has with the lender. This is like the old adage: “If you owe the bank $10, that’s your problem. But if you owe the bank $10 million dollars, that’s the bank’s problem.”

Syriza knows that northern European leaders are terrified at the prospect of disintegration of the EU and the stability it provides. The goal of maintaining open and essentially captive markets for German manufacturers was the prime reason that pried open Berlin’s wallet in the first place. But Syriza also understands the power that debtors have in today’s world. Default leads to liquidations, which in turn leads to deflation, the biggest bugaboo in the Keynesian night gallery of economic fears. After years of bailouts of banks, corporations, and governments, debtors know that no one is ready to risk another Lehman Brothers type collapse on any level. The bar of “Too Big to Fail” has gotten progressively lower. If Greece can repudiate its debts, the temptation for larger indebted nations like Italy and Spain to do the same will be ever greater.

This understanding fuels not only the swagger of the Greek finance minister but also the attitude of the world’s largest debtor, the United States of America. Although the $1 Trillion dollar plus annual budget deficits have been cut significantly in recent years (thought the national debt has exploded beyond $18 trillion), I believe the reduction is largely a function of the asset bubbles that have been engineered by the Fed’s six year program of quantitative easing and zero percent interest rates. Any sustained economic downturn could immediately send the red ink back into record territory. But flush with his victory speech/State of the Union address, President Obama has adopted a bit of the Varoufakis bravado.

President Obama’s newly unveiled 2015 budget includes almost $500 billion in new spending; effectively dispensing with the token austerity that Washington had imposed on itself with the 2011 “Sequester.” In my opinion, the U.S. has virtually no hope of paying for all of our spending through taxation, the budget busting proposals should be viewed as a message to our foreign creditors that we plan on borrowing plenty more, and that we expect that they will keep lending for as long as we want. From a global economics perspective the United States is like Greece writ very, very large. Much like the Northern European countries, the major exporting nations around the world are terrified that their economies would be shut out of U.S. markets if their currencies were to strengthen against the dollar. I believe this has allowed America to approach its finances with impunity.

But this confidence may be leading to trouble. If the new Greek government keeps following its current course, it may ultimately be shown the door of the Eurozone. Although a “Grexit” may ultimately pave the way for a real Greek recovery, the Greeks themselves should have no illusions about how painful this journey may be. Without the purchasing power of the euro and the largesse of the creditors supporting them, the Greeks may find themselves with a basket case currency that delivers far lower living standards. If Greek government employees thought austerity was bad when it was imposed from Brussels, wait until they see how bad it’s going to be when imposed by Athens. In fact, no Greek recovery will be possible until the newly elected Marxists become unapologetic capitalists.

When the Swiss National Bank decided to abruptly reverse course on its euro peg, the world should have been treated to a fresh lesson at the finite nature of creditor patience. While this message may have been lost on most observers, sooner or later this reality will sink in. When it does, the shirts will be tucked, the ties will be fastened, and knees just may start bending.

This New Project Changes The Global Oil Market

We saw one of the most significant shifts in a long while for energy markets last week. With a key pipeline opening that will radically change global flows of crude oil.

The project in question is the China-Myanmar oil pipeline. Which Chinese state media said on Thursday has now opened for test runs.

The pipeline is one of the most ambitious constructions the global energy sector has seen. Running 771 kilometres from Myanmar’s western coastal port of Kyaukphyu, across the entire length of that country, and into the Chinese city of Kunming. The diagram below from Stratfor shows the route.

9578bb0a-8529-4c23-b7ba-7ebcf49e0166

The line has been an ongoing project for years now. With construction having begun in 2010, and been completed in May 2014. A twin natural gas pipeline that’s also part of the development was put into operation last year.

The size of the pipeline is notable. But its location is even more significant when it comes to the worldwide movement of oil.

Because the pipe provides the first overland access between China and shipments of crude sailing from the Middle East.

Up until now, Middle East tankers were forced to sail through the Straits of Malacca between Indonesia and Malaysia in order to reach Asian buyers. A route that’s noted to be treacherous, and which adds almost two weeks to the journey for an average Saudi Arabia-to-Shanghai shipment.

Such crude can now be offloaded on the Myanmar coast and sent straight into the heart of China. Giving buyers here a major cost saving–and giving China a huge leg up over other Asian consumers like Japan and Korea when it comes to securing supply.

The capacity on the new line is significant–able to move 160 million barrels yearly, or about 440,000 barrels per day. Equivalent to just under 0.5% of total global oil demand.

That might just be enough to change prices for some crude blends. Watch for increasing competition amongst other Asian oil buyers, and increased shipments coming into this region from suppliers outside the Middle East.

Here’s to strategic assets,

Dave Forest

test-php-789