Economic Outlook

Peddling Fiction, Ignoring Fact

 
In his seventh, and final, State of the Union address this January, President Obama, clearly looking to bolster his legacy as the president who vanquished the Great Recession, boldly asserted that “Anyone claiming that America’s economy is in decline is peddling fiction.”  Unfortunately for the President, more and more Americans seem to believe (with an adequate basis in proof) that the fiction is emanating from the White House.
 

It’s hard to imagine how anyone can really assert with a straight face that the economy is currently “strong.” The most recent Gross Domestic Product (GDP), from 4th Quarter 2015, shows us barely inching along at a 1% annualized growth rate (Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2/26/16). Given that moderate growth used to be measured in the 3%-4% range, and that recent declines in the trade balance could further subtract from both 4th (2015) and 1st quarter GDP, we could be forgiven for raising an eyebrow or two in reaction to Obama’s boast. 
 For the President and his boosters, last week’s February non-farm payroll report, which showed 242,000 new jobs created and an unemployment rate below the crucial 5% level (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 3/4/16), provided proof that the Administration’s  economic policies, whatever they may actually be, are working. By beating the 190,000 consensus forecast for February of economists surveyed by Reuters, and revising upward the low 151,000 jobs previously reported in January to 172,000 (BLS, 3/4/16), the government was able to point to two months that averaged north of 200,000 new jobs.
 
The good news prompted Obama to invite reporters into a Cabinet meeting to crow about the results and to shame those who somehow remain skeptical, saying (to paraphrase) “America’s businesses are creating jobs at the fastest pace since the 1990s…and I don’t expect…this evidence to convince some…to change their doomsday rhetoric.”(The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, 3/4/16) He’s right on that point, the gloom should remain. Yes, the economy is creating jobs, but they are not the kind that can bring us back to the days of solid growth. The more important fact, which Obama did not mention, was that the report showed one of the largest drops in weekly earnings ever reported. It’s too bad that our media seems to be incapable of noticing such a tremendous problem right below the surface. 
 
One month ago, the January jobs report was enlivened by a healthy .5% jump in average hourly earnings. At the time, I argued that such good news would be a one-time event as it resulted from the increases in minimum wages that kicked in at the start of the year in many states across the country. As predicted, the momentum was fleeting. In February, average hourly earnings did not increase the .2% that was expected, but fell .1%. The drop may not seem like much, but it is the first decline since December 2014, and one of only six declines in the past ten years, according to BLS data. Making matters worse, average hours worked declined from 34.6 hours to 34.4. Combining falling wages and falling hours translated into a .7% decline in weekly earnings, the biggest drop ever measured in that statistic. (BLS, 3/4/16) For some reason Obama let that one slide.
 

The truth is that the big numbers in job creation do not reflect healthy economic growth but a fundamental shift in the labor force away from high-paying, full-time jobs to low-paying, part-time jobs. The February “household” survey of job creation shows that 78% of the jobs created were part-time, and 82% of those were in the low-paying service industries such as food service and retail. This partially explains February’s data that shows exports at the lowest level in almost five years. It’s hard to export the things created by bartenders and waiters. Meanwhile, we lost much higher-paying full time jobs in manufacturing, mining, and logging that would have produced things capable of being exported. Yes jobs are being created, but only at the expense of higher-paying jobs that are being destroyed. (BLS, 3/4/16)
 

Most observers assumed that the February Challenger Job Cut Report (released the day before non-farm payrolls) would be a big improvement over the very large 75,000 layoff figure posted in January. And while the 61,000 layoffs announced in February was an improvement, it was not nearly as much as observers had hoped. Averaging the two months puts the current pace for announced layoffs at 32% higher than the same period last year. Also, last week, the PMI Service Index, which came in at 53.2 in January, came in at 49.7 in February, showing actual contraction (below 50), (joining the smaller manufacturing sector, which has been contracting for months). 
 
Companies have been incentivized to cut their full-time work force by a variety of costly and burdensome regulations that are largely the result of the Obama Administration. If a company replaces a full-time worker with two part-time workers, the statistics count that as a job gain. But this only holds up if you count quantity while ignoring quality. The view from the street looks quite different, as workers prefer one good job to several bad ones. This is why rallies for Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are so well-attended. The underemployed are fed up with platitudes from the elites and they flock to these outsider candidates, who seem to understand their pain. 
 
