Gold & Precious Metals
Cosmos Chiu, executive director of precious metals equity research at CIBC World Markets, doesn’t just stick to mining companies in North America. About one-third of gold comes from Africa, Chiu says in this interview with The Gold Report, so he likes to dedicate a similar amount of coverage to companies there. But knowing what to look for in intriguing districts around the world is what sets Chiu apart—that and his decidedly bullish forecast for the gold price.
The Gold Report: Cosmos, with U.S. economic data putting pressure on gold and silver prices, Moody’s is forecasting an average of $1,100/ounce ($1,100/oz) for gold in 2014 with almost identical all-in gold production costs. Bank of America Merrill Lynch is forecasting an average of $1,150/oz. What’s your view?
Cosmos Chiu: The U.S. economic data is nothing new. Last year certainly wasn’t the best for gold. However, the bad news has already been priced in. We’ve seen some pretty robust U.S. data come out first thing in 2014 and gold prices have held up at the $1,200/oz level.
CIBC has an average gold price for 2014 of $1,350/oz, which is predicated on robust Asian demand for physical gold. An all-in gold production cost of $1,100/oz is pretty realistic from our perspective.
We have wide-ranging coverage at CIBC from gold mining companies to royalty companies. Yes, there will be some companies in trouble. Investors have to be pretty picky about where they invest. They need to focus on the companies that have strong balance sheets and the flexibility to cut costs and focus on the cash cost.
TGR: Most people would say that $1,350/oz is quite bullish.
CC: It’s not conservative. Is it overly bullish? I think it’s doable.
TGR: We will soon see Q4/13 earnings reports from gold producers. Will those reports show investors that gold producers can still perform with gold hovering around $1,225/oz?
CC: We’ve seen glimpses of what Q4/13 could look like through production reports. It’s becoming a market where there are good producers and there are bad producers. The difference is especially visible right now. For the better producers, some will continue to see cash costs come down. We saw that in Q3 versus Q2. I would expect that to happen again. The better producers will continue to make money even at today’s gold price.
TGR: What are some names that could surprise?
CC: Q4/13 is going to be a lot cleaner than what we saw earlier this year with the write-downs. It might even be a little bit boring which, to be honest, is a good thing. Companies will be able to prove that they can make money. It won’t be one of those noisy, messy quarters that we saw earlier last year.
Looking into 2014, I like Franco-Nevada Corp. (FNV:TSX; FNV:NYSE), Osisko Mining Corp. (OSK:TSX)and Eldorado Gold Corp. (ELD:TSX; EGO:NYSE). These three companies exhibit the ability to excel, even at today’s gold price.
On the lower end of the cost curve, I like Franco-Nevada; it doesn’t really have operating costs at all. It has quite a few accretive acquisition opportunities in the current environment for gold producers.
Osisko fits into a theme of seeking a stronger balance sheet. Things are stabilizing and even optimizing at the Canadian Malartic mine. It’s generating positive free cash flow and there’s optionality. If the gold price environment is supportive once again, and it will be, then there will be a lot of organic growth opportunities within that portfolio. That gives investors that upside potential, as seen by Goldcorp Inc.’s (G:TSX; GG:NYSE) bid.
Eldorado has always been one of the lowest-cost producers no matter how you dice it. It’s got one of the better growth profiles and has a very strong balance sheet.
TGR: Osisko is based in Canada and Mexico. Eldorado is mostly Turkey, Greece, China and South America. Franco-Nevada is everywhere. This is a still a risk-adverse market where most precious metals analysts are sticking to safe mining jurisdictions like Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.
About 30% of your coverage, however, includes names that primarily or exclusively operate in Africa. Why do you lean heavily on equities with key assets in Africa?
CC: I try to give broad coverage to the different areas in the world where gold is produced. Looking at the world, about one-quarter to one-third of the gold production is coming from Africa. A lot of Africa’s production is coming from South Africa. I try to pick out the better or more prospective parts for future growth. Mainly, that’s coming from West Africa.
TGR: Can you tell us about some of the companies that you cover?
CC: Teranga Gold Corp. (TGZ:TSX; TGZ:ASX) recently signed an agreement to sell a gold production stream to royalty titan Franco-Nevada for $135 million ($135M). Teranga management said it would use the cash to purchase the remaining interest in the Oromin Joint Venture Group. I upgraded Teranga’s shares from sector performer to sector outperformer on the back of that news.
