Daily Updates
Today, your California editor will pay homage to the classic picture books of our generation – Where the Wild Things Are, Green Eggs and Ham and Goodnight Moon – with a special “Financial World in Pictures” edition of The Daily Reckoning.
As it turns out, not all of the world’s wild things are in Max’s bedroom. Some of the wildest things of all are in the accounting ledgers of various national governments. Greek finances, for example, aren’t just wild; they’re scary too.

The Greeks are short of cash, plain and simple. But a variety of European leaders and finance officials refuse to see it that way. They want to imagine, like Max, that they can become “king of all wild things” and tame the savage debt crisis that’s prowling around in the euro zone… But we doubt the finance ministers will fare as well as Max. The Greek debt monster will not return to the closet without mauling a few bondholders along the way.
Financial markets around the globe rallied yesterday on the “good news” that the European Union and the IMF would continue bailing out Greece. Never mind that last year’s $157 billion bailout failed to make the insolvent Greeks solvent, the EU pooh-bahs are cobbling together a new $60 billion bailout which, as Joel Bowman pointed out yesterday, “does little more than to give false hope to a doomed scenario.”
“If the medicine isn’t working, increase the dose. That, at least, is the treatment plan being pursued by the saviors of the euro in Brussels,” Germany’s Der Spiegel cynically observes. “Hardly anyone believes anymore that Greece can avoid a restructuring, or a debt haircut. Its mountain of debts has grown to more than 150 percent of gross domestic product this year. Meanwhile, the economy is shrinking, partly because of the austerity measures.
“The country is stuck in a vicious circle,” Der Spiegel continues. “Investors refuse to lend Greece money at affordable interest rates because they are convinced that Greece is over-indebted. This forces the government to accept bailout loans from its partner countries, which further increases debt levels while reducing creditworthiness.”
Greek finances have entered the hopeless stage – a fact that is obvious to the Man on the Street, but opaque to the men and women in the conference rooms of Northern Europe. “A total restructuring of Greek debt is not an option and nobody is planning it,” Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker reiterated yesterday. A few days earlier, the French Finance Minister, Christine Lagarde, declared, “A restructuring of Greek debts is absolutely out of the question.” Likewise, German Finance Minister, Wolfgang Schäuble, is on the record saying, “A debt restructuring is not under consideration and is completely speculative.”
These vehement official declarations can mean only one thing: A debt restructuring is absolutely certain and everybody should be planning on it.
“The question is no longer whether Greece will restructure its debt, but when.” says Peer Steinbrück, the predecessor of Germany’s current Finance Minister. Oxford economist, Clemens Fuest, agrees, “Europe’s governments must face reality. [They] cannot keep behaving as if Greece were not insolvent, while constantly imposing new burdens on taxpayers for the bailout.”
Despite these self-evident observations, the EU will continue fighting against the inevitable for a while longer. “We will try to solve the Greek problem by the end of June,” says Juncker. Conveniently, Juncker specified only the month, but not the year.
A solution will certainly arrive, but it will certainly not look anything like the solution EU finance ministers are implementing…and it will certainly not be painless.
“Large segments of the [Greek] population favor a quick fix, like the one Vassilis Sarantopoulos, 50, the head of a small Greek publishing company, recommends,” Der Spiegel relates. “The ‘solution’ to Greece’s debt crisis is obvious, says Sarantopoulos: ‘Withdrawal from the euro zone, return to the drachma, non-recognition of the government debt.’… Sarantopoulos is one of the advocates of a new movement in Greece called ‘I Won’t Pay.’ The name speaks for itself.”
Yes it does. But this “new movement” is as old as the Caveman’s first IOU. “I won’t pay” isn’t painless, but it is an elegantly simple solution…and it always works. It always solves insolvency.
Alas, Greece’s feeble finances are not the only wild things roaming around in the financial markets “roaring their terrible roars, gnashing their terrible teeth” and “showing their terrible claws.”
The US housing market is also looking pretty scary. The Case-Shiller 20-City Index of home prices has dropped to its lowest level since mid-2003. After adjusting for inflation, the index has tumbled to 1999 levels. “Prices have now fallen further since the bubble burst than they did during the Great Depression,” the Associate Press reports. “It took 19 years for the housing market to regain its losses after the Depression ended.”