It appears that investors are no longer signing up for the optimism either. Normally, a much stronger than expected non-farm payroll report would have ignited a market rally, but this one ignited a rally in gold, which at one point neared a high of $1,280 per ounce (gold was up 3% for the week). The strong jobs report should have convinced investors that the Fed would raise rates, which would hurt gold. But that didn’t happen. The markets have started to figure out that the jobs numbers are meaningless and that soon they will roll over to mirror all the bad data emanating from other sources.
 
I don’t expect that the President will ever officially acknowledge that the economy has weakened, let alone relapsed into recession. He has walked out too far on his rhetorical branch to walk it back. As a lame duck, he really has no incentive to do so. Such admissions would also undercut the campaign of Hillary Clinton,who is running as the logical successor to carry his torch.
 
But Janet Yellen is in a very difficult spot. If she continues to ignore the growing signs of recession, she runs the risk of letting one develop prior to the election. This would favor the Republican challenger, whether that is Donald Trump or Ted Cruz, neither of whom would be inclined to reappoint her as Fed Chairwoman, if elected. Allowing the Greenspan bubble to bust on Bush’s watch sealed John McCain’s fate, allowing Obama to ride a wave of voter outrage into the White House in 2008. Yellen does not want Trump to catch a similar wave in 2016.
 
As a result, I expect the Fed to soften its rhetoric in the very near future. They will promise that the punch bowl is going to remain on the table for the foreseeable future. This means that market movements that have defined 2016 thus far may accelerate in the months ahead, and may provide relief for investors in commodities and foreign currencies who have had the patience to wait out the nonsense.
 
Subscribe to Euro Pacific’s Weekly Digest: Receive all commentaries by Peter Schiff, John Browne, and other Euro Pacific commentators delivered to your inbox every Monday!

  1. The gold price action continues to look spectacular, as the rally gains both technical and fundamental momentum. Please click here now. Double-click to enlarge this beautiful daily gold chart.
  2. Gold has staged a majestic upside breakout, as I predicted it would, from an important symmetrical triangle pattern. The upside fun continues this morning, with the world’s ultimate asset rising overnight again, in solid Asian trading.
  3. My $1320 target is coming closer. 
  4. From a fundamental perspective, it’s important to understand the difference between the gold market now, and during the 2009 – 2011 rally.
  5. Institutional buyers then tended to be leveraged hedge funds. They believed Ben Bernanke’s QE program would be inflationary, even though Ben himself stated it could be quite deflationary, which it was. For several years, I’ve suggested that the exit from QE and interest rate hikes will create all the inflation those hedge fund managers wanted to see. 
  6. That’s coming into play now, and value-oriented funds are eagerly buying gold. These are very strong hands. While I don’t engage in gold market price chasing, those who do so now don’t face anywhere near the risk they did before these powerful institutional buyers joined the “gold buying party”.
  7. If a Western gold investor has lots of precious metal sector investments now, they should not be greedy and buy more as the price rises. If they have none at all, they should definitely be a buyer right now, because they are in the company of deep-pocketed institutions. 
  8. These institutions appear to be committed to the precious metal asset class for the long term as a value play, and won’t be easily shaken from their positions for many years to come! Also, whether gold rises or falls now, those money managers will likely keep buying regularly. 
  9. Please click here now. Double-click to enlarge. That’s an eight hour bars chart of the US dollar versus the yen, and it looks technically ominous.
  10. A descending triangle is beginning to form, and that is occurring as gold has burst out of the bullish symmetrical triangle. 
  11. Gold is not likely to have a significant sell-off until the dollar can rally against the yen, and that looks unlikely right now.
  12. If the dollar breaks under the 111 level on that chart, it could be because Janet Yellen has raised rates again, creating another stock market panic, and more “risk-off” buying of the yen and gold! 
  13. More rate hikes will also move more money out of the Fed and into the commercial banking system. For commercial banks, fractional reserve banking rewards outweigh the risks of making new loans. They get “peanuts” in interest at the Fed, and as the banks move that money, it adds to inflation, creating even more concerns about inflation.
  14. Top institutional money managers know that Janet can only raise interest rates in a limited way, or it will create a debt crisis within the US government. Janet also uses Phillips Curve theory to argue that higher inflation boosts GDP.
  15. So, a limited number of rate hikes are likely, and real rates are likely to decline because of inflation that rises faster than her rate hikes, and that’s the ideal environment for gold! 
  16. Please click here now. Double-click to enlarge this important daily oil chart. Technically, oil may be ready to challenge the key downtrend line I’ve highlighted. The $40 price is a key psychological number as well, and if it is exceeded, I expect money managers to begin talking about inflation more aggressively. That should produce an acceleration in the already-substantial SPDR fund buying. There are now 793 tons in this important gold fund!
  17. Also, influential economist Jeff Currie of Goldman Sachs may have unleashed a tidal wave of institutional buying, when he recently stated that oil will lead the general commodity market into a new upcycle later this year.
  18. Institutions are committing money to the sector now as a percentage of new money they receive. That’s a very powerful force that can create higher prices for most commodities.
  19. Please click here now. Double-click to enlarge this short term chart of the Dow. Gold surged as global stock markets crashed after Janet’s first rate hike, but gold is surging again, as stock markets rally!
  20. Clearly, for the world’s ultimate asset, the rally is a “study in perfection”. All the lights are green! Please click here now. Double-click to enlarge. The Chinese stock market is forming a gargantuan inverse head & shoulders pattern. I’ve argued that Chinese leaders will be successful in leading the nation’s transition into a domestic consumption oriented economy, and this chart adds serious weight to my assertion.
  21. Chinese citizens like to buy a lot of gold when they prosper. Also, the Chinese stock market is highly correlated to general commodity markets, while the US stock market is highly correlated to printed money and low interest rates from the Fed.
  22. As Janet ends the printed money fun and hikes rates, I expect the Chinese stock market will diverge from the US market, and rally strongly while the US market may implode. Obviously, I invest where my mouth is, which is gold, silver, Chindian stock markets, and commodity stocks.
  23. Please click here now. Double-click to enlarge this phenomenal GDX weekly chart. 
  24. A huge inverse head and shoulders bottom pattern continues to get “sculpted” onto the chart. This is forming because of large institutional money manager liquidity flows coming into this great sector. The rally should continue until roughly the $23 area for GDX. From there, the right shoulder should form. At that point, I’m predicting an enormous rally begins, carrying GDX to beyond the $30 marker! 