This is a story that I’ve followed for a long time. There are a lot of synergies to be realized. The Oromin Joint Venture partnership no longer has to build a second mill. Despite Teranga now selling some of the upside off to Franco-Nevada, my net asset value still increased by about 40%.
TGR: It also consolidates the exploration potential of that area, which is a 60-kilometer strike.
CC: It just makes sense to have the two companies together.
TGR: On the other side of that deal is Franco-Nevada. It recently had a market cap of $6.5 billion. Does the deal impact Franco-Nevada’s bottom-line in any tangible way?
CC: It adds good cash flow in the near term. Franco-Nevada is getting in from day one. There’s a lot of potential for future production increases. Teranga could grow into a cornerstone royalty. Franco-Nevada offers a diversified portfolio. It’s everywhere. It’s a less risky way to get involved in the gold space, but at the same time get that upside when gold prices go higher.
TGR: Franco-Nevada’s purchase price per ounce is set at 20% of the spot price. Doesn’t that really speak to the management at Franco-Nevada and its shrewd negotiating tactics?
CC: It’s the first time I’ve seen a structure at 20%. Most royalty deals are set at $400/oz or $500/oz. The financials on this deal are a little bit more favorable to Franco-Nevada. However, I don’t believe that Teranga would have gotten a deal done with OJVG if not for Franco-Nevada. That’s how it works out to be a win-win situation.
TGR: What are the most likely performers among the other companies that you cover that operate in Africa?
CC: I have two sector outperformers in my West African universe: Teranga and SEMAFO Inc. (SMF:TSX; SMF:OMX) in Burkina Faso. SEMAFO’s flagship mine is Mana. What’s most exciting about SEMAFO these days is that it made the Siou discovery, which is scheduled to be in production midway through 2014. It’s going to be a satellite deposit, which means there won’t be a lot of capital expenditure (capex) involved.
The great thing about Siou is that the grade is about twice as high, at 4+ grams/ton (4+ g/t), as the Wona-Kona pit, which has been in production for several years. There’s not a lot of capex. It’s feeding higher-grade material through the mill, so we expect costs to come down and production to increase.
TGR: You also cover a number of companies operating in Canada. In a recent research report you praised Osisko Mining for its Q3/13 performance, which met most of the Street’s expectations. Not far away at another low-grade, high-tonnage open-pit mine, Detour Gold Corp. (DGC:TSX) shut down its mill in December as it attempted to work out the kinks in production. What’s your prognosis for Detour? Will it get this thing on track?
CC: I would consider the problems with Detour to be teething issues. It’s good that you brought up Osisko. It has had its share of issues in the past as well. Given the size of these operations—Detour included—it takes time. I firmly believe that as Detour opens up the pit and continues to work out the teething issues at the mill, it should meet what it has set out to do when it first engineered the mine. It’s certainly got a lot of people worried about the financial position of the company. It doesn’t help that there’s been a changeover in management. However, all in all, it’s just a timing thing. Detour should work out.
TGR: Detour has published production guidance of 457,000 oz in 2014 at cash costs of $945/oz. Is that realistic?
CC: I think it is realistic because those are my numbers. If we annualize what happened in Q4/13, even with the two-week shutdown in December, Detour would work out to something that’s close to that. There were signs in Q4/13 that point to its ability to meet that guidance in 2014.
TGR: There’s a technical report that’s scheduled to be out this quarter on Detour Lake. What are you expecting from that?
CC: I’m expecting a fine-tuning of 2014 numbers. Detour had difficulty meeting 2013 guidance. It learned quite a bit about mining rates, which should be factored into the new mine plan. If I recall correctly, based on an old technical report, 2014 grades were expected to increase to 0.98 g/t. My expectation for 2014 would be less than that. Based on this new knowledge, the company will likely put out a fine-tuned number.
TGR: You recently rerated Lake Shore Gold Corp. (LSG:TSX) from a sector underperform to a sector perform. Is that based on its record production in 2014?
CC: I’ve followed this story for a long time and things are finally turning the corner. We saw its cash balance increase from $15M to $34M between Q3/13 and Q4/13. Lake Shore increased the grade profile for three consecutive quarters. It set targets that are reachable for 2014 that would represent another 20% increase in production between 2013 and 2014. It’s no longer a sector underperformer; things are looking much better.