Apparently, no one wants to buy a house. In a recent survey, 92% of all homeowners said they believe it is a bad time to sell a house. Visibly, an even higher percentage of folks – like about 100% – believe it is a bad time to buy house. The pace of new home sales has plunged to the lowest level since JFK was sharing afternoon teas with Marilyn Monroe. Folks are simply too fearful or too credit-strapped to buy a home.
They do not want to buy a house.
They will not buy one with a mouse.
They will not buy one with a spouse.
They do not like home prices that fall. They do not like these things at all.
Home prices seem destined to continue falling for a while. Pending home sales plunged 12% in April, according to the National Association of Realtors. Meanwhile, foreclosed inventory continues flooding into the market. CoreLogic estimates that 1.8 million mortgages are more than 90 days delinquent, in foreclosure or bank-owned. This “shadow inventory” will swell the number of unsold homes by nearly 50%!
The housing mega-bust is no mystery, of course. Folks without jobs or savings tend to buy very few homes. Americans, by and large, are in the retrenchment stage. They are trying to solidify their shaky finances by shopping less and saving more…or saving anything. They are struggling to re-pay debt the old-fashion way – by defaulting and/or curtailing consumption relative to incomes.

The Greek government will get there eventually…and when it does, the repercussions will certainly extend beyond its borders. French and German banks, to name two obvious victims, will suffer blows to their balance sheets. But who knows how far and wide the repercussions might spread?
Perhaps the resulting trauma will cross the Atlantic and wound a few financial institutions on our own shores. Already, Goldman Sachs is exhibiting some uncharacteristic frailty. For the first time in recent history (and probably ever) the cost of insuring Goldman’s debt against default is more expensive than the cost of insuring Citigroup’s debt against default.

In other words, professional investors are saying that Goldman is riskier than Citi. Why? Perhaps it’s because the Justice Department is sniffing around in Goldman’s books and records; perhaps it’s because an ex-Goldman guy is no longer Treasury Secretary; perhaps it’s because Goldman’s profitability remains hyper-vulnerable to financial market distress, like that kind of distress that could result from the simultaneous defaults of two million American homeowners and two or three European governments.
At that point, it would be time to say, “Good night.”
Good night Greek banks.
Good night banks that hold Greek bonds.
Good night US housing market.
Good night banks that hold mortgage-backed securities.
Good night quantitative easing.
Good night Ben Bernanke.
Good night global bond markets.
Good night financial firms that receive federal indictments for lying to clients.
Good night Goldman Sachs.
Regards,
Eric J. Fry
for The Daily Reckoning
Eric J. Fry, Agora Financial’s Editorial Director, has been a specialist in international equities for nearly two decades. He was a professional portfolio manager for more than 10 years, specializing in international investment strategies and short-selling. Following his successes in professional money management, Mr. Fry joined the Wall Street-based publishing operations of James Grant, editor of the prestigious Grant’s Interest Rate Observer. Working alongside Grant, Mr. Fry produced Grant’s International and Apogee Research — institutional research products dedicated to international investment opportunities and short selling.
Video Report: Legally Collect Thousands of Dollars Each Year…From the OTHER government-backed retirement program! Finally – you can get on the inside! Here’s why you must do so now…
Hi-ho silver! The coast is clear; it’s everyone back into the silver pool for more profit fun in the sun
There are numerous reasons why the Canadian dollar will not survive a US dollar collapse:
Summary
Chinese financial and economic authorities are planning a bailout package for the country’s heavily indebted local governments, according to Reuters report. Details resemble a Finance Ministry plan announced in March 2010, but the leak suggests that grave debates are under way among China’s leaders about how to manage growing risks to financial stability before the leadership transition in 2012.
Analysis
China’s central government is preparing a plan to manage massive local government debt problems, according to a May 31 Reuters report. Though the plan and its details remain unconfirmed — even Chinese language reports are citing Reuters as the sole source — the report suggests that a major attempt is under way to address the greatest immediate challenge to China’s financial stability. In March 2010, China’s Ministry of Finance announced a plan to overhaul local government finances. Little progress has been reported since, but the details from Reuters correspond closely to the overhaul plan and suggest it is nearing implementation.