Special Offer For Website Readers: Please send me an Email to freereports4@gracelandupdates.com and I’ll send you my free “Silver Stocks Shall Rock!” report. I cover 6 key silver stocks poised to lead the precious metal sector during the next key stage of the gold price rally, alongside with 3 great gold stocks that seem ready to join the upside fun! 

Thanks! 

Cheers

st

Stewart Thomson 

Graceland Updates 

Written between 4am-7am. 5-6 issues per week. Emailed at aprox 9am daily.

www.gracelandupdates.com  

www.gracelandjuniors.com

www.gutrader.com  

Email: stewart@gracelandupdates.com

Or: stewart@gutrader.com

7 Keys to Building a Culture of Innovation to Foster Sustainability

c2794b04-7787-4f0d-a027-f25ce7d5ce49“Live in the sunshine.  Swim in the sea.  Drink the wild air.” – Ralph Waldo Emerson 
You want your organization to thrive because it innovates, not innovate to survive.  By building a culture of innovation into the DNA of both your leadership and organization, you become more competitively positioned and create greater long-term value.  Leadership must be persistent, aggressive and focused while transforming the organization, so innovation becomes the way you are, not something you do.  

The 7 keys to building a culture of innovation to foster innovation are: Make innovation a strategic priority. Ensure you develop and implement a strategic plan to grow your organization, and make innovation a key priority within that plan.  Review and update the strategic plan regularly (no less than annually), ensure the organization is aligned with the achievement of the plan and consistently measure your progress against its goals. 

Communicate why innovation is a priority.  Communicate to all levels of your organization, so employees are aware of your plans, understand their roles, are committed to taking action and can define success.  Provide regular and meaningful updates on progress.  Be clear and transparent. Create a common language in order to achieve greater organizational cohesion. 
  
Implement a system that enables innovation. For an initiative to become successful, it will need a system to nurture, support and measure it. Pick a system that creates value, and can be scaled as you grow.  

Seek Inspiration and Ideas Elsewhere.  Get new and fresh ideas from other industries, cultures, companies, people, books, and events.  Go well outside your normal routine and circle to create a mind open to new and better opportunities.   Status Quo is not your friend.
 
Lead by example. Take the time to focus on becoming a better leader, so you can model the behaviors you expect of others, particularly during difficult or critical periods.  Nothing will make the cultural change more successful than this one act. Be persistent, be authentic and be open minded to opportunity.
 
Hire, train and build innovative talent. Make the recruitment and retention of key staff that support your innovation strategy a key priority.  Help your current staff to develop new skills and find the right way to contribute in a more innovative environment while hiring new staff that can fill the gaps and have the skills and abilities to drive innovation. Be consistently focused on market problems and customer needs.
 