TGR: If you could, please leave our readers with an investable theme or two to chew on.
CC: Focus on the companies that have a stronger balance sheet, stable operations and growth potential.
TGR: Thanks, Cosmos.
Cosmos Chiu, director of Precious Metals Equity Research, CIBC World Markets, joined CIBC in June 2006 to provide coverage of development and production-stage companies in the gold sector, as well as royalty companies. Chiu has a specific focus on mining assets in North America, Europe and Africa, covering companies with market capitalizations ranging from $200 million to $10 billion. He was ranked fifth overall best stock picker by Starmine in 2010. He is consistently ranked in the top 10 in the Brendon Wood International survey for the Precious Metals—Small/Mid Cap sector.
Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.
DISCLOSURE:
1) Brian Sylvester conducted this interview for The Gold Report and provides services toThe Gold Report as an independent contractor..
2) Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services or as sponsorship payment.
3) Cosmos ChinI was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.
4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent.
5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legaldisclaimer.
6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.
Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2014 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.
Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.
Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.
Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.
Precious Metals Sector New Uptrend – Juniors to Lead the Charge
Posted by Clive Maund
on Monday, 3 February 2014 19:41
We sold our Precious Metals sector holdings on Monday 27th January, which we had bought just a few weeks earlier, in order to sidestep a possible reaction. The reason for this was that both gold and silver had arrived at important trendline resistance and some of our juniors had become critically overbought after strong gains. Were we correct to sell at that point, in view of the building major uptrend across the sector?
The answer to that question depends on what you are looking at. With respect to gold and silver and leveraged ETFs in them, the answer is yes, as they have reacted back, although, thus far at least, the reaction back in gold is not large. With respect to stocks the picture is mixed as while most have reacted back, others have stood still and some have even started higher over the past several days. These latter may be “jumping the gun” however, as gold and silver have yet to break out of their downtrends.
The purpose of this article is to paint as complete and accurate a picture as possible of where we stand right now with respect to the outlook for gold and silver, Precious Metals stocks, and the broad stockmarket, before then going on to list, for subscribers, the strongest junior mining stocks then can be expected to race ahead once gold and silver do break out to the upside.
Let’s start with gold. Our 8-month chart makes plain why we sold a week ago – it had then arrived at a classic target at the upper boundary of its intermediate downtrend in force from last August. It has since started to turn down again, and, with its moving averages still in bearish alignment, the probability is considered high that it will now react further towards the key support shown near its late June lows – but it shouldn’t drop below these lows. One possibility that we should be aware of is that a small Head-and-Shoulders bottom has been forming in gold from mid-November. If true then gold could turn up soon and break out from the downtrend, perhaps without dropping back any further.
The 2-year for gold is interesting as it shows that the situation is becomes technically “tight” with the price being squeezed into a corner between its falling downtrend line and the horizontal support originating at the June – July lows. Since these lines are rapidly converging it follows that we must have resolution of the current standoff soon, within 2 months absolute maximum, which will end with either a breakdown to lower levels, or a breakout marking the start of the major uptrend that we are expecting for reasons that will become clear as we continue. The 2-year chart also shows to advantage the potential Double Bottom that is completing with the June – July lows.
The long-term 14-year chart for gold makes it very clear why it is at an excellent point to turn up, after its gruelling reaction of the past several years – it appears to be basing just above its long-term uptrend line. You can argue until the cows come home about the reasons for this long and deep reaction, but one thing is clear – while it was going on an awful lot of gold has made the long journey from western countries, whose banks are anxious to see a low gold price, to eastern powers like China who are going to sit on it, and probably use it to back their currencies when western currencies fail.
Turning now to silver we can see on its 8-month chart that it has been considerably weaker than gold in the recent past, as after nudging sideways towards its downtrend line and finally touching it, it has dropped away and looks like it is headed for the support shown near the June – July lows, which is not far beneath and possibly lower to the trendline support shown on the 14-year chart farther down the page.
As with gold, the 2-year chart shows the silver price being forced into a corner by the descending trendline converging with the horizontal support level, which will force either a breakdown or a breakout, within a little over 2 months, maximum.
