Energy & Commodities

NUMBERS PROVE IT: The U.S. Oil Industry Is In Serious Trouble

There is this silly notion that the United States will become energy independent in the next several years, thus making it unnecessary to import oil from Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia. While some fairy tales in life may come true…. U.S. energy independence isn’t one of them.

Even though the U.S. is supposedly producing more oil than it has in 42 years, this is a party that won’t last long. According to the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA), the United States produced an amazing 9.4 million barrels per day (mbd) during the week of 3/20/15, compared to 9.3 mbd of oil back in December, 1972.

That being said, there still seems to be a significant percentage of mortals out there who believe “Peak Oil” is complete nonsense as the Abiotic Oil Theory proves that oil fields continue to refill from the black gold that is produced deep inside the creamy nougat center of the earth.

One individual who continues to regurgitate this Abiotic Oil Theory is Jerome Corsi, the author of Black Gold Stranglehold. Corsi, who is a frequent guest on the late night talk show Coast-to-Coast-Am, believes high oil prices over the past decade were due to the manipulation by the greedy corrupt major oil companies.

Well, Mr. Corsi might know how to write a great book to get the conspiracy folks all worked up, but applying simple 4th grade math totally destroys his faulty theories.

The Falling EROI (Energy Returned On Invested) from 100/1 in the 1930’s to Shale Oil at 5/1 today, proves that oil fields ARE NOT filling back up. For clarification, the EROI of 100/1 means the U.S. oil industry was burning one barrel of oil in the 1930’s to produce 100 barrels for the market.

If the U.S. oil fields were refilling, then why are the poor slobs wasting time losing money drilling in the Bakken?? The oil industry in the U.S. was finding new oil fields during the early 1900’s with EROI in the 100’s and 1,000’s. Again, why on earth would the majority of these greedy corrupt oil companies continue so suffer from negative Free Cash Flow operating in the Bakken, if all they had to do was extract much more profitable oil that was refilling in old fields?

You see, the logic and common sense here is very simple and easy to understand. I am completely surprised at how seemingly intelligent individuals can fall for some of the most INSANE THEORIES.

Okay, here is the chart that also reveals why the United States is UP A CREEK WITHOUT A PADDLE. In 2014, the U.S. produced a lousy 5,665 barrels of oil per drilling rig compared to Saudi Arabia at a staggering 157,335 per drilling rig. Saudi Arabia produced 27 times more oil per oil drilling rig than the U.S. in 2014.

U.S.-vs-Saudi-Arabia-Oil-Production-Per-Drilling-Rig

I gather Saudi Arabia’s oil fields are doing a much better job refilling than ours. Of course, I am only kidding.

The average oil drilling rig number for the U.S. in 2014 was 1,527 versus Saudi Arabia at a whopping 62… LOL. However, the current low oil price has cut the U.S. oil drilling rig fleet nearly in half from a high of 1,600 in 2014, to 825 today. According to data from Euan Mearns at Energy Matters, Saudi Arabia’s oil rig count increased to 75 in February.

If you look at the right bar in the chart above, you will see that due to the U.S. cutting its oil drilling rig fleet in half since 2014, its average oil production per rig has doubled. Again… LOL. This is not a good sign. Even though the Saudi’s average declined a bit from 157,335 barrels per rig in 2014 down to 129,333 presently, they can afford to increase their drilling rigs while the U.S. oil industry has done the opposite. The U.S. oil industry is in BIG TROUBLE.

How much trouble?? Well, this next chart just may give us an idea of what’s to come.

Bakken-March-2015-Chart

According to the EIA’s recently released March 2015 Productivity Report, the Bakken is forecasted to show a decline in production in April by 8,000 barrels per day. This may only be a small number, but this is only an estimate… which may be totally inaccurate.

