Asset protection

Signs to Watch for a Major Peak in Stocks and Impending Bear Market (Update)

UpdateThe market’s push to new recrod highs last month failed to prevent a significant divergence from forming with the relative strength index. This is one of the three signs I highlighted for a possible peak in stocks. See updated chart and commentary below…

It is said that an image is worth a thousand words. This chart conveys a very important message when it comes to the future direction of the stock market and whether investors should be concerned about a coming bear market. We explain the chart in more detail below.

Larger Chart

spx-long-term-update

In the very top panel of the chart you’ll notice that the stock market as measured by the S&P 500 is overbought on a

long-term basis. This is no surprise and shows that we are now trading at levels seen during the two prior market tops. That said, the stock market can remain in overbought territory for an extended period of time, which is why we need to focus on more timely signals (red flags) for when this condition may reverse. Of the three I present, one has now been raised.

Red Flag Number One (√)

The first technical warning sign that we should heed is marked by a significant divergence between the relative strength index (RSI) and the market itself. This is noted by a declining pattern of lower highs in the RSI as stocks continue to make higher highs, a sign that the market is “topping out”. In the late ‘90s this divergence persisted for many years as the tech bubble reached epic valuation levels. In 2007 this divergence lasted over a much shorter period (6 months) before the market finally peaked and succumbed to massive selling. With last month’s strong rally to new records, we now have a confirmed divergence between the long-term relative strength index and the market’s price action (as shown in the chart above).

Since this divergence can persist for months or years, we also look to two other technical red flags for possible signs of a market peak and impending bear market.

Red Flag Number Two

The second technical sign to look for is a major crossover in the MACD (moving average convergence-divergence) indicator shown in the bottom panel. This is often used by technical analysts as a buy and sell signal. As shown by the dotted lines, a MACD crossover occurred in May of 2000 and December of 2007. Currently, we see the market has steadily lost momentum since the beginning of 2014 but has yet to issue a sell signal. A sustained break below the 12-month moving average may trigger such an event. That brings us to the third technical signal we need to watch.

Red Flag Number Three

When a major line of support becomes resistance, you now have confirmation of a trend change in the market. This occurred around January-February of 2001 and May-June of 2008 (see red circled regions on the chart) when the S&P 500 failed to break back above its 12-month moving average. After that point in time, the market persisted in a bearish downtrend until a confirmed change of direction with a new bull market. Currently, the market is trading above this major line of support and only briefly broke below in October of last year.

Summary

One of the three red flags we should watch for gauging a possible market peak has been raised. Since this first technical warning sign can persist for a period of months to years (remember, market tops are a process and not an event), we will now want to see if a major sell signal is triggered by a crossover in the MACD, as occurred at both prior tops in 2000 and 2007, and then lastly with a major trend change when the 12-month moving average no longer acts as support but as a line of major resistance.

Again, we should not presuppose this pattern will play out on an immediate timeframe. The market may make new highs in overbought territory with a continuous divergence on the RSI. As always, opinions are quite divided on whether stocks are already in a bubble or, conversely, in the beginning stages of a much larger advance (see Martin Armstrong’s interview below). There are too many moving parts to predict such outcomes with any certainty. Instead, we must monitor market action, incoming data, and make adjustments as the situation requires. The chart presented is one of many tools for doing just that.

Related:

 

The Frightening Truth About What The Elites Are Up To

KWN-Quayle-II-352015-1728x800 cToday a man who has been uncovering critical information for 25 years spoke with King World News about the frightening truth regarding what the elites are really up to.  This is a terrifying trip down the rabbit hole of internet censorship, theft of assets and the war against the truth. 

Stephen Quayle:  “There is no longer such a thing as a level playing field in international markets and truth in America is all but dead.  Rape, pillage and plunder is the new motto.  In the Wonderland of program trading, artificial intelligence and a rigged casino, playing in the elite’s sandbox is a no-win situation….

…continue reading the Stephen Quayle interview HERE

What Is A Key Ratio Saying About Stock Market Risk?

If you knew (or thought) a bear market in stocks was just around the corner, would you prefer to be invested in 100% stocks or 100% bonds? Since the S&P 500 lost over 50% in the last two bear markets (2000-2002 and 2007-2009), the answer is easy. Therefore, we can learn something about the market’s tolerance for risk by monitoring the ratio of stocks to bonds.

Dot-Com Yellow Flag

Since the aggregate bond ETF (AGG) was not trading in 1999, we will use the highly correlated Vanguard Total Bond Market Fund (VBMFX) for this exercise. The chart below shows the performance of the S&P 500 relative to a diversified basket of bonds. Since some investors became concerned about the sustainability of the dot-com bubble in late 1999, the demand for stocks started to wane relative to bonds, which was indicative of increasing concern about stocks and the economy (see slope of orange line below).

36867 b

Financial Crisis Warning

The same “risk-on vs. risk-off” logic can be applied to the stock market peak in October 2007. The ratio peaked 5 months before the S&P 500 (compare slope of orange and green lines below).

36867 c

How Does The Same Ratio Look Today?

Rather than waving “be careful with risk” flags in 2015, the same stock/bond ratio posted a new monthly closing high in February. The blue and red moving averages also look much healthier in 2015 than they did in the higher-risk stages of 2000 and 2007.

36867 d

Investment Implications – The Weight Of The Evidence

Do the charts above provide an “all clear” signal for stocks? No – the present day stock/bond ratio simply tells us the probability of a new bear market kicking off in the next several weeks is quite a bit lower than it was in March 2000 or October 2007. Since the ratio studied here is not foolproof, our market model uses a wide array of inputs. A February 27 video covers the concepts above, as well as other risk measures, in more detail.

 

What Do These Two Charts Have In Common?

The premise of a currency war is that by devaluing its currency a country is able to sell things overseas more cheaply, which gooses its growth at the expense of its trading partners.

If it actually works that way, then you’d expect this chart of the euro plunging against the dollar..

46869 a

…to be reflected in some sort of strong-dollar related downturn in the US. And right on cue, the Fed reported this morning that American manufacturers are now in the sixth month of a new-orders slowdown:

46869 b

If things continue to play out according to script the coming year will be slightly better than expected for Europe (but only slightly because of all the other messes those guys have made of their common currency experiment) and quite a bit worse than expected for the US (because we actually think we’re recovering).

Then comes the next and final stage of the cycle, where the US realizes that it’s tipping back into recession, with all the unacceptable things that that implies for the equity bubble, tax revenues and campaign contributions, and shifts gears from tightening to open-the-floodgates loose, hoping to push the dollar back down against the euro, yen and yuan. The difference this time around will be that, as Europe is now discovering, easing monetary policy when interest rates are already zero means pushing into negative numbers. And that means yet another leap of faith into uncharted, experimental, very possibly disastrous territory.

UnknownWith currencies being rapidly devalued by their respective governments, the global economy in a slow-down, and tensions over resources heating up around the world, it’s time to start considering the endgame.

According to billionaire resource investor Carlo Civelli there is likely no way out for central banks which have spent the last several years printing money hand over fist. Over his decades’ long career Civelli has either managed or financed over 20 companies, many of which now have market capitalizations in the billions of dollars, so he knows a thing or two about investing during boom times, as well as busts.

In his most recent interview with Future Money Trends he warns of  an endgame scenario that is nothing short of a total collapse. And here’s the scary part: Civelli says that even gold may not be a safe haven should the worst case scenario play out….continue reading HERE

test-php-789