Unlike gold, silver has not yet arrived at its long-term uptrend support line shown on its 14-year chart, although it is already dug into strong support. What this means is that there is some chance that it will break below its June – July lows short-term before it turns up again, perhaps bottoming at about $16.50 – $17. Thus we should not be fooled in the event that it does break below its June- July lows, as any such move is likely to be “false” and followed by a rapid reversal to the upside.
Turning now to mining stocks we see on the 2-year chart for the GDX ETF, which is a useful proxy, that it stalled after hitting its downtrend line a week ago, and may now react back some, especially as its moving averages are still in bearish alignment. However, this is not a weak chart. The marked convergence of the downtrend is strongly bullish, and the persistent high volume of recent months is a sign that it has been bottoming. It could now break out at any time, although our assessment is that a (probably minor) reaction is likely first. Other stocks indices like the HUI and XAU are already verging on breakouts, although so far by an unconvincing margin, so they could drop back.
Now this is where things start to get really interesting, for as we can see on the 2-year chart for the GDXJ, which is the ETF for the juniors, it has risen quite strongly this year, but unlike the larger stocks, it has risen on big record volume, which is a sure sign of a trend change. We had observed in mid-late December that the better junior mining stocks were absurdly oversold, and went ahead and bought a raft of them, which worked out very well. Juniors outperformed other larger mining stocks in the rally of recent weeks and dramatically outperformed gold. What we can infer from this is that juniors are going to lead stocks which are going to lead gold (and silver) in the early stages of the upcoming major sector uptrend, so if you are out to make as much money as possible this is where you should be. The fundamental reason for this simple – after being trampled into the dust, juniors mining stocks are amongst the most undervalued stocks it is possible to buy. Therefore when the sector recovers, the best of them are going to make stellar recovery moves. These are the ones which we are going to focus on in the early stages of the sector uptrend.
The following 8-month chart of the GDXJ over gold shows the dramatic outperformance of juniors relative to gold on the recent runup, and makes it abundantly plain why they are the place to be during the early stages of the expected major PM sector uptrend.
If you have read all of the above you will know exactly where we stand in relation to the upcoming sector uptrend, and why juniors look set to – and already are – leading the charge. Don’t be put off the best ones by them looking expensive compared to a month or so ago, although we may see better prices soon as detailed above – the sharp advance is a sign of strength, and if you think they look expensive on short-term charts, trying looking at their long-term charts and you should see that they have much further to go. Also, don’t make the mistake of buying the ones that haven’t moved on the grounds that they are cheaper – if they didn’t move, it’s probably for a reason – that they are duds, saddled with huge unpayable debts or whatever.
Alright, that’s enough of the theory, time to get practical. Here’s the list of the strongest junior Precious Metals stocks….
More follows for subscribers… http://www.clivemaund.com
In my previous article, “Gold, Bottom or Bounce”, I displayed a chart that accurately predicted a high probability bottom in Gold on Dec 30 with an uptick confirmation on Dec 31, and that Gold was about to undergo a very substantial rally. However, there were other reasons for displaying that particular chart that will now become apparent when you look at it below.
….read more HERE
Marc Faber : Where Gold is Headed?? Marc Faber appears on Bloomberg business where he discusses the ongoing market bubble. He see’s a QE4 and QE5 coming. Also he believes the dollar is going much lower and gold much higher.
We are about to witness the sad, but inevitable conclusion, from having a global economic system that is based on fiat currencies. This global experiment in which the quantity of money and credit is left to the discretion of just a few unaccountable individuals is about to come to a disastrous end.
It took a few but decades to reach crescendo, but the end of the Bretton Woods monetary system in 1971 has now led to catastrophic levels of debt and inflation across the developed world. The corrupt business cycle goes like this: Politicians and bankers desire to spend and create more money than what a genuine economy’s savings (through productivity and increased labor force) can generate. Government and private bank interference in the market place continues to grow through the process of increasing the amount of aggregate debt outstanding. When this process goes unchecked for several decades-as is the case in Japan, Europe and the U.S.-debt levels become so onerous that it demands interest rates remain near zero percent in order for the economy to function.
These zombie-like economies cannot grow in a healthy manner because they suffer from: asset bubbles; high inflation; interest rate volatility; currency instability; along with high levels of corruption, regulations and taxation. Therefore, the prescription offered by politicians is more government spending and further central bank intervention in money supply growth and interest rate manipulation.
