April ushered in both broader evidence of recovery in parts of the Western
economy, and a series of both ecological and economic “events” that are
quite worrisome. It’s unlikely any of the April events (including, we fervently
hope, sovereign debt) would be, in and of itself, shattering. What each does
is to impact the psychology under which markets are operating and hence
how they perform. The cumulative impact of these events after a strong
uptick means sell buttons are being pushed, and should be signaling profits
taking by you. How much is the question.
The notion of an event impacting markets hard isn’t news. In the last decade
both the 9-11 destruction of New York’s twin towers and the flooding of New
Orleans by Hurricane Katrina made the list. The Black Swan by Nassim Taleb
that became popular after the Credit Crunch meltdown emphasized the
concept. We would emphasis, however, that a 9-11, Katrina and the Credit
Crunch are different birds.
The 9-11 attacks were a calculated attempt to disrupt western commerce.
They worked because, like any high impact terrorist act, they were a
surprise. The timing deepened a recession that was ready to get underway
and broadened the bear market the Tech bubble ushered in. They have cost
$trillions in added security cost and 10s of thousands of lives to war in a
broad protracted aftermath. 9-11 earned the Black Swan Event moniker.
Katrina was an event to be expected though also impossible to time. Most of
the region picked up and carried on as it had after similar weather borne
destruction. Human suffering was largely immediate. The impact to New
Orleans was exceptional. It hasn’t really recovered from its failed levee
system after five years. One immediate impact was to underscore resource
scarcity for oil, plus zinc and other metals for which the city acts a
warehousing/transport hub. That helped set up crazy oil prices, but the event
had little broader impact The Credit Crunch was/is an event that fit
perfectly into the financial model Taleb uses in his (now) popular short fund.
That would seem to make the Crunch an obvious Black Swan Event. It was,
however, another difficult-to-time event like Katrina rather than a true
surprise like 9-11. Many could see the bubbles forming and warned about
them. The timing of the Crunch will be a marker for the economic turning
point from western to eastern centers. Right now it feels like that marker is
Since it got underway over two and a half years ago, the credit crunch seems
less like a black swan and more like a slow motion train wreck. That is especially true of late. The crisis gripping parts of Europe has been brewing
for months. Like drivers who realize too late they won’t make a corner,
markets are reacting to seemingly implacable forces they can’t seem to
There are several worries that relate specifically to the metals sector.
China’s moves to slow the pace of growth appear to be working. That’s good
in the long run if it allows China to avoid its own bubble. The obvious
downside is this could mean a near term slackening of demand that is
showing up in metal prices.
The second is the Australian government’s plan to boost taxes on the “excess
profits” of mining firms. To the obvious impact on companies working in Oz
is added the realization that other jurisdictions could make similar moves.
This is a topic we have touched on in the past and is certainly no black swan
Its no secret to resource sector participants that others think deposits
magically appear without thought or effort on the part of mining companies.
Many governments see resource extraction as some sort of “free lunch”.
When the sector has periods of high profits they must, by definition, be
“excessive” and fair game for revenue hungry governments.
Obviously this raises the bar that determines what is economically viable by
increasing the average cost base for commodities. Part of the reason cheap
oil is over is a revenue sharing structure that sets a high base price for
anything coming out of the well. Following a similar model in the mining
business will simply help ensure metal prices stay high.
The big worries right now of course are European. Most of these have been
visible for a while but had been “normalized” through the last year of market
recovery. Most of the EU did not deal with anything but emergency debt
issues and let longer term problems fester in denial. However, they have
built one on top of an another until its impossible to ignore the pile’s
The sovereign debt of Greece has been labeled junk and is now yielding at
the same level charged by mass mailing credit cards. Portugal’s debt rating
is now slipping away, and Spain is looking increasingly shaky. The €110
billion bail out for Greece with EU/IMF funding is large. Yet Greek workers
are tossing rocks in protest. What they would toss if Germany’s parliament
refuses to ratify its portion we don’t know.
