A Critical Juncture: 3 Reasons why it could break any day

Posted by Rosenberg Farrell Prechter Russell Yamada

Share on Facebook

Tweet on Twitter

As for the equity market, we are at a critical juncture and it could break any day. After successfully testing support at the key Fibonacci retracement level of 1,040, the S&P 500 has since bounced up to the 200-day moving average of 1,115 – and this failed to hold.  Resistance prevailed.  My sense is that the market will break to the downside, and for three reasons:

1. Even if a double dip is avoided, the market is not priced for a growth relapse.

2. The intense volatility in the major averages over the past three months is consistent with the onset of a bear phase.

3. Bob Farrell believes a test of the March 2009 lows is likely.  I don’t think anyone is in a position to debate five decades of experience, not to mention his track record. Louise Yamada, a legend in her own right, not to mention the likes of Bob Prechter and Richard Russell, are on this same page.  Notice how none of them work at a Wall Street bank.



Well, well, so much for consensus views.  Like the one we woke up to on Monday morning recommending that bonds be sold and equities be bought on the news of China’s “peg” decision.  As we said on Monday, did the 20%-plus yuan appreciation from 2005 to 2008 really alter the investment landscape all that much?  It looks like Mr. Market is coming around to the view that all China managed to really accomplish was to shift the focus away from its rigid FX policy to Germany’s rigid approach towards fiscal stimulus.

What is becoming clearer, especially after the latest reports on housing starts, permits, resales and builder sentiment surveys, is that housing is already double dipping in the U.S.  The MBA statistics just came out for the week of June 18 and the new purchase index fell 1.2% – down 36.5% from year-ago levels and that year-ago level itself was down 22% from its year-ago level. Capish, paisan?  So far, June is averaging 14.5% below May’s level and May was crushed 18% sequentially, so do not expect what is likely to be an ugly new home sales report for May today to be just a one-month wonder.  Meanwhile, the widespread view out of the economics community is that we will see at least 3% growth in the second half of the year: fat chance of that.

What is fascinating is how the ECRI, which was celebrated by Wall Street research houses a year ago, is being maligned today for acting as an impostor — not the indicator it is advertised to be because it gets re-jigged to fit the cycle.

From our lens, there is nothing wrong in trying to improve the predictive abilities of these leading indicators.  Still — it is a comment on how Wall Street researchers are incentivized to be bullish because nobody we know criticized the ECRI as it bounced off the lows (not least of which our debating pal, James Grant).

Also in Today’s Breakfast with Dave:

• While you were sleeping: a rough day for global equity markets; bonds retain their bid; the greenback is back in vogue

• True, North, Strong… And free. Canada has basically been re-rated coming out of the credit crisis as a bastion of stability in an increasingly unstable world

• The next best thing to having a bullish bond column published in the FT is to see an article about deflation. Indeed, deflation is the primary trend ahead

• Canadian inflation in-check: no big surprises in the latest CPI report; inflation remains below the BoC’s “operational target”

• More disappointing U.S. housing data: existing home sales fell 2.2% MoM in May

….read David’s summary version HERE

….Sign up for David’s Detailed version HERE