A great example of the bankrupt economic ideas adopted by these money printers, is the philosophy known as “Beggar Thy Neighbor”; a process in which governments and central bankers try to achieve a competitive trading advantage through the process of destroying the purchasing power of their currencies through inflation. Despite the overwhelming evidence that getting a nation deeply involved into a love affair with inflation does nothing in the way of improving economic growth, it is widely embraced today as a viable method of improving output.
The Plaza Accord of 1985 was an agreement between the U.S. and four of its largest export destinations to dramatically lower the value of the dollar. As a direct result of this agreement, the U.S. dollar lost over 50% of its value against the Yen from 1985 to 1987. Yet, the trade deficit increased from $121.8 billion in ’85, to $151.6 billion a full two years after the devastation to the dollar began. Likewise, there was no improvement in manufacturing as a percentage of the economy either. Manufacturing represented 17.8% of GDP in 1985, and it fell to 17.4% of GDP at the end of 1987.
In another example of the failure of inflation and money printing to fix anything, in 2005 China announced it would increase the value of its currency and abandon its decade-old fixed exchange rate to the U.S. dollar in favor of a link to a basket of world currencies (the U.S. had been pressing for the Chinese to allow a weaker dollar for years and they finally acquiesced). During that time frame, the Yuan rallied from .1208 USD to .1467 USD (a move of over 20%). But the falling dollar had a negligible effect on U.S. exports. For all of 2005 the U.S. deficit with China was $201.5 billion. In 2008, three years into the dollar devaluation and Yuan appreciation, it soared to $266.3 billion (more than a 32% increase). The truth is that inflation and currency destruction makes trade and current account deficits worse not better.
Finally, the new regime of Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is also a wonderful example of the doomed policies that promote inflation and currency debauchery. By late 2012, he deployed Abenomics into full effect-the practice of massively increasing; government debt, central bank money printing and currency destruction. The Yen has lost 25% of its value against the dollar so far to date and Abenomics has made the Japanese currency a joke among international traders. Nonetheless, in January of this year their current account deficit soared to an all-time record high 592.8 billion Yen, or $5.7 billion.
So let’s set the record straight. If crumbling a nation’s currency was the pathway to prosperity then all banana republics would soon become manufacturing and economic powerhouses. But that never happens.
Trying to boost manufacturing and GDP growth by lowering the purchasing power of a currency does not “Beggar Thy Neighbor”, but instead bankrupts thyself. It does this by destroying the middle class, discouraging foreign direct investments, disincentives productivity gains and creates damaging imbalances in the economy. These imbalances eventually lead to intractable levels of debt, uncontrollable inflation and unmanageable debt service payments.
The systemic practice of running economies on the spurious belief that inflation and currency devaluation is a necessary pursuit is about to reveal its devastating consequences on a global scale. I expect volatility in global markets similar to what was experienced during 2008 to occur in the middle of this year, as economies experience massive swings between inflation and deflation.
Pento Portfolio Strategies turned decidedly bearish on the economy last week – moving investors into cash, gold and shorting the Japanese market. If you would like to hear more about our investment ideas, call his executive assistant Allison Fleck at 732-772-9500 extension 1 to set up an appointment to speak with Michael directly.
Pento Portfolio Strategies
291 Rt. 34 North Suite D
Colts Neck NJ 07722
Justine Coleman
Pento Portfolio Strategies, LLC
Information presented is for educational purposes only. Moreover, no viewer or listener should assume that any information or discussion presented, serve as the receipt of or substitute for, personalized advice from Pento Portfolio Strategies, LLC or from any other investment professional and is not included as an offer of solicitation for the sale or purchase of any specific securities, investments or investment strategies.
-
I know Mike is a very solid investor and respect his opinions very much. So if he says pay attention to this or that - I will.
~ Dale G.
-
I've started managing my own investments so view Michael's site as a one-stop shop from which to get information and perspectives.
~ Dave E.
-
Michael offers easy reading, honest, common sense information that anyone can use in a practical manner.
~ der_al.
-
A sane voice in a scrambled investment world.
~ Ed R.
Inside Edge Pro Contributors
Greg Weldon
Josef Schachter
Tyler Bollhorn
Ryan Irvine
Paul Beattie
Martin Straith
Patrick Ceresna
Mark Leibovit
James Thorne
Victor Adair