Frustration is understandable, but the reaction of the Greek populace borders
on delusional. The nastier the backlash, the less likely it is that bond buyers
will believe Greece is willing to take the necessary steps. Without some faith
in the bond pits, interest rates in Greece will stay at levels that all but guarantee a debt spiral even with a bailout in place.
Many Club Med citizens are remembering the “good old days” when they
could devalue their way out of spending crises and print the money to pay
back old debts. If reason doesn’t prevail, the core countries in the EU may
have to cover some bank debts directly and give rioters their wish by cutting
them out of the EMU. Definitely one of those “be careful what you wish for”
scenarios that we really hope does not come to pass.
An Icelandic volcano shut down most European air traffic for five days and is
increasing its activity again as this is written. This volcano can spew for
months at time, and has often signaled its bigger neighbor is about to
awaken. The disruptions to air traffic going forward aren’t likely to be as
severe, but it will make travel planning tougher and more expensive to deal
with. Just another headache for Euroland.
A South Korean warship mysteriously sinks, and evidence increasingly points
to a North Korean torpedo as the cause. Since North Korea is mum on the
subject, the best case would seem to be that a lower ranking nutcase was
responsible rather than the “Dear Leader”.
A presumably lone nutcase who fortunately had limited skills plants a bomb
in Times Square. It didn’t explode and is not likely to damage the city’s
image. One wonders if it was actually heading for Wall St and just happened
to begin sputtering in mid Main St. We take a little comfort from that thought
since we’ll be speaking at a conference across the street next week.
A BP oil well in the Gulf of Mexico blows out and is seriously leaking. So far,
damage to the Gulf seems to be relatively limited, but few immediate
solutions are at hand. The impact on further such oil production will at a
minimum be higher capital costs to ensure problems of this sort can be dealt
with more quickly. Washington only recently opened up a number of offshore
areas to new drilling. An ill wind blowing the wrong way could ensure these
areas get closed again.
A writ has been filed against Goldman Sachs and a young VP. It alleges that
a synthetic CDO was filled by the worst possible mortgage crap with the aid
of a client who intended to short it. Regardless of whether this is judged
illegal or not, the ethics at work is going to cause further questioning of how
financial markets function. Goldman is the big dog on Wall St. Most of its
clients didn’t seem too concerned about its proprietary trading as long as the
gains were there. This case could give a lot of those clients second thoughts.
Reformers will now have a freer hand to do their work and those voting
against financial reform bills will have to explain why, even if the bills are
silly. Whether new legislation will actually help is another question.
Most events like those above can be dealt with individually without terribly
serious market disruptions. The potential of sovereign default will always shake things up since banking gets hurt which can lead to severe domino
effects. Greece’s debt is large enough to matter internationally, but only
just. It’s concern for southern Europe as a whole that is the real issue in this
case. The ability of a country to escape a debt spiral is directly correlated to
the interest rate the market demands for its debt. Even if the PIIGS enforce
credible spending cuts they can still be trapped in a spiral if lending costs
don’t settle down. There is no way we know of to legislate this since its
basically about trust.
Financial cotangents are mostly about lost confidence. Despite large gains
for some assets since the Crunch, confidence hadn’t really returned at large
enough scale to deal with a pile this size right now. Most of the European
banking sector has made much less serious efforts to write off and
recapitalize than banks in the US. That may now be forced on them. If
recent bond yields and share prices for southern European banks are any
guide, the equity injections will be public again rather than private.
Markets reflect the common consciousness. That isn’t a philosophical
musing, but merely a fact. If this pile gets any larger markets will continue
to retreat. We try to regularly remind that profits taking should be an on
going part of dealing with what are generally high risk stories. Hopefully you
have taken note.
The $6 Billion?
Now that base metal prices are in decline, the next question is more obvious.
How much is enough? The continuing puzzle of what size of copper inventory
markets can handle comes down to that. LME stockpiles have dropped by
well over 15% since late February, as have the much smaller Comex stocks.