Fail faster. Encourage more risk-taking and make failing for taking measured risks both acceptable and an opportunity.  Find ways to decrease the failure cycle time, which will drive new opportunities from the failures, and move the organization ahead faster. 

                Don’t innovate for the sake of it, rather use innovation as a core strategy to make your organization agile so it can encourage new ways of thinking, foster new technologies and attract the type of people that will ensure you remain a leader in sustainability.
 

The Perfect Storm in Oil Prices Will Hit in the Ides of March

40699While some business / economic publications, like NewsMax are saying that, “Oil is pulling away from the market’s biggest storm in seven years,” I say, “Don’t believe it.” Not for one second. The real storm begins near the middle of March.

Because people saw that the price of oil rose and stabilized in February and that stocks followed in lockstep, they were quick to conclude the worst is over. The final days of February were, in fact, nothing more than the calm before the main storm. People were, as usual, too quick to sigh in relief, and that relief is likely to make the upset even worse when they find out how wrong they were to think the worst is over. When people believe the worst is over, and suddenly things grow even worse than they already were, they are more likely to panic.

We have seen this pattern of human naiveté again and again during the so-called “recovery” from the Great Recession. What really happened in February was a little consolidation, as both oil and stock caught their breath after a long first leg down in prices, but the worst pressures that I’ve been predicting were never set to come in February, but to start in March.

I am amazed at how these publications continue parroting each other’s statements that the Saudis and Russians achieved a great agreement to resolve the problem of an oversupply of oil. While NewMax points out the many swings the argument took last month and even that the Saudis and Russians really only agreed not to make the problem worse, the article still seems to come down on the side that this agreement means the oil market has now stabilized and prices will rise to $40 a barrel very shortly.

As I’ve laid out in my last article (so won’t go into much detail here), the so-called “pact” between Saudi Arabia and Russia accomplished the exact opposite of what all the parrots are squawking about.

US oil production stays at forty-three year high

While Saudi Arabia and Russia actually teamed up to make it clear they will not reduce oil production by a single drop to help solve the oil supply problem, four OPEC members, other than Saudi Arabia, also agreed not to make any production cuts. So, oversupply is absolutely certain to continue.

What some people don’t realize is that the United States has actually been increasing production during this time. The last time the United States pumped at this present rate was 1972. US oil production has grown 82% since 2008, rising 8% last year alone.

Shale-oil producers may be holding up better than the Saudis anticipated because the major oil producers have the muscle and reserve to make it through the present price wars by changing the focus of their current business activities. They are finding bargains in drilling costs now as the smaller producers go out of work and people become willing to work for the major producers for less. This is a good time to drill new wells because drilling produces no oil anyway, making it a good time to devote money in that direction. In a large oil company’s planning, it is something that has to be done for future production, so ramp it now by focusing assets in that direction while the costs are lower, and you’ll be set to make big money when prices move back up and those wells become ready for actual production. All of which means, the major US oil companies are increasing their production capacity as the smaller companies around them fail. The failure of small companies also makes for a good time to get good prices on equipment.

It has never been the large oil producers that have been likely to go out of business. The problem is with the numerous small companies that cannot afford to weather a long storm. At least forty smaller companies have shut down since 2014. The rapid growth of many small contractors in the oil industry that fed the US job expansion during the “recovery” period will continue to shrivel, so this consolidation of businesses is bad news right at the heart of the “recovery.” The bonds they have used to finance their expansion will continue to go bust. Many jobs have already evaporated along with the small companies that have blown away in the dusty oil fields.

Not all major oil companies, however, are weathering the storm well. Oil production giant, Halliburton, for example, has already cut over 26,000 jobs since its 2014 peak. Halliburton speaks a very different story to the dominant theme in mainstream media that the worst is over:

“Our industry has turned down faster than anyone ever expected,” Halliburton CEO Dave Lesar and President Jeff Miller said in a memo to employees obtained by CNNMoney. The execs said it’s now clear that business opportunities will be “much worse than anticipated” coming into the year…. Halliburton has also attempted to cope with cheap oil by consolidating facilities in 20 countries and closing down operations altogether in another two countries. The oil downturn has sent Halliburton’s profits plunging. Its stock price has lost more than half its value since mid-2014 when crude prices peaked. – CNN Money

26,000 jobs cut by just one company is no small dent in the recovery, and Halliburton doesn’t sound like its outlook for the industry is as good now as it was at the start of the year.

In December, production rates finally did start to fall a little in the US as the toll taken by the initial storm finally started to become visible. Production rates are still falling. While the industry is finally starting to feel the crush, that’s not going to be enough reduction in production to help the price of oil in the near future. The US decline in production is minor so far, and the coming combined storms are major.

This month, three storms will converge upon those businesses who focus on the production side of oil.

March madness begins in the maintenance season for oil

I’ve been pointing out for the past couple of months that we were nearing the oil industry’s huge annual maintenance season. This month, we enter it. The big refineries typically shut down a number of operations in March, after heating oil demands and oil-fired electricity demands are down and before summer travel demands for gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel all rise, in order to make repairs throughout their refineries.

It’s a time when there is naturally less demand for oil, so the industries go into maintenance mode. The amount of refining that gets done this time of year drops. That means the backup of oil due to oversupply to the refineries should become worse this month.

It is during this time that I think oil prices could touch down into the high teens, causing more already-marginal companies to throw in the towel. Numerous small contractors in the oil business will find the toughening situation breaks them, and that means more failing bonds and more strained banks.


Shale Boom, Shale Bust: The Myth of Saudi America In 2014, something went terribly wrong with this rosy scenario of “Saudi America.” An unexpected collapse in the price of oil is bankrupting the oil patch, destroying jobs and threatening plans for a renewable energy future.


Iran marches on

Iran is marching forward without a flinch in its plans to ramp up oil production and sales to 2,000,000 barrels per day. They now anticipate hitting that number in March if you combine their crude and condensate sales (fine liquid oil that condenses out of natural gas). That is sooner than they projected a month ago.

While Saudi Arabia and Russia agreed not to expand production further, Iran now rightly points out that the talk of oil production cuts was always “a joke.” There was never a chance, as I also pointed out on this blog, that either the Saudis or the Russians were going to voluntarily cut production in the price war they are using to try to recover market share from rapidly expanding US producers. Their pact really says, “Oversupply will end when enough US companies go out of business.”

With Iran promising to expand production this month (and already succeeding in doing so), and with oil refineries not being able to do much refining, the backup of crude could get large enough to quickly reach the point where there are no tanks left for storing oil or natural gas. That is the major inflection point at which everyone will be forced to slow production temporarily but only because they cannot sell oil at all. I expect that major backup to cause the next severe downward leg in oil prices.

Stocks have been marching in lockstep, so they are likely to also plummet with the greater drop in the price of oil, causing the next leg in the crash of the stock market. As I’ve said all along, that crash will unfold in numerous downward legs, separated by smaller rallies, over the course of a year to a year-and-a-half.

Revelers during the Ides of March will be stunned

While many are blowing their party whistles on the oil-price-stabilization bandwagon, I do have some company in my dire predictions for a short-term oil price crash. Deloitte said in a report a week ago that 75% of oil exploration companies could default on their debt, ending in bankruptcy, where they either restructure their debts or, in the worst cases, go out of business.

Another person who sees the coming storm as I do is John Kilduff, founding partner of Again Capital, which specializes in energy trading:

We’re in the red zone, and we’re about to go over the goal line here for that actual pain point…. The rich are going to get richer, but companies like Chesapeake, unfortunately I think, is among the road kill, Goodrich Petroleum…. We are definitely going to see [$18/barrel oil]…. Now you’re seeing refineries go into maintenance…. Oil is going to back up big time in the system here. – Nightly Business Report

As I’ve said, the increased backup of oil will be caused by the perfect storm coming in on the convergence of three different fronts: 1) the agreement by Russia and Saudi Arabia to maintain full-tilt production converging with 2) the post-sanction arrival of Iran back into the marketplace just as 3) the oil industry goes into maintenance mode and so needs even less oil, not more.

Kilduff says he thinks BP is another company that is going to wind up deep enough in distress that it will be bought up by some other massive conglomerate. Kilduff also predicts Chesapeake — a major oil producer and the second largest natural gas producer in the US — will go under. Chesapeake lost more than $14 billion last year on the downturn. It says it will sell off many of its assets this year to pay down its debts. So, the major fire sales are also beginning.

According to Kilduff, we are, just this month, reaching that ultimate pain point. A desert storm is gathering over the oil fields.

Refugees: Austria & 9 Balkan Countries Tell Merkel “Go to Hell”

UnknownThe decision by Austria and nine Balkan states to unilaterally choke off the flow of migrants across their borders has prompted fury in Berlin, which fears it could torpedo Chancellor Merkel’s drive for an EU-wide solution to the refugee crisis. The countries all restrict the number of refugees they will take. Merkel is furious but there is not a damn thing she can do about it.

….read more HERE

test-php-789