The report cites unnamed sources with direct knowledge of the plan, claiming that Beijing will adopt a range of measures to clean up local governments’ financial books, which have become overburdened with debt since the massive nationwide credit binge launched to combat the global financial crisis in 2008. Local governments set up local government financial vehicles (LGFVs) to borrow from banks and manage development projects because the governments themselves, with very few exceptions, are not allowed to issue bonds and finance projects in such a manner.
In mid-2010, the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) revealed that of about 8 trillion yuan (about $1.23 trillion) in loans to LGFVs, an anticipated 25 percent would go bad, while another 50 percent was tied to projects that were unprofitable but were supported by local governments’ regular revenues. In May 2011, a Chinese news report cited the Ministry of Finance as saying that by 2009, local debt had reached 2.79 trillion yuan and that outstanding local loans had reached 7.38 trillion yuan, or about 226.4 percent of total local government revenue. After the local debt problem ballooned in 2009-2010, Beijing revealed that it would conduct investigations into local government finances to determine the scope of the problem.
According to the May 31 Reuters report, Beijing’s investigation concluded that local governments had accumulated a tally of 10 trillion yuan worth of debt, and that about 2 trillion (or 20 percent) of it was expected to go bad, roughly in line with the earlier CBRC estimate. Consequently, the CBRC, along with the Ministry of Finance, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), and presumably the central bank and other bodies, are planning a combination of measures to address the problem. These include:
- Two to three trillion yuan worth of debt would be transferred from local governments to major state-owned banks.
- The central government would shoulder some of the burden by paying off loans and taking debt onto its books.
- State-owned banks, including some of the top four state-owned commercial banks, would have to write off an unspecified amount of the bad debt and accept losses.
- Provincial and municipal governments would be granted legal permission to issue bonds to cover debts and finance projects going forward.
- The government would oversee an entire overhaul and consolidation of the LGFVs.
- The report also referred vaguely to “new” companies that would be set up to accept some of the debt transfers, perhaps asset management companies. It also spoke of new allowances for private investors to invest in areas in which they were previously not allowed invest, though it was unclear whether this would be to purchase debt or to finance future economic projects.
- The plan is expected to be implemented in June and completed by September, though one source said it could take longer.
Therefore, it would appear that the Chinese government is preparing a bold new bailout for local governments, along the lines of the large bailout of debt-ridden state-owned banks in the late 1990s and early 2000s that ultimately was estimated to have cost more than $600 billion. The beneficiaries of the rumored new bailout would be the local governments rather than state banks, which would be burdened by the new debt loads in a way that would likely adversely affect lending. Such a bailout would put more burdens on the public balance sheet at the expense of the taxpayer, counteracting policy goals of boosting household wealth and consumption. The fact that through this plan local governments would obtain permission to issue bonds to finance their operations would be a major policy move if it proved to have nationwide applicability, though Beijing has allowed certain local governments to test bond issues in the past three years.
Ultimately, the leaked details of the plan are imprecise. There is little outside verification, and such a plan inevitably will entail fierce debate, revisions and modifications. But the details correspond very closely to the plan the Ministry of Finance announced more than a year ago. Notably, the leak suggests the Chinese leadership may still be seeking to tackle the local debt problem now, ahead of the 18th Communist Party of China congress in the fall of 2012, when the next generation of Chinese leaders will be appointed. A bailout for the massive local government debt problem was inevitable; the question was always the timing. While the current leaders may be the best suited to oversee such a large bailout due to their authority and experience, there is reason to think they would prefer to avoid major risky reforms, lest the situation prove unmanageable and damaging to their legacy.
All that can be determined at present is that a bailout plan for local governments is still being discussed. Are China’s leaders debating this now because they believe that with global recovery continuing and over $3 trillion in foreign exchange reserves, they have the advantage? Or are they being forced to tackle the problem now because of exigencies related to the slowing pace of economic growth and extensive systemic financial risks? If a bailout is implemented in this time frame, the extent to which Beijing will use its cash surpluses for recapitalizations is unclear. Moreover, it remains to be seen whether it will attack financial problems directly or merely use expedients to preserve financial stability in the short term, even at the cost of building up greater risk in the long term.
This analysis was just a fraction of what our subscribers enjoy, preview a week of full access for only 5 Dollars!