The North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources released their Production Report for January which stated the following:

ND-Directors-Cut1

Here we can see that the Bakken’s production declined from 1,227,483 barrels per day in December, to 1,190,490 in January 2015. If we look at the U.S. EIA’s Productivity Report for the same month, this was their estimate:

Bakken-Jan-2014-Chart

Something is very wrong here. The U.S. EIA shows an increase of 27,000 barrels per day in January while the North Dakota DMR publishes a decline of 37,000 barrels per day. Again, the EIA’s reports are estimates.

So, if North Dakota is already showing a decline in Bakken oil production in January, how bad would it be by the middle of the year? I believe energy analyst Art Berman may indeed be correct forecasting Shale Oil Production Will Fall By 600,000 Barrels Per Day By June.

The United States will never become energy independent as its shale oil industry’s costs and decline rates are just too damn high. Furthermore, the U.S. still imported 6.9 million barrels per day of oil during the week of 3/20/15. There is no way the United States will ever close that gap.

For all the folks who still believe in the Abiotic Oil Theory or that the U.S. contains a trillion barrels of oil resources in the west, logic and common sense is not on your side. If the companies drilling in the Bakken with an EROI of 5/1 are losing money and are in debt up to their eyeballs, who in their right mind is going to extract the trillion barrels of lousy oil shale in the western U.S. at a lousy EROI of 2/1???

Note: Shale oil in the Bakken is technically called “Tight Oil”. However, shale oil should not be confused with oil shale. Oil shale is not even oil. To extract oil from oil shale, the shale has to be crushed and then heated to remove the oil. So, crappy low EROI oil shale resources should not be placed in the same category as high EROI light sweet crude.

Anyone who quotes the U.S. has a trillion barrels of oil resources (including that lousy oil shale), is doing so out of complete ignorance and stupidity.

Please check back for new articles and updates at the SRSrocco Report

Central banks paralysed at the zero bound

Though the Fed would deny it, it is clear from the minutes of the last Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting that a rise in interest rates has been put off indefinitely. The subsequent rally in the price of gold and the sudden fall in the dollar tend to confirm this conclusion.

The Fed Funds Rate, which is the interest rate the Fed targets to set all other rates, has now been less than 0.25% for six and a quarter years, gradually declining from roughly 0.15% to about 0.10% today. It was set at a target range of between zero and 0.25% in December 2008.

Effective Fed Funds Rate

According to the Policy Normalisation Principles and Plans issued last September, the FOMC will raise its target range for

the Fed Funds Rate “primarily by adjusting the interest rate it pays on excess reserve balances” when the Fed normalises interest rates, “using reverse repurchase agreements to take money out of circulation to the degree necessary”. The Fed also intends to reduce its holdings of securities and contract its balance sheet in the longer run.

 

If normalisation is the result of economic recovery we will be familiar with the playbook. Demand for money in the economy picks up, and instead of pyramiding bank credit on reserves held at the Fed, the Fed feeds back the excess reserves to the banks by selling government securities into the markets. The bear market in government bonds should be manageable because of underlying pension and insurance company demand coupled with a diminishing budget deficit. This is the long-understood theory behind withdrawing from deficit financing.

The reality has been very different as we all know. The Fed has to face the possibility that, for whatever reason, highly suppressed interest rates are not working, and an escape from the zero interest rate bound without economic recovery may have to be contemplated.

However, if the Fed raises the Fed Funds Rate in the absence of genuine economic recovery, there will be little or no expansion of bank credit to offset, and commercial banks will want to dump their Treasuries, not buy more from the Fed. There would be no offsets to cushion the unwinding of long bond positions. In other words the effect of even a small rise in the Fed Funds Rate could develop into a self-feeding rise in bond yields and substantial losses for the banks.

This is the context within which we should consider the Fed’s decision to back off from raising the Fed Funds Rate mid-year. It leads to the conclusion that if zero interest rates haven’t worked for six and a quarter years, monetary policy itself is in a cul-de-sac with no space to turn. And when we look at Japan and the Eurozone we see similar disappointments over the effectiveness of monetary policy.

Markets are unlikely to wait until the escape from the zero bound is put to the test. Before the investing public becomes aware of the full ramifications of the problem, more prescient bankers and fund managers will reposition their bond holdings, which brings us to gold.

Those of us that follow this market closely know that for the last three years at least Asian demand has led to large shifts of bullion from western capital markets towards Asia. The behaviour of the markets in London and New York already indicate that shortages of physical bullion are a delicate problem, and this is before markets wake up to the growing likelihood that the Fed cannot afford to see interest rates rise.

If interest rates cannot rise, then the dollar itself is ultimately exposed to loss of confidence in the foreign exchanges. The dawning realisation that after recent strength, the dollar is vulnerable after all can be expected to be reflected in a positive sentiment towards gold, which once under way could drive the price up dramatically due to the lack of available bullion.

The views and opinions expressed in the article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of GoldMoney, unless expressly stated. Please note that neither GoldMoney nor any of its representatives provide financial, legal, tax, investment or other advice. Such advice should be sought form an independent regulated person or body who is suitably qualified to do so. Any information provided in this article is provided solely as general market commentary and does not constitute advice. GoldMoney will not accept liability for any loss or damage, which may arise directly or indirectly from your use of or reliance on such information. – Buy Gold Online

The Hunts Cornering of the Silver Market & $50 Silver in 1980

dsaSilver Spikes in Perspective

When the Hunt’s had begun accumulating silver back in 1973 the price was in the $1.95 per ounce range. Early in ’79, the price was about $5. In late ’79-early ’80 the price was in the $50’s, peaking at $54.”

“Keep in mind that it was illegal for private citizens to hold gold at that time. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt had signed Executive Order 6102, “The Gold Confiscation Act,” in 1933 and for the next forty-one years it was illegal for U.S. citizens to “hoard” gold. Since gold, the traditional store of wealth, was not a viable option, the Hunts decided to hold their wealth in silver and began to buy it in enormous quantities.

“Since they were concerned with inflation and the potential confiscation of precious metals following Nixon’s closing of the gold window, (the same worries that keep some people up at night even today) they arranged for transfer of the bullion to Switzerland.”

“By 1979 the Hunts had nearly cornered the global market. This was a time of uncertainty.”

…read the whole story HERE

Futures tick lower as dollar gains ahead of Yellen

UnknownNEW YORK (Reuters) – U.S. stock index futures dipped on Friday, setting indexes up for a full week of daily declines, as the dollar index added to the previous session’s rebound ahead of a speech from Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen.

* Yellen will speak on monetary policy at the San Francisco Fed at 3:45 p.m. EDT.

….read more HERE

The Narwhal Club: Home to Canada’s $1 Billion Dollar Tech Startups

Screen Shot 2015-03-26 at 2.05.22 PMIn 2013, Aileen Lee of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers came up with the concept of the “Unicorn Club”, for tech startups reaching valuations of $1 billion or more. For venture capitalists, this number is much like unicorns themselves – very magical. It resembles big potential exits that can make up for all the startup investments that don’t pan out.

Brent Holliday at Garibaldi Capital Advisors, a Vancouver-based capital advisory with a focus on technology, thought there needed to be a Canadian equivalent. He created the concept of the “Narwhal Club”, based on the uni-horned Canadian animal that actually exists and roams the frigid seas of the North. This club represents companies with $1B CAD valuations that started in 1999 or later.

While there are more than 40 unicorns in existence in the US, there are only four members of the Narwhal Club in Canada: Avigilon, Hootsuite, Slack, and Shopify. However, there are many companies getting close to breaking the ice – these are companies we consider to be emerging narwhals, with valuations in the hundreds of millions with great growth rates.

Some of these include Desire2Learn, Vision Critical, Redknee, Real Matters, iQmetrix, PointClickCare, BuildDirect, DWave, and Wattpad. 

We will be updating this list quarterly based on the latest public financing round available. If you know of a company that could fit either category, contact us here. Alternatively, connect with us below.

Larger Image

narwhal-club-1-billion-dollar-canadian-tech-companies

test-php-789