In Shanghai the copper stockpiles have grown by almost 30 Kt in the past
month, which offsets about half the LME declines. All of the SHFE metal
stocks are growing right now, and stockpiles of other mineral goods are flat
lining. Shanghai’s stocks continue to auger the global price picture.
The decline in western stocks may indicate a reluctance to sell metal when it
appears western economies are mending. Added availability in China could
relate to fresh indications the Yuan is finally going to be allowed to rise as
much as it is efforts to slow growth starting to take root. For now, holding
Yuan is a Dollar hedge if it is going to rise.
Regardless, copper’s price has become unstuck from its $3.50 per pound
($7700 per tonne) waypoint. Both prices and stockpiles are in decline, as we
had expected would happen at some point. It’s too soon to call this a trend
since the last 50 cents or so of gain looked like froth that needed blowing off.
We do think the “new-normal” can now establish itself.
The listed copper stockpiles are currently valued at about US $5.5 billion,
down from about $6.2 billion a week ago. A decade ago when stockpiles held about 50% more metal than today they were valued well below $2 billion
(about 65 cents per pound) in the midst of a bear market. That is the
seeming disconnect we have been concerned about. But then, these days a
billion here or there is chump change.
The copper stockpiles are valued at about seven or eight days of trading in
Freeport McMoran. It’s not unusual to hedge producer shares by going into
futures market for the metal. Futures pricing on the LME for copper rises,
slightly, out to the 15 month slot. That on its own could be holding the spot
It’s also true that smelters are having a tough time contracting as much
concentrate as they’d like. As we’ve noted before the overbuilding of
smelters in China has caused an upstream capacity glut, and smelters have
cut charges to the bone to ensure they can maintain supply. Asian smelters
often supply other units in the same conglomerate. That makes the issue of
supply maintenance a critical concern that could also bring more long buyers
to the futures market.
None of this means the copper price is going to move back up. If sentiment
shifts towards a short circuiting of the western recovery, or the Asian boom,
copper would continue to pull back with everything else.
Copper producers are trading at levels established before copper’s last up
leg. Either the possibility of a broader down turn had still been weighing on
them, or market ratios are changing. Though we think the former is most
likely, this is the wrong time to be concerned on which is the more
important. For the time being we continue to be more focused on warehouse
changes than on price for all the base metals. That and Mediterranean bond
The chart on this page shows the gold price over the last decade measured against a basket of five currencies (the Canadian and US Dollars, UK Pounds, Euros and Yen. It’s a good indication of how strong the recent move has been when you stop thinking in dollars.
Gold has not seen new all time highs in $CAD or $US and yet the chart above
shows a clear upward breakout. The chart for Euros or pounds is much more
impressive and gold has been moving up against all currencies.
All of this is another way of saying gold is trading like a currency which
means its trading on its own against all currencies. There have been a
number of recent sessions where gold had strong upward moves in the face
of falling stock markets and a surging dollar. This is quite different from the
pattern two years ago when gold was falling 30% as markets panicked and
the Dollar surged. Currency trades never happen isolation; you are always
selling one currency to buy another. In the past month we think much of the
new money entering the gold market is coming out of the Euro which has
been crashing hard.
This is different from straight “fear buying” and has the potential to be more
long lasting and fundamental in its aspect. Those that have expected gold to
falter whenever the markets showed some strength lately have been
Gold’s trading pattern has changed several times in the past few years and it
can certainly change again. Nonetheless, the market now seems set up for a
challenge of last year’s all time high which bodes well for gold stocks.
To view Eric Coffin’s latest video interview on Industry Watch with Al Korelin, please go HERE [April 12, 2010]
Gain access to potential gains of hundreds or even thousands of percent! HRA initiated
coverage on 8 new companies in 2009. So far, the average gain on those companies is
over 250%! For more information about HRA Advisories, please visit: