Daily Updates

Important Update on Gold and Silver & The 200-Day M.A. Gold B.S. …

The 200-Day M.A. Gold B.S. 

by Peter Grandich of Grandich.com

If I had a dollar for every commentary about how gold is finished now that the 200-Day M.A. has been broken to the downside.

Such a feat has occurred before in the “Mother” of all gold bull markets. 

gold-200day

I only hope it’s as finished as all the other times noted above! (click on image or HERE for larger chart)

 

Important Update on Gold & Silver 

by Larry Edelson of Uncommon Wisdom

Gold has plunged through many of the support levels I’ve previously provided you. It’s dropped through the $1,730 level … the $1,610 level … and has thus far reached as low as $1,564.

Once it closes below $1,610 on a Friday, which it will likely have done before you even read this column — the stage will be set for gold to collapse to at least $1,435 and, very possibly, as low as the $1,100 mark.

And silver, precisely as I’ve been warning you, has started to crash again — losing more than $4 last week and shattering support at the $30 level … then the $29.16 level — and is now ready to make a beeline down to $25 and, very possibly, much lower to $22 to $23 an ounce.

As a result, suggestions I made previously to purchase inverse ETFs such as the ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and the ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) are now paying off very nicely. GLL has already soared as much as 29.8%. ZSL, as much as 37.8%.

I’ve taken a lot of flak over the last couple of months for being bearish on commodities, especially because of my forecast for much-lower prices for gold and silver. Some even treated me as if I were some kind of traitor.

But that’s OK. I will never succumb to the crowd that believes markets can go up forever and that bull markets always have blue skies overhead. I’ve been around too long to fall into that trap, which causes nothing but blindness and losses.

And most importantly, I will never, ever tell you anything but what I believe … or what my indicators tell me. I can assure you that I’ll never report on what anyone wants to hear.

There are way too many pundits in this business who tell you what you want to hear, all in the hope of keeping you as a customer or a subscriber. Not me. I refuse to do anything but report on what I see … and what I would do with my own money.

Are the Precious Metals
Really Losing Their Luster?

So why are gold and silver falling? Why could they fall much more? Why are they plunging in the face of a crisis as bad as Europe’s?

This is where you need to separate fact from fiction, and use critical thinking skills to understand markets. And the truth is that most gold (and other metals) bugs don’t have a clue when it comes to what really drives the precious metals.

They figure gold and silver are all about inflation. When inflation is escalating, gold and silver do well. Sounds good, right?

But nothing could be further from the truth! Inflation is a very minor force driving the prices of gold and silver. And at that, inflation isn’t even a force. Rather, it’s a symptom of a much-deeper issue, which is none other than what I call a “crisis in confidence.” That’s the true underlying force behind the precious metals’ behavior.

Simply put, when confidence in government or in fiat currency is falling, precious metals do well regardless of whether inflation is at hand or not!

Once you understand that, then you have a better understanding on what really drives gold and silver.

But that’s not nearly enough either. You have to delve deeper and determine where the crisis in confidence is manifesting itself.

Right now, the crisis in confidence is clearly in Europe. Though the United States certainly has many problems — many of them bigger than those affecting Europe — right now, it’s all about Europe, and it’s making the United States look like an island of safety.

Put another way, plunging confidence in Europe is bolstering the United States and, most importantly, the U.S. dollar. Since the euro is NOT the world’s reserve currency, that means that the capital that’s fleeing Europe right now is heading, guess where?

To the U.S. dollar, for safety and liquidity … which is, by default, bearish for the precious metals.

Should You Get Sold
On Selling Silver, Gold?

So you see, plunging gold and silver prices are not so hard to understand when you delve a little deeper and view the world in international terms and with no biases.

No biases about inflation, one currency or another, what markets can or cannot do. Just pure, simple, logical reasoning — unaffected by emotion. That’s all it takes.

Don’t get me wrong. There will come a time when a massive crisis in confidence hits the United States. The time is coming, and that is when you will see the next leg down in the U.S. dollar and the next big bull market in precious metals. But it is not here yet!

Which is precisely why I continue to recommend that all precious metals investors be very careful now. Gold and silver can fall much further than you think possible.

And odds are they will. Because their next bull market legs higher will likely not form until most gold and silver investors have thrown in the towel, and there are very few left to sell. That’s when the precious metals will violently turn back to the upside, leaving most investors in the dust.

If you’ve acted on my suggestions to hedge your gold holdings, or take outright speculative positions in inverse ETFs like those mentioned earlier, hold those positions. There’s a lot more downside potential in gold and silver right now.

Ditto for most commodities. As Europe continues to go down in flames, capital will pour out of Europe and into the U.S. dollar for cash and liquidity purposes … boosting the dollar higher, and forcing the prices of nearly all commodities lower.

My Real Wealth Report members have been way ahead of these moves, and I’ve had them hedge up their gold holdings and take some speculative short positions well ahead of time, and they’re doing great.

My more-speculative service, Resource Windfall Trader, is doing fantastic. Every one of my closed trades over the last 12 consecutive months has seen an average 45% gain in market price. That includes all seven of my losing trades over the last year.

The average hold time for those trades is just 44 days — or about a month and a half. Some examples include big wins such as 233.3% gains on a bearish gold position … 118% and 354% on a bearish silver bet … and much more, including 101.85% gains on a bearish S&P 500 play.

You might want to consider cranking up your profit potential by becoming a member of my Resource Windfall Trader. You can do so now at a full 30% off the regular membership price by clicking here toread my special report.

Best wishes, as always …

Larry

 

Larry Edelson has nearly 33 years of investing experience with a focus in the precious metals and natural resources markets. His Real Wealth Report (a monthly publication) and Resource Windfall Trader (weekly) provide a continuing education on natural resource investments, with recommendations aiming for both profit and risk management.

For more information on Real Wealth Report, click here.
For more information on Resource Windfall Trader, click here.



Important Update on Gold & Silver 

by Larry Edelson of Uncommon Wisdom

Gold has plunged through many of the support levels I’ve previously provided you. It’s dropped through the $1,730 level … the $1,610 level … and has thus far reached as low as $1,564.

Once it closes below $1,610 on a Friday, which it will likely have done before you even read this column — the stage will be set for gold to collapse to at least $1,435 and, very possibly, as low as the $1,100 mark.

And silver, precisely as I’ve been warning you, has started to crash again — losing more than $4 last week and shattering support at the $30 level … then the $29.16 level — and is now ready to make a beeline down to $25 and, very possibly, much lower to $22 to $23 an ounce.

As a result, suggestions I made previously to purchase inverse ETFs such as the ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and the ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) are now paying off very nicely. GLL has already soared as much as 29.8%. ZSL, as much as 37.8%.

I’ve taken a lot of flak over the last couple of months for being bearish on commodities, especially because of my forecast for much-lower prices for gold and silver. Some even treated me as if I were some kind of traitor.

But that’s OK. I will never succumb to the crowd that believes markets can go up forever and that bull markets always have blue skies overhead. I’ve been around too long to fall into that trap, which causes nothing but blindness and losses.

And most importantly, I will never, ever tell you anything but what I believe … or what my indicators tell me. I can assure you that I’ll never report on what anyone wants to hear.

There are way too many pundits in this business who tell you what you want to hear, all in the hope of keeping you as a customer or a subscriber. Not me. I refuse to do anything but report on what I see … and what I would do with my own money.

Are the Precious Metals
Really Losing Their Luster?

So why are gold and silver falling? Why could they fall much more? Why are they plunging in the face of a crisis as bad as Europe’s?

This is where you need to separate fact from fiction, and use critical thinking skills to understand markets. And the truth is that most gold (and other metals) bugs don’t have a clue when it comes to what really drives the precious metals.

They figure gold and silver are all about inflation. When inflation is escalating, gold and silver do well. Sounds good, right?

But nothing could be further from the truth! Inflation is a very minor force driving the prices of gold and silver. And at that, inflation isn’t even a force. Rather, it’s a symptom of a much-deeper issue, which is none other than what I call a “crisis in confidence.” That’s the true underlying force behind the precious metals’ behavior.

Simply put, when confidence in government or in fiat currency is falling, precious metals do well regardless of whether inflation is at hand or not!

Once you understand that, then you have a better understanding on what really drives gold and silver.

But that’s not nearly enough either. You have to delve deeper and determine where the crisis in confidence is manifesting itself.

Right now, the crisis in confidence is clearly in Europe. Though the United States certainly has many problems — many of them bigger than those affecting Europe — right now, it’s all about Europe, and it’s making the United States look like an island of safety.

Put another way, plunging confidence in Europe is bolstering the United States and, most importantly, the U.S. dollar. Since the euro is NOT the world’s reserve currency, that means that the capital that’s fleeing Europe right now is heading, guess where?

To the U.S. dollar, for safety and liquidity … which is, by default, bearish for the precious metals.

Should You Get Sold
On Selling Silver, Gold?

So you see, plunging gold and silver prices are not so hard to understand when you delve a little deeper and view the world in international terms and with no biases.

No biases about inflation, one currency or another, what markets can or cannot do. Just pure, simple, logical reasoning — unaffected by emotion. That’s all it takes.

Don’t get me wrong. There will come a time when a massive crisis in confidence hits the United States. The time is coming, and that is when you will see the next leg down in the U.S. dollar and the next big bull market in precious metals. But it is not here yet!

Which is precisely why I continue to recommend that all precious metals investors be very careful now. Gold and silver can fall much further than you think possible.

And odds are they will. Because their next bull market legs higher will likely not form until most gold and silver investors have thrown in the towel, and there are very few left to sell. That’s when the precious metals will violently turn back to the upside, leaving most investors in the dust.

If you’ve acted on my suggestions to hedge your gold holdings, or take outright speculative positions in inverse ETFs like those mentioned earlier, hold those positions. There’s a lot more downside potential in gold and silver right now.

Ditto for most commodities. As Europe continues to go down in flames, capital will pour out of Europe and into the U.S. dollar for cash and liquidity purposes … boosting the dollar higher, and forcing the prices of nearly all commodities lower.

My Real Wealth Report members have been way ahead of these moves, and I’ve had them hedge up their gold holdings and take some speculative short positions well ahead of time, and they’re doing great.

My more-speculative service, Resource Windfall Trader, is doing fantastic. Every one of my closed trades over the last 12 consecutive months has seen an average 45% gain in market price. That includes all seven of my losing trades over the last year.

The average hold time for those trades is just 44 days — or about a month and a half. Some examples include big wins such as 233.3% gains on a bearish gold position … 118% and 354% on a bearish silver bet … and much more, including 101.85% gains on a bearish S&P 500 play.

You might want to consider cranking up your profit potential by becoming a member of my Resource Windfall Trader. You can do so now at a full 30% off the regular membership price by clicking here toread my special report.

Best wishes, as always …

Larry

 

Larry Edelson has nearly 33 years of investing experience with a focus in the precious metals and natural resources markets. His Real Wealth Report (a monthly publication) and Resource Windfall Trader (weekly) provide a continuing education on natural resource investments, with recommendations aiming for both profit and risk management.

For more information on Real Wealth Report, click here.
For more information on Resource Windfall Trader, click here.


Shrinking Chinese export quotas and market sentiment have made for unpredictable prices for rare earth elements, but the real opportunity lies with mining  The Critical Metals Report, Anthony Alfidi gives a rundown of his due diligence checklist and shares some junior companies poised for success in this exciting, yet challenging sector.

The Critical Metals Report: In your Alfidi Capital investment research blog, you talked about the wild ride rare earth element (REE) prices had in 2010, as well their the general drop this year. What are you predicting for 2012?

Anthony Alfidi: I believe rare earth elements prices will continue to fall. They had a run-up until this summer, primarily based on Chinese export restrictions and the enthusiasm that some speculators had for the sector. But those conditions are both absent now. I believe that economic fundamentals are weakening around the world and the resulting credit crunch will hurt trade, finance and manufacturing. Demand for rare earth elements is derived from demand for finished goods. Therefore, it’s very much dependent on the overall health of the manufacturing sector. I expect prices for rare earth elements to fall further in 2012.

TCMR: China is both enforcing export quotas and moving to transition from REE producer to REE importer. How will this affect the market, and how much credence to you give to China’s policy goals in this sector?

AA: I believe China will not be able to enforce additional export quotas to support rare earth prices. The coming global market slowdown will tie China’s hands policy-wise. The country needs to keep exports up because it still has a primarily export-driven growth policy. Many analysts were predicting stronger economic growth up until late this summer, when China announced its most recent export quota targets. 

TCMR: So you expect the sector to be based on free-market, supply-and-demand principles? 

AA: Yes, absolutely. And, my outlook reflects weakness in the global economy, which is beyond Chinese influence. 

TCMR: Some rare earths are much rarer and have significant market demand. Do you expect better performance in 2012 for these metals, and which REEs are at the top of your list?

AA: If I had to pick one, it would be dysprosium, one of the heavy rare earth elements. Demand for dysprosium will remain fairly healthy as long as the market for wind turbines remains healthy and is supported by government subsidies and stimulus spending. 

TCMR: How is dysprosium used in wind turbines?

AA: It’s used in the generator magnets and, when combined with neodymium, it helps neodymium retain its magnetism at high temperatures. 

TCMR: You spoke at the Hard Assets Rare Earth Investment Summit in San Francisco on November 29th along with John Thomas, Jeb Handwerger and Mickey Fulp. Was there a consensus opinion for industry prospects? 

AA: I’m not sure if there was a consensus from the panel. The other panelists seemed to think that rare earth elements had a healthy future of growth due to constrained supply and a lack of substitution, technology-wise. I’m not nearly as bullish as John and Jeb were. I think it has a future out to about 2016. By then, demand weakness due to the renewed recession in the developed world is going to run headlong into new supply coming online. Also, technology innovations by manufacturers could reduce demand for rare earths. 

So, putting it all together, all those factors will put a long-term price ceiling on the rare earth elements. Only the lowest-cost producers are going to survive. In the long-term, REE substitutes will eventually become available, thanks to some long-overdue research and current development underway. 

TCMR: The big play is the mining stocks, which have offered more opportunity than the price of the metals themselves. Some analysts anticipate major gains as projects come online. Furthermore, demand for electric vehicles is expected to be the governing factor in REE markets. What’s your take?

AA: I think electric vehicles will play an enormous role. Lanthanum is important because it’s useful in batteries, but not nearly as powerful as lithium-ion batteries. Lithium-ion batteries are going to be used in the 2012 Honda Civic hybrid, the Nissan Leaf and the Chevy Volt. That’s an important distinction because the range of a hybrid or electric vehicle is a significant issue for buyers, due to the lack of charging stations that will limit that range. So, lithium-ion battery technology has a competitive advantage over nickel-metal hydrides with lanthanum. 

TCMR: In your November 28th post, you wrote that miners that were previously digging for uranium, cobalt, gold and other prosaic metals were rebranding themselves as rare earth explorers in order to gain cache from nervous investors. Then you warned that finding trace amounts of rare earth elements in a large ore body doesn’t make an exploration company viable as a rare earth producer. How can investors separate the rare earth posers from the actual junior miners that have a reasonable chance of making money in this market?

AA: As I said at the Hard Assets Panel, I’d like to see operating geologists as CEOs and senior managers because geologists know how to pull rocks out of the earth’s crust and turn them into metals. Venture capitalists in Silicon Valley call that betting on the jockey, not the horse. I would apply the same methodology to the mining sector. I would also add that in addition to the quality of management, I would look for the logistics trifecta. Besides an economic ore body, water, power and roads are what make a project economically viable. A water source is needed for a mine to use heap leaching, which is the predominate method for ore recovery today. A power source is needed to run the operations and good road access connects the mine to national infrastructure. 

Most junior mining companies experience net losses until they go into full production. They’re spending money in startup mode and management has to know the burn rate. If management tells you the burn rate is x and I do my own calculations based on publicly available financial statements that tell me something different, that tells me that management doesn’t understand their own cost of exploration and production and they’re going to have problems down the road. 

Evaluating projects on these criteria helps me quickly eliminate companies that have poor prospects. 

It’s also important to remember that some concepts that apply to judging larger resource companies don’t work very well in evaluating rare earth element producers. That’s because there are a much smaller number of mines operating worldwide and those that are, primarily in China for example, are not necessarily financially transparent. 

TCMR: What are some individual investment opportunities you’d like to comment on?

AA: Sure. I’ve looked at Quest Rare Minerals Ltd. (QRM:TSX.V; QRM:NYSE.A) and actually had a blog post about them a couple of weeks ago. The deposit at Strange Lake looks like it has some really high-quality ore. The problem I have with Quest is that this property has never been viable because it has always lacked a road network connecting it to the outside world. But Quest has a plan to build a 75-mile road through the Québec wilderness to Voisey Bay at a cost of $135M. If the Québec Government is willing to subsidize the cost of that road then that will certainly make Quest’s prospects that much more viable and the company won’t have to raise as much money.

TCMR: What else looks interesting?

AA: I’m fairly optimistic about Rare Element Resources Ltd. (RES:TSX; REE:NYSE.A). All of its executives and directors have mining backgrounds, not just the CEO, who is a geologist. That’s really good. The results of its drilling program this year are very encouraging and it does have an NI 43-101 report. Its Bear Lodge Property has the logistics trifecta, big bonus points in my book. And, I also think that its adaptation of gravel washing techniques to the type of ore it found on site is truly outside-the-box thinking. That demonstrates why it’s beneficial to have a CEO who is a geologist running the company. However, I do have some caveats about RES. I think its most expensive deposits, according to what it publishes on its website, are cerium and lanthanum. Cerium suffered a big price collapse this year, going from $170 per kilogram (kg) to about $45/kg. As I already noted, automakers are looking at lithium-ion as an alternative to lanthanum in hybrid batteries. So, maybe demand for lanthanum won’t be as strong as the company is hoping. 

TCMR: What’s your appraisal of where the company is in the development process?

AA: It looks like the company has one more drill program to go next year. If the results next year are just as encouraging, that should be the last exploratory program it needs before it can estimate what it needs for full production. I think it will be ready to produce in a couple of years. It’s much more mature than any of the other comparable companies I saw at the Hard Assets Summit.

TCMR: Any others you like?

AA: Dacha Strategic Metals Inc. (DSM:TSX.V; DCHAF:OTCQX) is an interesting company. It has a unique business model. The way it stockpiles metals means it functions more like an ETF than an operating company. The company has done a very smart thing in locating its three warehouses in Korea, Singapore and Shanghai, close to manufacturers who will need the inputs. It’s good that its inventory is primarily heavy rare earths (HREEs), which are the more valuable ones. I would say the value of its metals inventory would have to be higher than its market capitalization for Dacha to be a buying opportunity. So, tracking this stock, the question for investors then becomes whether they’re willing to track the weekly report of metal inventories on Dacha’s website. The company is unique. It stands out as a business model. 

TCMR: Any other ones that you think people ought to consider for some sort of positive market reaction next year?

AA: I’m doing my homework on Pele Mountain Resources Inc. (GEM:TSX.V) and a couple of others that I saw at the Hard Assets Conference. So, I may have something to blog about in the next couple of weeks.

TCMR: What was the mood like at the Conference?

AA: It was as lively as ever, and the Rare Earth Summit was definitely fascinating. Attendees were primarily individual and accredited investors. I would’ve liked to see more sell side analysts from investment banks. I think the rare earth metal sector is tracked mainly by Canadian investment banks. This sector needs publicity both from a bull standpoint, meaning people who want to get into the sector and a bear standpoint, meaning people like me who are cautious. We need more debate, analysis and transparency of this sector. The Rare Earth Summit was a step in the right direction. 

TCMR: Do you have any parting thoughts or tips for investors that are thinking of getting into the critical metals space?

AA: I think investors should read articles published by leading analysts such as Jack LiftonMickey Fulpand Gareth Hatch. They were all present at the Conference and the Rare Earth Summit. These are independent analysts who’ve been evaluating mining companies their entire careers. Investors should also develop a simple checklist similar to mine, which they can use to run through many companies to find the ones that have the best prospects for success. They should also realize that rare earth prices are extremely volatile, partly due to political decisions outside of the marketplace, like China’s export policies. Finally, I also think investors should be skeptical of so-called bonanza mother lode stories from places that have had very little exploration or development. 

Afghanistan jumps right out at me. The U.S. Government has publicized some studies claiming that there are trillions of dollars worth of metals in Afghanistan. That may be true, but going back to the logistics trifecta, where are the roads in Afghanistan to take all this stuff out? When you look at emerging markets or markets that have never emerged, like Afghanistan or other places in Africa that have had questionable political histories, you have to really question any company that claims that it can operate successfully in those areas. I would take that with a big grain of salt.

TCMR: Thanks for your interesting, useful input. We’ll look forward to talking to you again in 2012.

AA: Great.

Anthony Alfidi is the founder and CEO of Alfidi Capital, an investment research firm in San Francisco, California. Alfidi Capital publishes free investment research with honesty and humor. Mr. Alfidi holds a Bachelor’s degree in human resource management from the University of Notre Dame and an MBA in finance from the University of San Francisco. He is a life member of Beta Gamma Sigma, an academic honors society for business majors. He has been a private investor since the 1990s. 

Want to read more exclusive Critical Metals Report articles like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators and learn more about critical metals companies, visit our Critical Metals Report page.

Commodities Run in Supercycles

Commodity prices can be very volatile, oftentimes more so than just about any other asset class. These large price swings, which have been particularly evident in recent years, have given commodities their reputation for high risk. Those investors who lack a large buffer of disposable risk capital are repeatedly advised to steer clear. But for those investors who can bear the risk, and who look to invest in commodities as an inflation hedge, there is some evidence to suggest that commodity prices move in long term “supercycles,” which play out over years and even decades. By observing and understanding these movements, these investors may be able to be more strategic in their approach.

Commodity booms and busts oftentimes last far beyond the time frame normally associated with a typical business cycle. IMF analysis of historical price movements in commodities filters out less significant short term movements to search for “trough to peak” and “peak to trough” cycles. They found that between 1862 and 1999, long booms were followed by large slumps, resulting in cycles of several decades.

For example, after hitting lows in 1868, prices then followed an uptrend until 1907, when they reversed course and drifted downward until 1915. That complete cycle lasted a full 47 years. There is a 16 year cycle from 1915 to 1931, and a still longer, nearly symmetrical 40 year cycle, which saw rising prices for 20 years between 1931 and 1951 and falling prices between 1951 and 1971. 

commodity1

For much of the late 1990s and early 2000s, booming commodity prices lent powerful support to the idea that the world was locked into an uptrend of a supercycle. A World Bank index of commodity prices climbed 109% between early 2003 and 2008. From trough to peak, oil prices rose 1,145% in nominal terms between December 1998 and July 2008. But when commodity prices suffered a significant collapse in the latter half of 2008, many had assumed that the down leg of the cycle had settled in. The stunning collapse in oil prices, with Brent sinking from $146 per barrel in mid-2008 to $36 per barrel five months later, was a decline of historic proportions. Having jumped aboard the train too late, many investors booked staggering losses and wrote commodities out of their asset allocations strategy for the post crash era.

But the rapid price rebound from the lows of 2008 and 2009 has challenged these conclusions. Between December 2008 and June 2009, the price of Brent crude oil more than doubled, ultimately returning to $126 in April 2011, within spitting distance of its 2008 peak. The recovery was not only in oil: the Rogers International Commodity Index total return product also doubled between February 2009 and April 2011. Given these rebounds, it is possible that the panic drops of 2008 were not in fact a fulcrum of a supercycle. Indeed, the robustness of the price recovery has led some to wonder whether any corners were actually turned and whether we are still locked in a commodities uptrend that began more than a decade ago. 

commodity2

Indeed, key drivers like global inflation are still in place to propel commodity prices upward for what appears to be years to come. There now can be little doubt that overly indebted nations in Europe and the U.S. will look to inflate currencies rather than cut spending or raise taxes to solve their fiscal woes. To maintain a global status quo, Asian economies will also inflate to limit the rise in their currencies. At the same time, demand emanating from the developing world has exceeded available supply on a near-continual basis since the early 2000s, except during the depths of the Great Recession. In addition, the marginal cost of production also appears to have increased across a variety of commodities.

Even without these drivers, there is ample historical precedent to allow for the continuance of a multi-decade commodity boom. Even if commodity prices continue rising over the next 20 years, as Jim Rogers has argued, the total boom period would still be 10 years less the boom between 1868 and 1907, and just a few years more than the one that occurred after the Great Depression and World War II.

Certainly a global economic boom between 2003 and 2008 was part of the story that pushed up commodity prices so severely during the early part of the last decade. Real world GDP grew by more than 4% each year from 2004 through 2007, which the IMF points out was the first time that level of growth on a global level had been achieved since the early 1970s. Many people who are negative on commodities mistakenly focus solely on demand as a key driver. They argue that a continuance of a commodity boom can’t occur absent growth in the developed world.  

But a look at the aluminum market over the course of the twentieth century makes clear that demand is not the only, or even primary, factor in spurring a decades-long increase in prices. Based on surging demand, global aluminum output rose 40-fold for a full three decade span, from 1939 to 1969 – yet real prices trended downward over that time. The example of crude oil is even more dramatic. Between the years 1965 and 1970, global oil consumption exploded from 30.8 million barrels per day to 45.4 million barrels per day. But according to BP data for Saudi Arabian crude, prices over those same five years declined from $12.43 to $10.10. Despite the outward shift in the demand curve, the supply response was more than sufficient, in both cases, to keep prices tethered. Climbing demand is necessary, but not sufficient to provoke an upward commodities supercycle. More thought should be given to supply issues and monetary distortions.

Currently the actions of central banks have supplanted private sector activities as the principal driver of price movements. The price movement of the U.S. dollar is of primary importance. Weighted against the currencies of the U.S.’s main trading partners, the dollar is bumping along the bottom. Any political solution to the chronic sovereign debt crisis in Europe should put much greater pressure on the dollar, and push up commodity prices.

As a result, although we do not expect the economies in the United States or Europe to suddenly strengthen, we don’t believe that the supercycle has turned south. As soon as the situation in Europe finally shows a moderate degree of stability, long term growth-oriented investors, who can tolerate the heightened volatility, may consider adding weight to their exposure to a broad basket of commodities, either through direct exposure to commodities or through a carefully selected portfolio of commodity-related equities. 

 

About Euro Pacific Capital Inc. & Peter Schiff

Peter Schiff, the firm’s founder and CEO is recognized for spotting trends long before mainstream analysts. He leads our experienced and diverse team of managers, researchers, consultants and support staff in delivering the highest possible value for our clients – a team literally scanning the globe for investment opportunities.

With the stock market acting poorly, commentators are constantly searching for good news or encouraging statistics in a bid to stir up bullishness. They are wasting their time. The markets do not move on current news.

The real story is in the action of the stock market itself. I refer to the Lowry’s statistics. They show that the urge to buy stocks (demand) is weak and sluggish. Conversely, the urge to sell stocks (supply) is strong and surpasses the desire (demand) to buy. These are not guesses. The Lowry’s figures are derived from the actual daily transactions, based on daily volume and total points gained or lost each day, on the NYSE.

Gold: “You can cut the bearishness with a knife”

The time to take counsel of your fears is before you make an important battle decision. That’s the time to listen to every fear you can imagine! When you have collected all the facts and fears and made your decision, turn off all your fears and go ahead!

George S. Patton

Picture-62

“As the chart above shows, there is significant support for gold between $1,500 and $1,600 per ounce as investors step in to take advantage of lower gold prices.  More importantly, gold’s multi-year upward channel is still intact.” – Chart & Comment by Eric McWhinnie

Back in the spring of 2003 with gold nudging above $300 an ounce, yours truly turned bullish on gold after a 3+ year hiatus. While I thankfully sidestepped the few serious corrections in what I’ve called the “Mother” of all gold bull markets, I remained an ardent bull throughout (funny how the gold haters call anybody who’s been bullish and correct for a long-time a gold bug as if that’s to suggest we’re just crazy and can’t think straight).

My last cautious note was this past September when for one of those very brief moments we witnessed the gold bull boat get overloaded and was starting to sink. Because I believe gold is hated by the vast majority of people in the financial arena and the media that follows it, I don’t get swayed by their anti-gold tactic when the inevitable corrections hit – as it is now.

Dennis Gartman may have been the lightning rod this time around but the crowd and its methods are basically the same. What’s special this time is the bearish mood is verywidespread and has not only totally removed the euphoria that existed in September, but you can now cut the bearishness with a knife. Sentiment suggests much of the selling has already been done.

The current negative technical picture is what is helping drive the bearish calls and that won’t change overnight. At a bare minimum, it shall take weeks to repair the damage and its possible a further move lower of $100+ before a real intermediate to long-term bottom is in. But the key bullish fundamentals that I’ve constantly stated (and many of them are also noted in this article) remain firmly in place.

However, as George Patton suggested, I’ve collected all the facts and fears and made a decision – the “mother” of all gold bull markets won’t end until it’s at $2,000+